Monitoring test under nonparametric random effects model

Jiahua Chen,Pengfei Li,Yukun Liu,James V. Zidek

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1610.05809

2016-10-18

Methodology

Abstract:Factors such as climate change, forest fire and plague of insects, lead to concerns on the mechanical strength of plantation materials. To address such concerns, these products must be closely monitored. This leads to the need of updating lumber quality monitoring procedures in American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard D1990 (adopted in 1991) from time to time. A key component of monitoring is an effective method for detecting the change in lower percentiles of the solid lumber strength based on multiple samples. In a recent study by Verrill et al.\ (2015), eight statistical tests proposed by wood scientists were examined thoroughly based on real and simulated data sets. These tests are found unsatisfactory in differing aspects such as seriously inflated false alarm rate when observations are clustered, suboptimal power properties, or having inconvenient ad hoc rejection regions. A contributing factor behind suboptimal performance is that most of these tests are not developed to detect the change in quantiles. In this paper, we use a nonparametric random effects model to handle the within cluster correlations, composite empirical likelihood to avoid explicit modelling of the correlations structure, and a density ratio model to combine the information from multiple samples. In addition, we propose a cluster-based bootstrapping procedure to construct the monitoring test on quantiles which satisfactorily controls the type I error in the presence of within cluster correlation. The performance of the test is examined through simulation experiments and a real world example. The new method is generally applicable, not confined to the motivating example.