Abstract:We investigate how gender affects ethical outcomes in repeated same- or mixed-gender interactions. In our first study (N = 681), we use an experimental slippery-slope audit setting (Gino and Bazerman, 2009), in which an "auditor" makes an approval decision about the emerging unethical behavior of an "estimator" whose gender has been made salient. Based on previous evidence, unethical behavior is more likely to be accepted when it emerges gradually compared to a situation where it occurs abruptly. While we do not find a general slippery-slope effect across the whole sample, a significant slippery-slope effect is detected when the estimator is male (d = 0.36) or when the auditor is female (d = 0.27). We observe no slippery-slope effects in same-gender estimator-auditor constellations. However, in mixed-gender constellations, we find opposite effects: when male estimators are audited by females, we observe a significant slippery-slope effect (d = 0.53), driven by a high approval rate in the slippery-slope treatment. Conversely, when female estimators are audited by males, the approval rate increases in the abrupt treatment (d = 0.33). To better understand the drivers of these findings, we asked a different sample of participants (N = 90) to indicate the level of competence or honesty they attribute to male and female estimators in the auditing task. Responses suggest that the detected slippery-slope effects may be driven by auditors (especially females), attributing more competence to male estimators (d = 0.62), which is particularly relevant in the slippery-slope treatment where unethical behavior is difficult to detect. Moreover, our finding that male auditors are particularly inclined to approve overvaluations by females in the abrupt treatment, where unethical behavior becomes salient, may be driven by a more ethical assessment of female estimators (d = 0.90).

Slipping on stereotypes – Interactive gender effects in the erosion of ethical behavior

A Registered Report on Gender Bias in Interpersonal Dishonesty: Are Females and Males Cheated Differently?

A meta-analysis of gender stereotypes and bias in experimental simulations of employment decision making.

Gender composition predicts gender bias: A meta-reanalysis of hiring discrimination audit experiments

Gender Attitudes in the Judiciary: Evidence from US Circuit Courts

Prescriptive Gender Stereotypes and Backlash Toward Agentic Women

Inside the Black Box of Organizational Life: The Gendered Language of Performance Assessment

Moral character and competence judgments of sexual harassers and fraudsters in academic and business contexts

Gender rating gap in online reviews

Are Sex Effects on Ethical Decision-Making Fake or Real? A Meta-Analysis on the Contaminating Role of Social Desirability Response Bias

Moral commitment to gender equality increases (mis)perceptions of gender bias in hiring

How Workplace Accounting Experience and Gender Affect Ethical Judgment

Testing the GRIP: An Empirical Examination of the Gender Roles Inhibiting Prosociality Model

Does Information Disclosure Affect the Gender Gap in Bidding Behavior? Empirical Evidence from a Natural Experiment on a Large Online Labor Platform

Interventions That Affect Gender Bias in Hiring: A Systematic Review

Whose misbehavior is inexcusable—And which one? Job‐related discrimination against ethnic minority and majority women

Effects of biological and psychological gender, age cohort, and interviewer gender on attitudes toward gender-inclusive/exclusive language

Gender discrimination and the backlash effect in recruitment and dismissal processes: experimental evidence from Slovakia

Linda's Cars versus Dominik's Dolls: How Do Pedagogical Educators in Training React to Children's Violations of Gender Stereotypes?

Effect of employee gender and behavioral style on the evaluations of male and female banking executives.

The effect of fast and slow decision-making on equity-efficiency tradeoffs and moral repugnance