Abstract:Abstract Background Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the preferred surgical treatment for IBD or FAP. As these diseases often manifest during adolescence or early adulthood, treatment effects on genitourinary function (GU), sexual function, and fertility are of paramount importance. However, the difference in male GU function and sexual function after minimally invasive IPAA (MIS-IPAA) compared to open-IPAA are unclear. We conducted an observational survey to compare long-term GU functionality in male patients’ post MIS-IPAA or open-IPAA. Methods All adult male patients who underwent IPAA at a single tertiary hospital between 1983 and 2023 were identified, and demographics and clinical data were obtained from our prospectively maintained pouch registry. Patients were surveyed using validated questionnaires (Table 1). The primary outcome was the composite survey scores. Patients were stratified into MIS-IPAA (laparoscopic, robotic, single-incision surgery) or open-IPAA groups based on the mode of pelvic/rectal dissection. Reoperative IPAA procedures (revisions, redo, and excisions), incomplete surveys, patients with permanent ileostomy, and status post prostatectomy were excluded. Results A total of 1,836 patients were surveyed, and 457 (24.9%) submitted a response. After exclusion criteria, 296 responses were analyzed: 236 (79.7%) open-IPAA and 60 (20.3%) MIS-IPAA. In both groups, most patients had ulcerative colitis (88 vs. 89%). Compared to open-IPAA, MIS-IPAA had a similar age at surgery (40.6 vs. 40.9, p=0.88), younger age at survey (48.2 vs 58.2, p<0.001), and shorter interval between surgery and survey (7.7 vs. 17.4, p<0.001). Male MIS-IPAA patients were able to achieve orgasm more successfully than those with open-IPAA (5 vs. 4, p=0.001). No significant difference was observed between MIS- and open-IPAA in erectile function (SHIM score 22.5 vs 21, p=0.22), IBD-specific male sexual dysfunction (IBD-MSDS, 3 vs. 2, p=0.19), lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) (CLLS, 4 vs. 6, p=0.16), or use of therapeutic aids for sexual activity (6 vs. 6, p=0.7). There was no difference in global quality of life (CGQoL, 0.83 vs 0.80, p=0.6). There were no differences between the patients who had difficulty conceiving a child (4 vs. 7, p=0.46) and those who experienced infertility (1 vs. 2, p=0.54). Patients experiencing infertility showed no difference in quality of life between the MIS- and open-IPAA groups (FertiQoL, 84.9 vs 85.9, p=0.64). Conclusion Minimally invasive IPAA had a higher preservation of orgasm ability than did open IPAA. There was no difference in erectile function, LUTS, need for therapeutic aids for sexual function, or fertility between MIS and open approach to pelvic dissection in IPAA.

Long-term outcomes of male imperforate anus with recto-urethral fistula: laparoscopy-assisted anorectoplasty versus posterior sagittal anorectoplasty

Lessons learned from lower urinary tract complications of anorectoplasty for imperforate anus with rectourethral/rectovesical fistula: Laparoscopy-assisted versus posterior sagittal approaches

Functional Outcome in Patients With Anorectal Malformation With Recto-prostatic or Recto-bulbar Urethral Fistula and Comparison Between Different Surgical Approaches: A Multi-center Study

Quality of life and defecative function 10 years or longer after posterior sagittal anorectoplasty and laparoscopic-assisted anorectal pull-through for anorectal malformation

Comparison of postoperative urinary complications in laparoscopic-assisted anorectoplasty versus posterior sagittal anorectoplasty for anorectal malformation with rectourethral fistula

Rectovaginal Fistulas: Comparative Analysis of Laparoscopic Assisted Pullthrough and Posterior Sagittal Anorectoplasty

Anorectal malformation with long perineal fistula: one of a special type

Long-term outcomes of fistula-tract laser closure for complex perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease

[Long-term outcomes of individualized biofeedback training based on the underlying dysfunction for patients with imperforate anus].

The PPP - Perineal Body Preserving PSARP (Posterior Sagittal Anorectoplasty) for Anorectal Malformation with Rectovestibular Fistula in Females—Report of Early Outcomes

The long-term post-surgical outcome of intermediate anorectal malformation in our department

Current practice of diagnosis and treatment for rectourethral fistula in male patients with anorectal malformation: a multicenter questionnaire survey in Japan

P270 Male Genitourinary Dysfunction after Primary and Reoperative Ileoanal Pouch Surgery

Functional Outcomes of Patients Who Underwent Anorectal Malformation Repair Using MRI Guidance

[Endo-anal and transperineal continence preserving closure techniques in surgical treatment of Crohn fistulas. A prospective long-term study of 186 patients]

P252 Male Genitourinary Dysfunction after Minimally Invasive and Open Ileoanal Pouch

Temporal changes in functional outcomes of stapled and hand-sewn ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis

Perioperative Histologically Controlled Fistula Resection in Patients with Imperforate Anus and Perineal Fistula

Clinical application of artificial anal reconstruction after laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection in low rectal cancer patients]

Postoperative Complications of Laparoscopic Assisted Anorectal Pull-Through in Children with Congenital Anorectal Malformations

Effect of megarectum on postoperative defecation of female patients with congenital rectovestibular fistula or rectoperineal fistula