Abstract:Background Although limited in predictive accuracy, polygenic scores (PGS) for educational outcomes are currently available to the public via direct-to-consumer genetic testing companies. Further, there is a growing movement to apply PGS in educational settings via 'precision education.' Prior scholarship highlights the potentially negative impacts of such applications, as disappointing results may give rise a "polygenic Pygmalion effect." In this paper two studies were conducted to identify factors that may mitigate or exacerbate negative impacts of PGS. Methods Two studies were conducted. In each, 1188 students were randomized to one of four conditions: Low-percentile polygenic score for educational attainment (EA-PGS), Low EA-PGS + Mitigating information, Low EA-PGS + Exacerbating information, or Control. Regression analyses were used to examine differences between conditions. Results In Study 1, participants randomized to Control reported significantly higher on the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES), Competence Scale (CS), Academic Efficacy Scale (AES) and Educational Potential Scale (EPS). CS was significantly higher in the Low EA-PGS + Mitigating information condition. CS and AES were significantly lower in the Low EA-PGS + Exacerbating information condition compared to the Low EA-PGS + Mitigating information condition. In Study 2, participants randomized to Control reported significantly higher CS and AES. Pairwise comparisons did not show significant differences in CS and AES. Follow-up pairwise comparisons using Tukey P -value correction did not find significant associations between non-control conditions. Conclusion These studies replicated the polygenic Pygmalion effect yet were insufficiently powered to detect significant effects of mitigating contextual information. Regardless of contextual information, disappointing EA-PGS results were significantly associated with lower assessments of self-esteem, competence, academic efficacy, and educational potential.

Relative contraindication to midhumeral block in a patient with contraceptive implant.

Risk factors affecting polygenic score performance across diverse cohorts

Mitigating type 1 error inflation and power loss in GxE PRS: Genotype–environment interaction in polygenic risk score models

Estimation of Direct and Indirect Polygenic Effects and Gene-Environment Interactions using Polygenic Scores in Case-Parent Trio Studies

Gene-environment dependencies lead to collider bias in models with polygenic scores

New methods, persistent issues, and one solution: Gene-environment interaction studies of childhood cognitive development

Resource profile and user guide of the Polygenic Index Repository

Variable prediction accuracy of polygenic scores within an ancestry group

Recent advances in polygenic scores: translation, equitability, methods and FAIR tools

Comparison of Adopted and Nonadopted Individuals Reveals Gene–Environment Interplay for Education in the UK Biobank

Improving on polygenic scores across complex traits using select and shrink with summary statistics (S4) and LDpred2

Improving GWAS performance in underrepresented groups by appropriate modeling of genetics, environment, and sociocultural factors

Expression based polygenic scores - A gene network perspective to capture individual differences in biological processes

Three Open Questions in Polygenic Score Portability

The Polygenic Score Catalog: an open database for reproducibility and systematic evaluation

Performance of deep-learning based approaches to improve polygenic scores

[Late results of Heller operation and fundoplication for the treatment of the megaesophagus: analysis of 83 cases].

Schoolhouse risk: Can we mitigate the polygenic Pygmalion effect?

Towards fair and clinically relevant polygenic predictions

An examination of genetic and environmental factors related to negative personality traits, educational attainment, and economic success.

The relationship between 11 different polygenic longevity scores, parental lifespan, and disease diagnosis in the UK Biobank