Primary and secondary prevention of allergic sensitization

D. Hide

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/PPUL.1950230808

1997-04-01

Abstract:It is usually accepted that the predisposition to atopic disease encompasses at least 20 % of the population. They are consequently vulnerable to a wide spectrum of disease, ranging from trivial to life-threatening. Moreover, the implication on the part of the individual for a normal life, at school, work or play, may be considerable. It is beyond argument that the additional cost to society of providing health care and social benefits to those afflicted is very substantial. In the United Kingdom, the cost of providing primary and secondary care for those with asthma alone was estimated in 1990 to be 400 million pounds per annum• The additional consequence of social benefits and absence from employment might mean the real cost of asthma to the economy is closer to one billion pounds per annum. Thus, there is a clear incentive, both for the individual and the state, to try to diminish or prevent allergic disease. At present, there is no acceptable method of approaching the genetic influence into the equation, so attention must be directed at identifying the high risk families and attempting to influence sensitization to allergens. It is a reasonable assumption that there is a stage in the development of the atopic individual when he or she has no specific IgE and therefore has not been sensitized. Although, it is known that the fetus produces endogenous IgE at the end of the first trimester, most researchers have found few or no infants to have measurable specific IgE in cord blood• As a population is followed through infancy into the first years of life, the percentage demonstrating a specific IgE response either to skin prick testing or to some method of quantitative assay of IgE such as the Radioallergosorbent test (RAST) increases• Initially, this response is primarily to food antigens but rapidly aero-allergens produce sensitization. The failure to detect IgE in cord-blood, and the lack of success of measures designed to restrict sensitization in utero by controlling maternal diet during the latter weeks of pregnancy, have led to the presumption that significant sensitization occurs only after birth• Recent evidence