Abstract:Copy number variations (CNVs) are gain and loss of DNA sequence of a genome. High throughput platforms such as microarrays and next generation sequencing technologies (NGS) have been applied for genome wide copy number losses. Although progress has been made in both approaches, the accuracy and consistency of CNV calling from the two platforms remain in dispute. In this study, we perform a deep analysis on copy number losses on 254 human DNA samples, which have both SNP microarray data and NGS data publicly available from Hapmap Project and 1000 Genomes Project respectively. We show that the copy number losses reported from Hapmap Project and 1000 Genome Project only have < 30% overlap, while these reports are required to have cross-platform (e.g. PCR, microarray and high-throughput sequencing) experimental supporting by their corresponding projects, even though state-of-art calling methods were employed. On the other hand, copy number losses are found directly from HapMap microarray data by an accurate algorithm, i.e. CNVhac, almost all of which have lower read mapping depth in NGS data; furthermore, 88% of which can be supported by the sequences with breakpoint in NGS data. Our results suggest the ability of microarray calling CNVs and the possible introduction of false negatives from the unessential requirement of the additional cross-platform supporting. The inconsistency of CNV reports from Hapmap Project and 1000 Genomes Project might result from the inadequate information containing in microarray data, the inconsistent detection criteria, or the filtration effect of cross-platform supporting. The statistical test on CNVs called from CNVhac show that the microarray data can offer reliable CNV reports, and majority of CNV candidates can be confirmed by raw sequences. Therefore, the CNV candidates given by a good caller could be highly reliable without cross-platform supporting, so additional experimental information should be applied in need instead of necessarily.

Progress in Methods for Copy Number Variation Profiling

Accuracy Of Cnv Detection From Gwas Data

A Survey of Copy‐Number Variation Detection Tools Based on High‐Throughput Sequencing Data

Comprehensive assessment of long-read sequencing platforms and calling algorithms for detection of copy number variation

SeqCNV: a Novel Method for Identification of Copy Number Variations in Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing Data

Methods and strategies for analyzing copy number variation using DNA microarrays

Evaluation of tools for identifying large copy number variations from ultra-low-coverage whole-genome sequencing data

Clinical impact of copy number variation analysis using high-resolution microarray technologies: advantages, limitations and concerns

A Remark on Copy Number Variation Detection Methods

CNVbd: A Method for Copy Number Variation Detection and Boundary Search

Copy Number Variation In Human Health, Disease, And Evolution

Identification of copy number variants in whole-genome data using Reference Coverage Profiles

DL-CNV: A Deep Learning Method for Identifying Copy Number Variations Based on Next Generation Target Sequencing

Evaluation of somatic copy number variation detection by NGS technologies and bioinformatics tools on a hyper-diploid cancer genome

CNV-P: a machine-learning framework for predicting high confident copy number variations

CNV-Profile Regression: A New Approach for Copy Number Variant Association Analysis in Whole Genome Sequencing Data

PEcnv: accurate and efficient detection of copy number variations of various lengths

[Copy Number Variations in the Human Genome: Their Mutational Mechanisms and Roles in Diseases].

Using GWAS Data to Identify Copy Number Variants Contributing to Common Complex Diseases

Genome-wide copy number analysis of single cells

Copy Number Variation Detection In Whole-Genome Sequencing Data Using The Bayesian Information Criterion