High stathmin expression is a marker for poor clinical outcome in endometrial cancer: An NRG oncology group/gynecologic oncology group study.

H. Reyes,J. Miecznikowski,J. Gonzalez-Bosquet,E. Devor,Yuping Zhang,Kristina W. Thiel,M. Samuelson,M. Mcdonald,J. Stephan,P. Hanjani,S. Guntupalli,K. Tewari,F. Backes,N. Ramirez,G. Fleming

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.05.017

IF: 5.304

2017-08-01

Gynecologic Oncology

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Prehabilitation in Modern Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Comprehensive Review

Augustinas Bausys,Marius Kryzauskas,Vilius Abeciunas,Austeja Elzbieta Degutyte,Rimantas Bausys,Kestutis Strupas,Tomas Poskus

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14205017

2022-10-14

Cancers

Abstract:Colorectal cancer remains the third most prevalent cancer worldwide, exceeding 1.9 million new cases annually. Surgery continues to be the gold standard treatment option. Unfortunately, colorectal cancer surgery carries significant postoperative morbidity and mortality. Moreover, most rectal cancer patients and some patients with locally advanced colon cancer require preoperative neoadjuvant therapy. It improves long-term outcomes but impairs patients' physical fitness and thus further increases surgical risk. Recently, prehabilitation has gained interest as a novel strategy to reduce treatment-related morbidity for patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery. However, the concept is still in its infancy, and the role of prehabilitation remains controversial. In this comprehensive review, we sum up present evidence on prehabilitation before colorectal cancer surgery. Available studies are very heterogenous in interventions and investigated outcomes. Nonetheless, all trials show at least some positive effects of prehabilitation on patients' physical, nutritional, or psychological status or even reduced postoperative morbidity. Unfortunately, the optimal prehabilitation program remains undetermined; therefore, this concept cannot be widely implemented. Future studies investigating optimal prehabilitation regimens for patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer are necessary.

oncology
Physical activity programmes for patients undergoing neo-adjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Marianne Latrille,Nicolas C Buchs,Frédéric Ris,Thibaud Koessler

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000027754

2021-12-23

Abstract:Background: Patients diagnosed with localized rectal cancer should undergo Neoadjuvant Radio-Chemotherapy (NACRT) followed, a few weeks later, by surgical resection. NACRT is known to cause significant decline in the physical and psychological health of patients. This literature review aims to summarize the effects of a prehabilitation programme during and/or after NACRT but before surgery. Methods: Articles included in this review have been selected by two independent researchers on Pubmed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane databases with the following terms: "Rectal Cancer AND Physical Activity" and "Exercise AND Rectal Cancer." Results: We obtained 560 articles. We selected 12 of these, representing 7 series but only one randomized study, constituting 153 patients in total. Most studies included have considerable variation in their prehabilitation programmes, in terms of supervision, training content, frequency, intensity, duration, and temporality, in regard to NACRT and surgery. Implementing a prehabilitation programme during NACRT seems feasible and safe, with adherence ranging from 58% to 100%. VO2max (maximal oxygen consumption during incremental exercise) was improved in three of the studies during the prehabilitation programme. No significant difference in the step count, 6-minute-walk test, or quality of life was seen. Conclusions: Prehabilitation programmes during NACRT for localized rectal cancer patients are safe and feasible; however, due to considerable variation in the prehabilitation programmes and their small size, impact on fitness, quality of life, and surgical outcome are unknown. Larger randomized studies are needed.
Prehabilitation and its Outcomes in Cancer Patients: A Narrative Review

A. J. Rajendran,M. A. Raja,S. Benedic Kingslin Suresh

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ijpmr.ijpmr_13_23

2024-01-01

Indian Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Abstract:Abstract Prehabilitation is a multidisciplinary health enhancement programme offered before a disease intervention, such as surgery or chemotherapy/radiotherapy. It is a holistic patient care model that focuses on providing nutritional, psychological and functional care to patients before their intervention. Researchers have found that prehabilitation can improve patient outcomes by preparing for a surgery-associated physiological challenge. While studies have been limited, prehabilitation remains a promising strategy for cancer surgery with potential benefits such as improved outcomes, early recovery and lower hospital stay. The concept of prehabilitation has been growing rapidly, and it aims to enhance a patient’s overall health and well-being before surgery or other therapeutic interventions. Prehabilitation can be a valuable tool for cancer patients, providing advantages such as improved outcomes, early recovery and reduced hospital stay after surgery. However, more evidence is needed to support the effectiveness of prehabilitation. This review paper provides an overview of current knowledge and results of studies on the role of prehabilitation in cancer surgery, highlighting the positive effects of prehabilitation on physical performance, nutritional status, quality of life and sometimes reduced morbidity. Allied interventions, such as cardiac and pulmonary rehabilitation, can also provide valuable lessons for prehabilitation in practice. This comprehensive review provides a well-structured and informative presentation, ensuring clarity and ease of understanding for a technical audience. The technical details are well-supported by appropriate references, ensuring accuracy and credibility. Overall, the paper is a thorough and informative review of prehabilitation in cancer patients, outlining key concepts and evidence and providing insights for future research and practice.
Can we "prehabilitate" pancreatic cancer patients prior to surgery?A critical appraisal of the literature

Mina Refaat,Shreeyash Modak,Chidananda Harivelam,Shahid Ullah,Katia Ferrar,Sunil Pandya,Pradeep Rebala,G V Rao,Hans D de Boer,Savio George Barreto,Monish Karunakaran

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnesp.2024.08.003

2024-08-21

Abstract:Background: Enhancing a patient's functional capacity to withstand the surgical stress by means of multimodal (combined exercise, nutrition and psychological interventions) prehabilitation may potentially lead to improved outcomes in pancreatic cancer surgery. Methodology: A systematic review was undertaken searching PubMed, Google Scholar and Cochrane Library databases, exploring the impact of prehabilitation in pancreatic surgery. Outcomes of interest were adherence to the prehabilitation, functional capacity, overall complications and post-operative length of stay. Pooled analysis was performed using a random-effects model. Results: Twelve studies comprising of 1497 patients were included in the review. Most of the studies seem to lack a multimodal approach. Less than 50 % of the studies reported adherence, which ranged between 27 to 100 %. Functional capacity, in terms of 6-minute walk test, showed improvement with prehabilitation. Among the post-operative outcomes, prehabilitation was associated with significant improvement in pulmonary complications (2.4 % versus 6.7 %, RR 0.36, CI 0.17-0.74, p= 0.01, I2= 28%). Prehabilitation was not effective in terms of length of stay or readmission rates. Conclusions: Larger studies with multimodal prehabilitation approaches may demonstrate more consistent and clinically meaningful benefits, which would lead to a firm appreciation of its role the management of pancreatic cancer patients undergoing surgery.
Temporary and permanent modifications to a single strain of mouse scrapie on transmission to rats and hamsters.

R. Kimberlin,S. Cole,C. Walker

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1099/0022-1317-68-7-1875

1987-07-01

Journal of General Virology

Abstract:The interspecies transmission of scrapie is frequently associated with exceptionally long incubation periods at first passage in the new host compared to later passages (the species barrier effect). The basis of this was investigated using the 139A strain of scrapie which had been cloned by three serial passages in mice at limiting infectious doses. Cloned scrapie was passaged through hamsters (twice) or rats (thrice) and then reisolated in mice. Large species barrier effects were encountered on mouse-to-hamster and hamster-to-mouse passage resulting in the isolation of a mutant strain, 139-H/M, with properties very different from 139A. In contrast, the strain reisolated from rats was indistinguishable from 139A. However, a large species barrier was encountered at the mouse-to-rat passage but not at the rat-to-mouse passage. It is suggested that the transmission of scrapie between species may be associated with no change in properties or a permanent change in the scrapie genome due to the selection of mutants. A third possibility, the donor species effect, is a temporary change occurring only at first passage in the new host species which is largely or entirely caused by the introduction of material from the previous host. We speculate that the donor species effect could be explained if some host protein forms a functional part of the infectious agent.
Prehab, ERAS, Rehab: A patient care continuum around colo-rectal surgery: Prehabilitation combined with ERAS and rehabilitation to reduce morbidity and hospital stay

Federica Gonella,Paolo Massucco,Serena Perotti,Stefano Gianolio,Daniela Vassallo,Serena Monasterolo,Antonella Laezza,Beatrice De Zolt Ponte,Andrea Ricotti,Alessandro Ferrero

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108688

2024-09-12

Abstract:Background: Prehabilitation (Prehab) programs aim to optimize patients psycho-physical condition before surgery, to improve post-operative outcomes. Although functional benefits of Prehab are known, the clinical impact does not yet have concrete evidence. The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of Prehab, associated with Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) and surgical rehabilitation (Rehab), in frail colorectal oncological patients in terms of morbidity and hospitalization. Patients and methods: The cohort of patients undergoing Prehab between January 2020 and December 2022 (Prehab group) is compared with the historical cohort of patients operated on in the period 01/2018-12/2019, not undergoing Prehab (no-Prehab group). Prehab scheme: multimodal (physiotherapy, clinical nutrition and psychological support). All patients followed an ERAS path. Only Prehab patients followed a surgical Rehab by a dedicated nurse case-manager. Propensity score matching (PSM) and weighting (PSW) analyses were used for statistical analysis. Primary objectives: complications at 30 days and hospital stay. Secondary objectives: functional outcomes. Results: In 3 years of preliminary enrollment, 36 patients completed the program: 22 in person, 16 in tele-prehab. The Prehab group experienced fewer complications than the no-Prehab group (PSM: 31 % vs 53 % p = 0.02; PSW: 31 % vs 51 % p = 0.02), less severe complications (CCI>20 PSM: 17 % vs 33 % p = 0.074; PSW: 17 % vs 53 % 0.026) and shorter hospital stay (4.5 vs 6 days; p = 0.02). Finally, prehabilitated patients improved their preoperative functional capacity and reduced anxiety levels. Conclusion: The strategy of combining Prehab with ERAS and Rehab has positively influenced post-operative clinical outcomes as well as functional parameters in our series.
A systematic review and meta-analysis of high-quality randomized controlled trials on the role of prehabilitation programs in colorectal surgery

Zoe Garoufalia,Sameh Hany Emile,Sarinya Meknarit,Rachel Gefen,Nir Horesh,Peige Zhou,Pauline Aeschbacher,Victor Strassmann,Steven D. Wexner

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2024.07.009

IF: 4.348

2024-08-18

Surgery

Abstract:Background Prehabilitation is gaining popularity in colorectal surgery but lacks high-quality postoperative outcomes data. This meta-analysis explored whether prehabilitation impacts postoperative outcomes. Methods In this meta-analysis, compliant with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses, we searched PubMed and Scopus through November 2022. High-quality randomized control trials involving adults who underwent colorectal surgery with/without exercise-based prehabilitation were included. The main outcomes were short-term postoperative morbidity, readmissions, and length of stay. Random-effect meta-analyses were performed, and statistical heterogeneity was assessed using the I 2 statistic. Results Seven high-quality randomized control trials comprising 1,225 patients were included. The median prehabilitation duration was 4 (2–4) weeks. Four studies compared prehabilitation and standard of care, and 3 compared prehabilitation and rehabilitation. Exercise-based prehabilitation did not reduce the odds of short-term complications (odds ratio 0.62, 95% confidence interval 0.27–1.40, P = .25, I 2 = 68%) or readmission (odds ratio 1, 95% confidence interval 0.73–1.46, P = .85, I 2 = 0%). The prehabilitation group had shorter length of hospital stay (weighted mean difference –0.2, 95% confidence interval –0.25 to –0.14, P < .0001, I 2 = 43.3%). Prehabilitation and rehabilitation had similar odds of short-term complications (odds ratio 1.03, 95% confidence interval 0.56–1.89, P = .91, I 2 = 33%), length of stay (weighted mean difference –0.16, 95% confidence interval –0.47 to 0.16, P = .33, I 2 = 59%), and readmission (odds ratio 1.25, 95% confidence interval 0.28–5.56, P = .77, I 2 = 52%). The only benefit of prehabilitation over rehabilitation was better 6-minute walking distance test results at time of surgery (weighted mean difference: –9.4 m; 95% confidence interval –18.04 to 0.79, P = .03, I 2 = 42%). Conclusion Prehabilitation provided decreased postoperative length of hospital stay and improved preoperative functional outcomes, but not reduced odds of complications and/or readmissions. Prehabilitation and rehabilitation had similar clinical outcomes.

surgery
Sex peptide and the sperm effect in Drosophila melanogaster

W. Swanson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1834127100

2003-08-11

Abstract:On mating, Drosophila females undergo dramatic alterations in their reproductive physiology and behavior (Fig. 1) (1). Egg production and egg laying are significantly increased, and the female's propensity to remate is drastically reduced. These changes in the female have been shown to be initially induced by seminal fluids transferred from the male to the female during mating and to persist because of the presence of stored sperm in the female (referred to as the “sperm effect”). The male seminal fluid proteins are synthesized in paired secretory organs of the male reproductive tract called accessory glands, the products of which are referred to as accessory gland proteins (Acps). Acps have been studied because of their importance for reproduction as well as their interesting evolutionary dynamics. Two articles in this issue of PNAS provide additional insights into Acp function and the sperm effect by characterizing a null mutant (2) and RNA interference knockdowns (3) for one of the most interesting Acps, the Sex Peptide (SP) [Acp70A (4)]. Fig. 1. Image of Drosophila mating. The female decreases her remating rate and increases her egg-laying rate after mating due, in part, to the transfer of SP from the male to the female. (Photograph courtesy of Avis C. James and Gary Wolsieffer.) Mating-induced changes in female Drosophila have been described as occurring in two phases, short- and long-term stages. The short-term effect is attributed largely to the rapid action of several Acps, some acting before and during the storage of sperm. Through the use of males lacking Acps, sperm, or both, it was determined that the actions of Acps on their own last no longer than 1 day after mating (5, 6). The functions of the Acps have been studied by several methods, the two most robust using genetics to either ectopically express the Acp …
Multimodal prehabilitation in patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review

R.A. Nurmukhametov,T.S. Dikova,V.К. Lyadov,К.А. Kulbasova,V.N. Galkin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31917/2303187

2022-09-30

Practical oncology

Abstract:Background. Patients with advanced colorectal cancer commonly demonstrate high frequency of sarcopenia (skeletal muscle depletion) and nutritional deficiency while being in need of complex surgical interventions. This led to the development of «multimodal prehabilitation» concept including physical training, nutritional and psychological support. Aim. We aim to summarize recent literature regarding the impact of prehabilitation on the surgical treatment of patients with colorectal cancer. Methods. PubMed, Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched for relevant original studies published between January 2011 to December 2021. Results. Eight studies comprising 732 patients were included. The duration of prehabilitation ranged from 2 to 6 weeks,adherence – from 78% to 98%. All studies had functional tests as the primary end-point. Six studies used a 6-minute walk test to measure physical performance. Five studies showed an increase in functional walking capacity in the prehabilitation group, 1 study revealed a significant decrease in the level of anxiety and depression (according to the HADS scale) after prehabilitation. All studies did not demonstrate the impact of prehabilitation on postoperative complications and mortality as well as nutrition status of colorectal cancer patients. Conclusions. Heterogeneity of prehabilitation programs as well as the absence of randomized trials preclude wide adoption of multimodal prehabilitation. Standardized prehabilitation programs are needed to further understand the influence of prehabilitation on the clinical trajectory of patients with colorectal cancer. Also, the preliminary selection of high-risk patients is required to evaluate the clinical importance of prehabilitation.
Prehabilitation to improve postoperative outcomes in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis undergoing hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC): A scoping review

D Strijker,W J H J Meijerink,A J A Bremers,P de Reuver,C J H M van Laarhoven,B van den Heuvel

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2021.10.006

Abstract:Background: Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) leads to increased survival rates in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis, but is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality rates. Prehabilitation, a process to optimize a patient's preoperative functional capacity, has a positive impact on recovery after colorectal surgery. The impact of prehabilitation in patients undergoing HIPEC is scarcely investigated. This scoping review and narrative synthesis aims to summarize and evaluate what is currently reported about the effect of prehabilitation on postoperative outcomes after HIPEC. Methods: A literature search of studies reporting on the effect of prehabilitation on outcomes after HIPEC was performed (August 2020). Study characteristics, patient demographics, composition of prehabilitation programs, and reported outcomes used to quantify the effect of prehabilitation were recorded. Results: The literature search did not yield any studies on the effect of prehabilitation programs on outcomes after HIPEC. As an alternative, studies identifying modifiable risk factors for poor postoperative outcomes after HIPEC that can be targeted by prehabilitation were reviewed to evaluate starting points for prehabilitation. Fourteen studies identify the following preoperative factors: poor nutritional status, poor performance status, low health related quality of life and an history of smoking. Conclusion: No research has been published on the effect of prehabilitation prior to HIPEC. This review demonstrates that preoperative modifiable risk factors for outcomes in patients undergoing HIPEC are multifactorial. A multimodal prehabilitation program prior to HIPEC, including nutritional support, psychical exercise, psychological support and smoking cessation, might therefore be a promising approach to improve postoperative outcomes.
Multimodal prehabilitation in elective oncological colorectal surgery enhances preoperative physical fitness: a single center prospective real-world data analysis

David W.G. Ten Cate,Charissa R. Sabajo,Charlotte J.L. Molenaar,Loes Janssen,Bart C. Bongers,Gerrit D. Slooter

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/1651-226x.2024.20287

IF: 4.311

2024-02-21

Acta Oncologica

Abstract:Background: Surgery can lead to curation in colorectal cancer (CRC) but is associated with significant morbidity. Prehabilitation plays an important role in increasing preoperative physical fitness to reduce morbidity risk; however, data from real-world practice is scarce. This study aimed to evaluate the change in preoperative physical fitness and to evaluate which patients benefit most from prehabilitation. Materials and Methods: In this single-arm prospective cohort study, consecutive patients undergoing elective colorectal oncological surgery were offered a 3- to 4-week multimodal prehabilitation program (supervised physical exercise training, dietary consultation, protein and vitamin supplementation, smoking cessation, and psychological support). The primary outcome was the change in preoperative aerobic fitness (steep ramp test (SRT)). Secondary outcomes were the change in functional walking capacity (6-minute walk test (6MWT)), and muscle strength (one-repetition maximum (1RM) for various muscle groups). To evaluate who benefit most from prehabilitation, participants were divided in quartiles (Q1, Q2, Q3, and Q4) based on baseline performance. Results: In total, 101 patients participated (51.4% male, aged 69.7 ± 12.7 years). The preoperative change in SRT was +28.3 W, +0.36 W/kg, +16.7% (P<0.001). Patients in all quartiles improved at the group level; however, the relative improvement decreased from Q1-Q2, Q2-Q3, and Q3-Q4 (P=0.049). Change in 6MWT was +37.5 m, +7.7% (P<0.001) and 1RM improved with 5.6-33.2 kg, 16.1-32.5% for the various muscle groups (P<0.001). Conclusion: Prehabilitation in elective oncological colorectal surgery is associated with enhanced preoperative physical fitness regardless of baseline performance. Improvements were relatively larger in less fit patients.

oncology
Exploring the acceptability of and adherence to prehabilitation and rehabilitation in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abdulaziz Alsuwaylihi,Pavel Skořepa,Carla M Prado,Dhanny Gomez,Dileep N Lobo,Dominic O'Connor

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnesp.2024.07.1060

Abstract:Background and aims: Prehabilitation combines exercise, nutritional, and psychological interventions administered before surgery to improve patient outcomes. This comprehensive review and meta-analysis examined the feasibility, adherence, and effectiveness of prehabilitation in frail, high-risk individuals undergoing major abdominal surgery. Methods: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, MEDLINE, Embase, and Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) databases to identify relevant studies evaluating prehabilitation programs published between 2010 and 2023, either as observational studies or randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Results: The 23 articles (13 RCTs and 10 observational studies) included 1849 older male and female patients aged 68.7 ± 7.2 years. Nineteen of the included studies reported on adherence to prehabilitation programmes, which was generally good (>75%) over different models, settings, and durations. Factors such as patients' desire for expedited surgery, self-assessment of fitness, personal and professional obligations, health issues, holidays, and advancement of surgery dates negatively affected adherence to prehabilitation programmes. When compared with rehabilitation or standard pre- and post-surgical care, prehabilitation was associated with a 25%, albeit not statistically significant reduction in postoperative complications, according to data from 14 studies reporting on postoperative complications (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.17, P = 0.43; I2 = 65%). Prehabilitation has been found to improve the 6-min walk test significantly by 29.4 m (MD +29.4 m, 95% CI 5.6 to 53.3, P = 0.02; I2 = 39%), compared with rehabilitation or standard pre- and post-surgical care. Conclusion: Prehabilitation was acceptable to patients, with good adherence, and improved physical function.
Efficacy of Prehabilitation Including Exercise on Postoperative Outcomes Following Abdominal Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Jamie L Waterland,Orla McCourt,Lara Edbrooke,Catherine L Granger,Hilmy Ismail,Bernhard Riedel,Linda Denehy

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.628848

2021-03-19

Abstract:Objectives: This systematic review set out to identify, evaluate and synthesise the evidence examining the effect of prehabilitation including exercise on postoperative outcomes following abdominal cancer surgery. Methods: Five electronic databases (MEDLINE 1946-2020, EMBASE 1947-2020, CINAHL 1937-2020, PEDro 1999-2020, and Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials 1991-2020) were systematically searched (until August 2020) for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated the effects of prehabilitation interventions in patients undergoing abdominal cancer surgery. This review included any form of prehabilitation either unimodal or multimodal that included whole body and/or respiratory exercises as a stand-alone intervention or in addition to other prehabilitation interventions (such as nutrition and psychology) compared to standard care. Results: Twenty-two studies were included in the systematic review and 21 studies in the meta-analysis. There was moderate quality of evidence that multimodal prehabilitation improves pre-operative functional capacity as measured by 6 min walk distance (Mean difference [MD] 33.09 metres, 95% CI 17.69-48.50; p = <0.01) but improvement in cardiorespiratory fitness such as preoperative oxygen consumption at peak exercise (VO2 peak; MD 1.74 mL/kg/min, 95% CI -0.03-3.50; p = 0.05) and anaerobic threshold (AT; MD 1.21 mL/kg/min, 95% CI -0.34-2.76; p = 0.13) were not significant. A reduction in hospital length of stay (MD 3.68 days, 95% CI 0.92-6.44; p = 0.009) was observed but no effect was observed for postoperative complications (Odds Ratio [OR] 0.81, 95% CI 0.55-1.18; p = 0.27), pulmonary complications (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.28-1.01; p = 0.05), hospital re-admission (OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.61-1.90; p = 0.81) or postoperative mortality (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.43-2.09, p = 0.90). Conclusion: Multimodal prehabilitation improves preoperative functional capacity with reduction in hospital length of stay. This supports the need for ongoing research on innovative cost-effective prehabilitation approaches, research within large multicentre studies to verify this effect and to explore implementation strategies within clinical practise.
Effects and duration of exercise-based prehabilitation in surgical therapy of colon and rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Roberto Falz,Christian Bischoff,René Thieme,Johannes Lässing,Matthias Mehdorn,Sigmar Stelzner,Martin Busse,Ines Gockel

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-022-04088-w

2022-06-13

Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology

Abstract:Abstract Purpose Functional capacity is an independent indicator of morbidity in colon and rectal cancer surgery. This systematic review describes the evaluated and synthesized effects of exercise prehabilitation depending on the duration of interventions on functional and postoperative outcomes in colon and rectal cancer surgery. Methods Three electronic databases (MEDLINE Pubmed, Web of Sciences, and Cochrane Registry) were systematically searched (January 2022) for controlled trials that investigated the effects of prehabilitation prior to colo-rectal cancer resection. Results Twenty-three studies were included in this systematic review and 14 in our meta-analyses assessing these outcomes: the 6 min walk distance (6MWD), postoperative overall complications, and length of stay (LOS). We observed a significant improvement in preoperative functional capacity as measured with 6MWD (mean difference: 30.8 m; 95% CI 13.3, 48.3; p = 0.0005) due to prehabilitation. No reductions in LOS (mean difference: – 0.27 days; 95% CI – 0.93, 0.40; p = 0.5) or postoperative overall complications (Odds ratio: 0.84; 95% CI 0.53, 1.31; p = 0.44) were observed. Prehabilitation lasting more than 3 weeks tended to lower overall complications (Odds ratio: 0.66; 95% CI 0.4, 1.1; p = 0.11). However, the prehabilitation time periods differed between colon and rectal carcinoma resections. Conclusion Prehabilitation while the patient is preparing to undergo surgery for colorectal carcinoma improves functional capacity; and might reduce postoperative overall complications, but does not shorten the LOS. The studies we reviewed differ in target variables, design, and the intervention’s time period. Multicenter studies with sufficient statistical power and differentiating between colon and rectal carcinoma are needed to develop implementation strategies in the health care system. Registration PROSPERO CRD42022310532

oncology
Pre-habilitation before colorectal cancer surgery could improve postoperative gastrointestinal function recovery: a case-matched study

F. Fabulas,P. Paisant,M. Dinomais,S. Mucci,C. Casa,P. Le Naoures,J. F. Hamel,J. Perrot,Aurélien Venara

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-022-02487-8

2022-03-08

Abstract:PurposeWhile its effect is controverted, multimodal pre-habilitation could be used to improve the postoperative course following colorectal cancer surgery. However, by increasing lean body mass, pre-habilitation could reduce the time needed to recover gastrointestinal (GI) functions. The aim was to assess the impact of pre-habilitation before colorectal cancer surgery on postoperative GI motility recovery.MethodsThis is a matched retrospective study based on a prospective database including patients undergoing colorectal surgery without pre-habilitation (NPH) (2016–2018) and with pre-habilitation (PH group) (2018–2019). The main outcome measure was the time to GI-3 recovery (tolerance to solid food and flatus and/or stools).ResultsOne hundred thirteen patients were included, 37 underwent pre-habilitation (32.7%). The patient's age, the surgical procedure, the surgical access, the rate of synchronous metastasis, the rate of preoperative chemoradiotherapy, and the rate of stoma were more important in the PH group. Conversely, the rate of patients with an ASA score of > 2 was higher in the NPH group. By matching patients according to age, gender and surgical procedure, 84 patients were compared (61 in the NPH group and 23 in the PH group). The mean of GI-3 recovery was significantly lower in the PH group. The other endpoints were not significantly different but time to GI function recovery and medical morbidity tended to be higher in the NPH group. Compliance with the enhanced recovery program was significantly higher in the PH group.ConclusionPre-habilitation before colorectal cancer surgery reduced time to GI function recovery and may increase compliance with the enhanced recovery program.
Prehabilitation in high-risk patients scheduled for major abdominal cancer surgery: a feasibility study

Jamie L Waterland,Hilmy Ismail,Catherine L Granger,Cameron Patrick,Linda Denehy,Bernhard Riedel,Centre for Prehabilitation and Perioperative Care,Anna Beaumont,Emma Bruns,Kate Burbury,Danika Carty,Rani Chahal,Georgina Christelis,Sonia Coleman,Jessica Crowe,Lara Edbrooke,Melanie Fairweather,Maria Ftanou,Kate Graham,Travis Hall,Simon Harrison,Alexander Heriot,Yesim Karabiyik,Kay Kenchington,Amit Khot,Erika Kotowicz,Naomi Lawrance,Debra Leung,Iris Liu,Jenelle Loeliger,Fiona Lynch,Alicia Martin,Jamie Norman,Kat O'Brien,Tom Poulton,Christina Prickett,Ian Richardson,Catherine Sinton,Amanda Siu,Emily Traer,Anya Traill

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13741-022-00263-2

2022-08-23

Abstract:Background: Patients presenting for major surgery with low cardiorespiratory fitness (deconditioning) and other modifiable risk factors are at increased risk of postoperative complications. This study investigated the feasibility of delivering prehabilitation in high-risk patients scheduled for major abdominal cancer surgery. Methods: Eligible patients in this single-center cohort study included patients with poor fitness (objectively assessed by cardiopulmonary exercise testing, CPET) scheduled for elective major abdominal cancer surgery. Patients were recruited to participate in a prehabilitation program that spanned up to 6 weeks pre-operatively and comprised aerobic and resistance exercise training, breathing exercise, and nutritional support. The primary outcome assessed pre-specified feasibility targets: recruitment >70%, retention >85%, and intervention adherence >70%. Secondary outcomes were assessed for improved pre-operative functional status and health-related quality of life and for postoperative complications. Results: Eighty-two (34%) out of 238 patients screened between April 2018 and December 2019 were eligible for recruitment. Fifty (61%) patients (52% males) with a median age of 71 (IQR, 63-77) years participated in the study. Baseline oxygen consumption the at anaerobic threshold and at peak exercise (mean±SD: 9.8±1.8 and 14.0±2.9 mL/kg/min, respectively) confirmed the deconditioned state of the study cohort. The retention rate within the prehabilitation program was 84%, with 42 participants returning for repeat CPET testing. While >60% of participants preferred to do home-based prehabilitation, adherence to the intervention was low-with only 12 (28%) and 15 (35%) of patients having self-reported compliance >70% with their exercise prescriptions. Conclusion: Our prehabilitation program in high-risk cancer surgery patients did not achieve pre-specified targets for recruitment, retention, and self-reported program adherence. These findings underpin the importance of implementation research and strategies for the prehabilitation programs in major surgery. Trial registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ( ACTRN12620000073909 ) retrospectively registered.
The impact of prehabilitation on outcomes in frail and high-risk patients undergoing major abdominal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Pavel Skořepa,Katherine L. Ford,Abdulaziz Alsuwaylihi,Dominic O’Connor,Carla M. Prado,Dhanny Gomez,Dileep N. Lobo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2024.01.020

IF: 7.643

2024-01-24

Clinical Nutrition

Abstract:Summary Background and aims Prehabilitation comprises multidisciplinary preoperative interventions including exercise, nutritional optimisation and psychological preparation aimed at improving surgical outcomes. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the impact of prehabilitation on postoperative outcomes in frail and high-risk patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. Methods Embase, Medline, CINAHAL and Cochrane databases were searched from January 2010 to January 2023 for randomised clinical trials (RCTs) and observational studies evaluating unimodal (exercise) or multimodal prehabilitation programmes. Meta-analysis was limited to length of stay (primary end point), severe postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo Classification ≥Grade 3) and the 6-minute walk test (6MWT). The analysis was performed using RevMan v5.4 software. Results Sixteen studies (6 RCTs, 10 observational) reporting on 3339 patients (1468 prehabilitation group, 1871 control group) were included. The median (interquartile range) age was 74.0 (71.0-78.4) years. Multimodal prehabilitation was applied in fifteen studies and unimodal in one. Meta-analysis of nine studies showed a reduction in hospital length of stay (weighted mean difference -1.07 days, 95%CI -1.60 to -0.53 days, P<0.0001, I 2 =19%). Ten studies addressed severe complications and a meta-analysis suggested a decline in occurrence by up to 44% (odds ratio 0.56, 95%CI 0.37 to 0.82, P<0.004, I 2 =51%). Four studies provided data on preoperative 6MWT. The pooled weighted mean difference was 40.1 m (95%CI 32.7 to 47.6 m, P<0.00001, I 2 =24%), favouring prehabilitation. Conclusion Given the significant impact on shortening length of stay and reducing severe complications, prehabilitation should be encouraged in frail, older and high-risk adult patients undergoing major abdominal surgery.

nutrition & dietetics
Der Anteil der einzelnen Zellarten an dem Holz der Rotbuche

H. Schulz

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02605772

1957-03-01

Abstract:
Multimodal prehabilitation service for patients with colorectal cancer: the challenges of implementation

Henry Boyle,Aidan Fullbrook,Alasdair Wills,Isla Veal,Nicola Peat,Zainab Al-Noor,Rebecca Bradshaw,Arlene Raga,Aoife Hegarty,Alison Hainsworth,Minahi Ilyas,Pele Banugo,Heena Bidd

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002064

2023-05-01

BMJ Open Quality

Abstract:Prehabilitation has been shown to improve outcomes for patients undergoing major surgery; benefits include reductions in length of hospital stay and postoperative complications. Multimodal prehabilitation programmes lead to improved patient engagement and experience. This report describes implementation of a personalised multimodal prehabilitation programme for patients awaiting colorectal cancer surgery. We aim to highlight the successes, challenges and future direction of our programme. Patients listed for colorectal cancer surgery were referred for initial prehabilitation assessment. The prehabilitation group were assessed by specialist physiotherapists, dieticians and psychologists. An individualised programme was developed for each patient, aiming to optimise preoperative functional capacity and enhance physical and psychological resilience. Clinical primary outcome measures were recorded and compared with contemporaneous controls. For those undergoing prehabilitation, a set of secondary functional, nutritional and psychological outcomes were recorded at initial assessment and on completion of the programme. 61 patients were enrolled in the programme from December 2021 to October 2022. 12 patients were excluded as they received less than 14 days prehabilitation or had incomplete data. The remaining 49 patients received a median duration of 24 days prehabilitation (range 15–91 days). The results show statistically significant improvements in the following functional outcome measures after prehabilitation: Rockwood scores, maximal inspiratory pressures, International Physical Activity Questionnaire Score and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness - Fatigue Score. There was a lower postoperative complication rate in the prehabilitation group when compared with a control group (50% vs 67%). This quality improvement project has 3 Plan–Do–Study–Act (PDSA) cycles. PDSA 1 demonstrates prehabilitation can be successfully imbedded within a colorectal surgical unit and that patients are grateful for the service. PDSA 2 provides the project’s first complete data set and demonstrates functional improvements in patients undergoing prehabilitation. The third PDSA cycle is ongoing and aims to refine the prehabilitation interventions and improve clinical outcomes for patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery.
Surgical Prehabilitation in Patients with Gastrointestinal Cancers: Impact of Unimodal and Multimodal Programs on Postoperative Outcomes and Prospects for New Therapeutic Strategies—A Systematic Review

Julie Mareschal,Alexandra Hemmer,Jonathan Douissard,Yves Marc Dupertuis,Tinh-Hai Collet,Thibaud Koessler,Christian Toso,Frédéric Ris,Laurence Genton

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15061881

2023-03-22

Cancers

Abstract:The advantages of prehabilitation in surgical oncology are unclear. This systematic review aims to (1) evaluate the latest evidence of preoperative prehabilitation interventions on postoperative outcomes after gastrointestinal (GI) cancer surgery and (2) discuss new potential therapeutic targets as part of prehabilitation. Randomized controlled trials published between January 2017 and August 2022 were identified through Medline. The population of interest was oncological patients undergoing GI surgery. Trials were considered if they evaluated prehabilitation interventions (nutrition, physical activity, probiotics and symbiotics, fecal microbiota transplantation, and ghrelin receptor agonists), alone or combined, on postoperative outcomes. Out of 1180 records initially identified, 15 studies were retained. Evidence for the benefits of unimodal interventions was limited. Preoperative multimodal programs, including nutrition and physical activity with or without psychological support, showed improvement in postoperative physical performance, muscle strength, and quality of life in patients with esophagogastric and colorectal cancers. However, there was no benefit for postoperative complications, hospital length of stay, hospital readmissions, and mortality. No trial evaluated the impact of fecal microbiota transplantation or oral ghrelin receptor agonists. Further studies are needed to confirm our findings, identify patients who are more likely to benefit from surgical prehabilitation, and harmonize interventions.

oncology

High stathmin expression is a marker for poor clinical outcome in endometrial cancer: An NRG oncology group/gynecologic oncology group study.

Prehabilitation in Modern Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Comprehensive Review

Physical activity programmes for patients undergoing neo-adjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Prehabilitation and its Outcomes in Cancer Patients: A Narrative Review

Can we "prehabilitate" pancreatic cancer patients prior to surgery?A critical appraisal of the literature

Temporary and permanent modifications to a single strain of mouse scrapie on transmission to rats and hamsters.

Prehab, ERAS, Rehab: A patient care continuum around colo-rectal surgery: Prehabilitation combined with ERAS and rehabilitation to reduce morbidity and hospital stay

A systematic review and meta-analysis of high-quality randomized controlled trials on the role of prehabilitation programs in colorectal surgery

Sex peptide and the sperm effect in Drosophila melanogaster

Multimodal prehabilitation in patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review

Prehabilitation to improve postoperative outcomes in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis undergoing hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC): A scoping review

Multimodal prehabilitation in elective oncological colorectal surgery enhances preoperative physical fitness: a single center prospective real-world data analysis

Exploring the acceptability of and adherence to prehabilitation and rehabilitation in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Efficacy of Prehabilitation Including Exercise on Postoperative Outcomes Following Abdominal Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Effects and duration of exercise-based prehabilitation in surgical therapy of colon and rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Pre-habilitation before colorectal cancer surgery could improve postoperative gastrointestinal function recovery: a case-matched study

Prehabilitation in high-risk patients scheduled for major abdominal cancer surgery: a feasibility study

The impact of prehabilitation on outcomes in frail and high-risk patients undergoing major abdominal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Der Anteil der einzelnen Zellarten an dem Holz der Rotbuche

Multimodal prehabilitation service for patients with colorectal cancer: the challenges of implementation

Surgical Prehabilitation in Patients with Gastrointestinal Cancers: Impact of Unimodal and Multimodal Programs on Postoperative Outcomes and Prospects for New Therapeutic Strategies—A Systematic Review