CURARIZATION OF DENERVATED MUSCLE
L. W. Jarcho,B. Berman,C. Eyzaguirre,J. L. Lilienthal
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1951.tb39929.x
IF: 6.499
1951-10-01
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Abstract:Some three years ago, Barlow and Ing‘ and Paton and Zaimis2 introduced a series of biologically active, synthetic compounds, a family of straightchain carbon compounds containing a quaternary nitrogen a t ezch end of the molecule. Extensive studies of the physiological effects of these drugs were undertaken by Paton and coworker^.^ They demonstrated that the compound containing 10 carbon atoms, bis-trimethylammonium decane, referred to as Clo or decamethonium, had strong paralyzing effects on skeletal muscle. Comparison of Clo with d-tubocurarine” inevitably foilowed, and it was shown3* that the new agent mimicked d-tubocurarine in some respects, while, under other circumstances, it had divergent, if not antagonistic effects. The investigations presented here are concerned principally with the actions of the two substances on denervated skeletal muscle. For purposes of orientation, however, some of their effects on normally innervated muscle are outlined briefly. It must be stressed a t the outset that these experiments have been confined to the rat. The work of Paton and others makes it quite clear that marked species differences exist in the responses to certain blocking agents. At times, these differences are so great as to appear to be qualitative rather than quantitative. In any case, general conclusions must be drawn with great caution. According to the simplest classical definition, an agent is “curare-like’’ if it blocks neuromuscular transmission without modifying conduction in nerve and without affecting twitch tension in response to direct stimulation. By these general criteria, Clo was found to be “curare-like.” Moreover, the block at the myoneural junction was accompanied by alterations in the end-plate potential and in the consequent propagated disturbance, which seemed entirely similar to those produced by d-tubocurarine.‘ With either agent, the propagated muscle action potential declined in voltage and, simultaneously, its latency became prolonged. As the propagated potential disappeared, recordings taken near the myoneural junction revealed the local end-plate potential, which also declined. It is widely believed that curare produces its blocking effect by preventing acetylcholine from depolarizing the end plate. I t seemed reasonable, therefore, to assume a t first that the Clo effect, so similar in appearance, was produced in the same way. That the case is not this simple was shown by Brown, Paton, and Vianna Dias,6 when they demonstrated that, in the cat, Clo itself depolarized muscle, thus appearing to exert an action more