[Questionnaire to Assess the Work-Related Orientation of Medical Rehabilitation from the Perspective of the Rehabilitants (WMR-R): Cross-Sectional Study Comparing the Short and Long Versions]

Wolfgang Bürger,Rüdiger Nübling,Marco Streibelt

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1668-7797

Abstract:Background: The user perception of the work-related treatment is of great importance for the further development and success of work-related medical rehabilitation (WMR). The German Pension Insurance Fund (Deutsche Rentenversicherung DRV Bund) has therefore supported the development of the questionnaire WMR-R that can be used to assess the quality of the structure, process and results of work-related rehabilitation treatment from the patient's point of view. This paper presents a short version and compares it with the long version. Methods: Based on a representative sample stratified by indication, employed rehabilitants up to the age of 65 were randomly selected to be questioned 6 months after their rehabilitation with a long version (N=28276) or a short version (N=6611) of WMR-R. In addition, routine data of the German Pension Insurance Fund were included. 27 items each of the long version and 8 items of the short version are added up to a total score and compared with regard to test statistical quality criteria and sample sensitivity. Results: Participation rates were slightly higher in the short version (31%, N=2115) than in the long version (28%, N=8019). The processing quality in both versions is comparable. The short and long versions correlate with each other at r=0.96 (p<0.01). Both versions have similar validity characteristics and separate well between WMR and standard rehabilitation. Both versions are robust to demographic, disease-related and socio-medical risk factors. Rehabilitants with addiction and psychosomatic as well as neurological diseases rate their rehabilitation as significantly more work-oriented compared to other indications, especially pneumology. Discussion: Due to the low survey effort and the simple evaluation and interpretation, the short version is particularly suitable for routine surveys of WMR care quality. The long version allows a differentiated recording of the WMR offer of rehabilitation facilities in the sense of strength/weakness analyses.