Abstract:Living cells are complex entities that perform many different complex tasks with astonishing robustness. While the direct dependence of biological processes on controlled protein expression is well established, we only begin to understand how intracellular mechanical characteristics guide and support biological function. This is in stark contrast to the expected functional role that intracellular mechanical properties should have for many core cellular functions such as organization, homeostasis and transport. From a mechanical point of view, cells are complex viscoelastic materials that are continuously driven out of thermodynamic equilibrium, which makes both a physical measurement and mathematical modeling of its properties difficult. Here, we define a “mechanical fingerprint” that can not only characterize the intracellular mechanical state, but also carve out the mechanical differences between cell types with the potential to relate these to proper cell function. By analyzing the frequency-dependent viscoelastic properties and intracellular activity of cells using microrheology, we distilled the complex active mechanical state into just 6 parameters that comprise the mechanical fingerprint. The systematic investigation of the fingerprint illustrates a parameter tuning that can be explained by the functional cellular requirements. However, the full potential of the mechanical fingerprint is given by a statistical analysis of its parameters across all investigated cell types, which suggests that cells adjust mechanical parameters in a correlated way to position their intracellular mechanical properties within a well defined phase-space that is spanned between activity, mechanical resistance and fluidity. This paves the way for a systematic study of the interdependence of biological function and intracellular active mechanics.

Integrating mechanical signals into cellular identity

Cell Mechanics: Integrating Cell Responses to Mechanical Stimuli

Cell engineering: Biophysical regulation of the nucleus

The mechanical regulation of integrin–cadherin crosstalk organizes cells, signaling and forces

Mechanics of Cell Mechanosensing on Patterned Substrate

The mechanical cell – the role of force dependencies in synchronising protein interaction networks

Chromatin plasticity in mechanotransduction

Cellular Modulation by the Mechanical Cues from Biomaterials for Tissue Engineering.

Feeling Things Out: Bidirectional Signaling of the Cell–ECM Interface, Implications in the Mechanobiology of Cell Spreading, Migration, Proliferation, and Differentiation

Nuclear envelope mechanobiology: linking the nuclear structure and function

Nuclear periphery and its mechanical regulation in cell fate transitions

Intracellular mechanical fingerprint reveals cell type specific mechanical tuning

Mechanical constraints organize 3D tissues and orchestrate muscle differentiation

Microtubule Assists Actomyosin to Regulate Cell Nuclear Mechanics and Chromatin Accessibility

The LINC Between Mechanical Forces and Chromatin

Mechano-osmotic signals control chromatin state and fate transitions in pluripotent stem cells

De novo identification of universal cell mechanics gene signatures

Morphomechanic tuning of ERK by actin-TFII-IΔ regulates cell identity

Regulation of genome organization and gene expression by nuclear mechanotransduction

Nuclear Mechanics and Mechanotransduction in Health and Disease

Cellular Modulation by the Elasticity of Biomaterials