Abstract:A chromatin interaction analysis with paired-end tagging (ChIA-PET) approach is used to delineate chromatin interactions mediated by RNA polymerase II in several different stem-cell populations; putative long-range promoter–enhancer interactions are inferred, indicating that linear juxtaposition does not necessarily guide enhancer target selection and prevalent cell-specific enhancer usage. Gene transcription requires dynamic chromatin connectivity between promoters bound by RNA polymerase II and their corresponding distal-acting enhancers. In this paper the authors use the ChIA-PET (chromatin interaction analysis with paired-end tagging) approach to delineate chromatin interactions mediated by RNA polymerase II in embryonic stem cells, neural stem cells and neurosphere progenitor cells. Putative enhancer–promoter interactions can be inferred, and many enhancers associate with promoters located beyond their nearest active genes, indicating that linear juxtaposition does not necessarily guide enhancer target selection. This work illustrates the possible importance of underlying chromatin structures in nuclear function. In multicellular organisms, transcription regulation is one of the central mechanisms modelling lineage differentiation and cell-fate determination1. Transcription requires dynamic chromatin configurations between promoters and their corresponding distal regulatory elements2. It is believed that their communication occurs within large discrete foci of aggregated RNA polymerases termed transcription factories in three-dimensional nuclear space3. However, the dynamic nature of chromatin connectivity has not been characterized at the genome-wide level. Here, through a chromatin interaction analysis with paired-end tagging approach3,4,5 using an antibody that primarily recognizes the pre-initiation complexes of RNA polymerase II6, we explore the transcriptional interactomes of three mouse cells of progressive lineage commitment, including pluripotent embryonic stem cells7, neural stem cells8 and neurosphere stem/progenitor cells9. Our global chromatin connectivity maps reveal approximately 40,000 long-range interactions, suggest precise enhancer–promoter associations and delineate cell-type-specific chromatin structures. Analysis of the complex regulatory repertoire shows that there are extensive colocalizations among promoters and distal-acting enhancers. Most of the enhancers associate with promoters located beyond their nearest active genes, indicating that the linear juxtaposition is not the only guiding principle driving enhancer target selection. Although promoter–enhancer interactions exhibit high cell-type specificity, promoters involved in interactions are found to be generally common and mostly active among different cells. Chromatin connectivity networks reveal that the pivotal genes of reprogramming functions are transcribed within physical proximity to each other in embryonic stem cells, linking chromatin architecture to coordinated gene expression. Our study sets the stage for the full-scale dissection of spatial and temporal genome structures and their roles in orchestrating development.

Mechano-osmotic signals control chromatin state and fate transitions in pluripotent stem cells

Deconstructing Transcriptional Heterogeneity in Pluripotent Stem Cells

Engineering Mouse Cell Fate Controller by Rational Design

Harnessing Endogenous Transcription Factors Directly by Small Molecules for Chemically Induced Pluripotency Inception.

Morphomechanic tuning of ERK by actin-TFII-IΔ regulates cell identity

Chromatin plasticity in mechanotransduction

Chromatin lncRNA Platr10 controls stem cell pluripotency by coordinating an intrachromosomal regulatory network

Molecular Mechanisms of Pluripotency and Reprogramming

Chromatin remodeling and its epigenetic regulatory mechanisms in cell fate transition

Transcription factor stoichiometry, motif affinity and syntax regulate single-cell chromatin dynamics during fibroblast reprogramming to pluripotency

Nuclear periphery and its mechanical regulation in cell fate transitions

Biophysical Regulation of Chromatin Architecture Instills a Mechanical Memory in Mesenchymal Stem Cells

Dynamic Chromatin States in Human ES Cells Reveal Potential Regulatory Sequences and Genes Involved in Pluripotency.

Transient nuclear deformation primes epigenetic state and promotes cell reprogramming

Chromatin Connectivity Maps Reveal Dynamic Promoter–enhancer Long-Range Associations

Reduction of Intracellular Tension and Cell Adhesion Promotes Open Chromatin Structure and Enhances Cell Reprogramming

Transcription factors orchestrate dynamic interplay between genome topology and gene regulation during cell reprogramming

The regulatory architecture of the primed pluripotent cell state

Mechanosensitive genomic enhancers potentiate the cellular response to matrix stiffness

Mechanical strain treatment improves nuclear transfer reprogramming efficiency by enhancing chromatin accessibility

The relationship between nanoscale genome organization and gene expression in mouse embryonic stem cells during pluripotency transition