Abstract:Background Determining the optimal energy layer (EL) for each field, under considering both dose constraints and delivery efficiency, is crucial to promoting the development of proton arc therapy (PAT) technology. Purpose This study aimed to explore the feasibility and potential clinical benefits of utilizing machine learning (ML) technique to automatically select EL for each field in PAT plans of lung cancer. Methods Proton Bragg peak position (BPP) was employed to characterize EL. The ground truth BPPs for each field were determined using the modified ELO‐SPAT framework. Features in geometric, water‐equivalent thicknesses (WET) and beamlet were defined and extracted. By analyzing the relationship between the extracted features and ground truth, a polynomial regression model with L2‐norm regularization (Ridge regression) was constructed and trained. The performance of the regression model was reported as an error between the predictions and the ground truth. Besides, the predictions were used to make PAT plans (PAT_PRED). These plans were compared with those using the ground truth BPPs (PAT_TRUTH) and the mid‐WET of the target volumes (PAT_MID) in terms of relative biological effectiveness‐weighted dose (RWD) distributions. One hundred ten patients with lung cancer, a total of 7920 samples, were enrolled retrospectively, with 5940 cases randomly selected as the training set and the remaining 1980 cases as the testing set. Nine patients (648 samples) were collected additionally to evaluate the regression model in terms of plan quality and robustness. Results With regard to the prediction errors, the root mean squared errors and mean absolute errors between the ML‐predicted and ground truth BPPs for the testing set were 9.165 and 6.572 mm, respectively, indicating differences of approximately two to three ELs. As for plan quality, the PAT_TRUTH and PAT_PRED plans performed similarly in terms of plan robustness, target coverage and organs at risk (OARs) protection, with differences smaller than 0.5 Gy(RBE). This trend was also observed for dose conformity and uniformity. The PAT_MID plans produced the lowest robustness index and lowest doses to OARs, along with the highest heterogeneity index, indicating better protection for OARs, improved plan robustness, but compromised dose homogeneity. Additionally, for relatively small tumor sizes, the PAT_MID plan demonstrated a notably poor dose conformity index. Conclusions Within this cohort under investigation, our study demonstrated the feasibility of using ML technique to predict ELs for each field, offering a fast (within 2 s) and memory‐efficient reduced way to select ELs for PAT plan.

Toward automatic beam angle selection for pencil-beam scanning proton liver treatments: A deep learning-based approach

Dosimetric Analysis of Radiation Treatment Plans Based on a Deep Learning Auto Contouring Model for Patients with Localized Prostate Cancer

A data-driven approach to optimal beam/arc angle selection for liver stereotactic body radiation therapy treatment planning

Beam mask and sliding window-facilitated deep learning-based accurate and efficient dose prediction for pencil beam scanning proton therapy

A Fast Deep Learning Approach for Beam Orientation Optimization for Prostate Cancer IMRT Treatments

Online Adaptive Proton Therapy Facilitated by Artificial Intelligence-Based Autosegmentation in Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy

An inverse planning simulated annealing algorithm with adaptive weight adjustment for LDR pancreatic brachytherapy

A comparative study on automatic treatment planning for online adaptive proton therapy of esophageal cancer: Which combination of deformable registration and deep learning planning tools performs the best?

Noisy probing dose facilitated dose prediction for pencil beam scanning proton therapy: physics enhances generalizability

Evaluation of an automated clinical decision system with deep learning dose prediction and NTCP model for prostate cancer proton therapy

GAMBAS -- Fast Beam Arrangement Selection for Proton Therapy using a Nearest Neighbour Model

Autodelineation methods in a simulated fully automated proton therapy workflow for esophageal cancer

Automated plan generation for prostate radiotherapy patients using deep learning and scripted optimization

Artificial Intelligence-Facilitated Online Adaptive Proton Therapy Using Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy

Feasibility of proton dosimetry overriding planning CT with daily CBCT elaborated through generative artificial intelligence tools

Deep learning based linear energy transfer calculation for proton therapy

Improved Beam Angle Arrangement In Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy Treatment Planning For Localized Prostate Cancer

Applying mixed-integer linear programming to the non-coplanar beam angle optimization of intensity-modulated radiotherapy for liver cancer

SU‐E‐T‐358: Dosimetric Effects of Beam Angle Arrangements in Lung Proton Therapy

A machine learning‐based approach to predict energy layer for each field in spot‐scanning proton arc therapy for lung cancer: A feasibility study

A retrospective study on the investigation of potential dosimetric benefits of online adaptive proton therapy for head and neck cancer