coMpliAnce with evideNce-based cliniCal guidelines in the managemenT of acute biliaRy pancreAtitis): The MANCTRA-1 international audit
Mauro Podda,Daniela Pacella,Gianluca Pellino,Federico Coccolini,Alessio Giordano,Salomone Di Saverio,Francesco Pata,Benedetto Ielpo,Francesco Virdis,Dimitrios Damaskos,Belinda De Simone,Ferdinando Agresta,Massimo Sartelli,Ari Leppaniemi,Cristiana Riboni,Vanni Agnoletti,Damian Mole,Yoram Kluger,Fausto Catena,Adolfo Pisanu,MANCTRA-1 Collaborative Group,Principal Investigator,Steering Committee,MANCTRA-1 Coordinating Group,Local Collaborators,Argentina,Australia,Bahrain,Brazil,Bulgaria,China,Colombia,Czech Republic,Egypt,France,Georgia,Greece,Guatemala,India,Italy,Jordan,Malaysia,Mexico,Nigeria,Pakistan,Paraguay,Peru,Philippines,Poland,Portugal,Qatar,Romania,Russia,Serbia,Slovak Republic,South Africa,Spain,Sudan,Switzerland,Syria,Tunisia,Turkey,United Kingdom,Uruguay,Yemen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pan.2022.07.007
IF: 3.977
Pancreatology
Abstract:Background/objectives: Reports about the implementation of recommendations from acute pancreatitis guidelines are scant. This study aimed to evaluate, on a patient-data basis, the contemporary practice patterns of management of biliary acute pancreatitis and to compare these practices with the recommendations by the most updated guidelines. Methods: All consecutive patients admitted to any of the 150 participating general surgery (GS), hepatopancreatobiliary surgery (HPB), internal medicine (IM) and gastroenterology (GA) departments with a diagnosis of biliary acute pancreatitis between 01/01/2019 and 31/12/2020 were included in the study. Categorical data were reported as percentages representing the proportion of all study patients or different and well-defined cohorts for each variable. Continuous data were expressed as mean and standard deviation. Differences between the compliance obtained in the four different subgroups were compared using the Mann-Whitney U, Student's t, ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis tests for continuous data, and the Chi-square test or the Fisher's exact test for categorical data. Results: Complete data were available for 5275 patients. The most commonly discordant gaps between daily clinical practice and recommendations included the optimal timing for the index CT scan (6.1%, χ2 6.71, P = 0.081), use of prophylactic antibiotics (44.2%, χ2 221.05, P < 0.00001), early enteral feeding (33.2%, χ2 11.51, P = 0.009), and the implementation of early cholecystectomy strategies (29%, χ2 354.64, P < 0.00001), with wide variability based on the admitting speciality. Conclusions: The results of this study showed an overall poor compliance with evidence-based guidelines in the management of ABP, with wide variability based on the admitting speciality. Study protocol registered in ClinicalTrials.Gov (ID Number NCT04747990).