Using clinically derived human tissue to 3-dimensionally bioprint personalized testicular tubules for in vitro culturing: first report

Meghan Robinson,Erin Bedford,Luke Witherspoon,Stephanie M Willerth,Ryan Flannigan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xfss.2022.02.004
Abstract:Objective: To study the feasibility and spermatogenic potential of 3-dimensional (3D) bioprinting personalized human testicular cells derived from a patient with nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA). Design: A human testicular biopsy from a single donor with NOA was dissociated into single cells, expanded in vitro, and 3D bioprinted into tubular structures akin to the seminiferous tubule using AGC-10 bioink and an RX1 bioprinter with a CENTRA coaxial microfluidic printhead from Aspect Biosystems. Three-dimensional organoid cultures were used as a nonbioprinted in vitro control. Setting: Academic medical center. Patient(s): A 31-year-old man with NOA with testis biopsy demonstrating Sertoli cell-only syndrome. Intervention(s): Three-dimensional bioprinting and in vitro culturing of patient-derived testis cells. Main outcome measure(s): Cellular viability after printing was determined, along with the expression of phenotypic and spermatogenic functional genetic markers after 12 days of in vitro culture. Result(s): Testicular cultures were expandable in vitro and generated sufficiently large numbers for 3D bioprinting at 35 million cells per mL of bioink. Viability 24 hours after printing was determined to be 93.4% ± 2.4%. Immunofluorescence staining for the phenotype markers SRY-Box transcription factor 9, insulin-like 3, actin alpha 2 smooth muscle, and synaptonemal complex protein 3 after 12 days was positive, confirming the presence of Sertoli, Leydig, peritubular myoid, and meiotic germ cells. Reverse transcription qualitative polymerase chain reaction analysis showed that after 12 days in spermatogenic media, the bioprints substantially up-regulated spermatogenic gene expression on par with nonbioprinted controls and showed a particularly significant improvement in genes involved in spermatogonial stem cell maintenance: inhibitor of deoxyribonucleic acid binding 4 by 365-fold; fibroblast growth factor 3 by 94,152-fold; stem cell growth factor receptor KIT by twofold; stimulated by retinoic acid 8 by 125-fold; deleted in azoospermia-like by 114-fold; synaptonemal complex protein 3 by sevenfold; zona pellucida binding protein by twofold; transition protein 1 by 2,908-fold; and protamine 2 by 11-fold. Conclusion(s): This study demonstrates for the first time the feasibility of 3D bioprinting adult human testicular cells. We show that the bioprinting process is compatible with high testicular cell viability and without loss of the main somatic phenotypes within the testis tissue. We demonstrate an increase in germ cell markers in the 3D bioprinted tubules after 12 days of in vitro culture. This platform may carry future potential for disease modeling and regenerative opportunities in a personalized medicine framework.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?