Oral therapies and food: to eat or not to eat?

A. Azvolinsky

2012-02-25

Oncology

Abstract:The treatment of cancer is shifting to increasingly more oral pills. Most oncology drug labels recommend taking the pills while fasting though often there is evidence that food increases bioavailability of the medication as much as four-fold.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Content Validition and Psychometric Evaluation of the Self-efficacy and Performance in Self-management Support Instrument for Physiotherapists

Anita Feleus,Lotte Wevers,Dieuwke Schiphof,John Verhoef,Susanne van Hooft,AnneLoes van Staa

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2023.06.008

Abstract:Objective: To develop and psychometrically test the Self-Efficacy and Performance in Self-Management Support instrument for physiotherapists (SEPSS-PT), based on the SEPSS-36, the corresponding instrument for nurses. Design: Instrument development including content validation and psychometric evaluation (construct validity, factor structure, and reliability). Setting: Data were collected from literature, expertmeetings, and online questionnaire PARTICIPANTS: Next to a comprehensive literature study, experts (self-management experts (n=2); physiotherapists (n=10); patients (n=6)) and physiotherapists and physiotherapy students (n=334), participated in different stages of the study. Interventions: Not applicable. Main outcome measures: Not applicable. A literature study (n=42 reviews) and consultations with physiotherapists and patients identified the specific content for physiotherapy. The Five-A's model and overarching competencies of "supportive partnership attitude", were used to structure the items. Psychometric evaluation of the draft questionnaire (40 items) was tested in a sample of 334 physiotherapists and physiotherapy students from the Netherlands, of whom 33 filled out the questionnaire twice to establish the test-retest reliability. Results: Confirmatory factor analyses revealed satisfactory fit indices for both the 6-factor model and hierarchical model, with best fit for the 6-factor model. The questionnaire discriminated between physiotherapists and physiotherapy students, and between physiotherapists who did or did not consider self-management support important. The overall internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) was high, both for the self-efficacy and the performance items. In most of the subscales, test-retest intra-class correlation coefficients for both overall self-efficacy and performance were good, but in 3 subscales insufficient for performance. Conclusion: The SEPSS-PT questionnaire is a 40-item, Likert-scaled instrument with good content and construct validity, good internal consistency and reliability, and sufficient test-retest reliability. Future research in a larger and more diverse sample could confirm stability and discriminating power.
Psychometric properties of the living with long term conditions scale in an English-speaking population living with long term conditions in the UK

Leire Ambrosio,Kelly Hislop-Lennie,Nestor Serrano-Fuentes,Corine Driessens,Mari Carmen Portillo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077978

IF: 3.006

2024-01-12

BMJ Open

Abstract:Objective To present the psychometric properties of the living with long-term condition (LwLTCs) scale in an English-speaking population of people with different LTCs. Design An observational and cross-sectional study, with retest was conducted. Psychometric properties including feasibility, internal consistency, confirmatory factor analysis, reproducibility and content validity were tested. Setting The study took place across the UK via primary care surgeries and voluntary organisations, between December 2021 and June 2022. Participants The study included 577 patients living with different LTCs, as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, arthritis, chronic heart failure, Parkinson's disease, chronic kidney disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Inclusion criteria included: (a) having been diagnosed with one or more of the conditions; (b) being able to read, understand and answer written questionnaires; (c) being fluent in English and (d) being able to provide written informed consent. Patients were involved in the design and pilot study of the scale. Results A total sample of 577 people with an age range of 37–97 years (98±9.65) were recruited. Internal consistency of the total 26-item LwLTCs scale score was excellent (ordinal alpha=0.90) but confirmatory factor analysis showed better fit indices (Normed Fit Index=0.96; standardised root mean square residual=0.051; Goodness of Fit Index=0.98) for a 20-item LwLTCs scale. Conclusions A shorter version of the LwLTCs scale, with just 20 items and with excellent psychometric properties, is recommended. Having a short scale is key when considering the implementation of the scale in clinical practice to develop person-centred pathways and more comprehensive care plans.

medicine, general & internal
The Cardiac Rehabilitation Inventory: A New Method of Tailoring Patient Support

J. Shearman,D. Micklewright,G. Sandercock,P. Parker,R. Davison,Laura Northeast,Jane E Hardcastle,M. Jermy

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/JCN.0000000000000220

2016-03-01

Abstract:Background:Uptake and adherence to cardiac rehabilitation (CR) are low, and a contributing factor to this may be the practical difficulties of providing a tailored CR environment suited to individual preferences and needs. Objective:The aim of this study was to develop and test a short questionnaire that CR practitioners can use to understand individual patient need and tailor support accordingly. Methods:A conceptual framework of engagement in CR was derived from a comprehensive literature review and the content analysis of semistructured interviews with 15 CR patients. The conceptual framework was used to construct the first version of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Inventory (CRI), which comprised 42 items. Responses on the CRI were measured using a 5-point Likert scale. The CRI was administered to 380 phase III and IV CR patients, and factor analysis (FA) was used to identify salient CR engagement factors. Results:The simplest structure found using FA was three 6-item subscales that all had good levels of internal consistency (Cronbach’s &agr;) and were labeled (a) outcome anxiety, &agr; = .726; (2) process anxiety, &agr; = .724; and (3) autonomy, &agr; = .653. The 3-factor CRI model was verified using confirmatory FA (CMin/df = 3.2, root-mean-square error of approximation = 0.073). Attenders were found to have higher levels of outcome anxiety than nonattenders (P < .001), and precontemplator nonattenders were found to have lower autonomy compared with attenders (P < .001). Standard multiple regression analysis indicated outcome anxiety was a strong predictor of CR intentions (r2 = 0.716), followed by autonomy (r2 = 0.110) and process anxiety (r2 = 0.031). Conclusions:The CRI is a reliable method of measuring CR outcome anxiety, process anxiety, and autonomy. These CRI measurements provide rehabilitation practitioners with valuable information that can help provide individual tailored support.

Medicine,Psychology
[Quality assurance in food production: a challenge for veterinary food hygiene?].

H. Schraft,F. Untermann

Schweizer Archiv für Tierheilkunde

Abstract:Production liability, safety regulations as well as marketing strategies are important motivations for companies to establish in-house quality control measures which can be certified by an independent control body. Companies that advertise quality control measures place pressure on opposition companies to follow suite. It follows that certification in foodstuff production will lead to a chain reaction and spread quickly to other companies. In the establishment of a quality assurance system it is just as important to distinguish between quality control and quality assurance as it is to consider the guidelines laid down in the ISO-Standards 9000-9004. After certification according to the ISO-Standards, which dictates certain forms of quality assurance, there is no guarantee that all important risks, such as hygiene risks introduced with technology, can be excluded. In terms of public health monitoring an important responsibility awaits veterinary public health. Strategies and consequences for official monitoring of foodstuffs are presented and discussed.
Psychometric Assessment of an Item Bank for Adaptive Testing on Patient-Reported Experience of Care Environment for Severe Mental Illness: Validation Study

Sara Fernandes,Yann Brousse,Xavier Zendjidjian,Delphine Cano,Jérémie Riedberger,Pierre-Michel Llorca,Ludovic Samalin,Daniel Dassa,Christian Trichard,Vincent Laprevote,Anne Sauvaget,Mocrane Abbar,David Misdrahi,Fabrice Berna,Christophe Lancon,Nathalie Coulon,Wissam El-Hage,Pierre-Emmanuel Rozier,Michel Benoit,Bruno Giordana,Alejandra Caqueo-Urízar,Dong Keon Yon,Bach Tran,Pascal Auquier,Guillaume Fond,Laurent Boyer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/49916

2024-05-16

Abstract:Background: The care environment significantly influences the experiences of patients with severe mental illness and the quality of their care. While a welcoming and stimulating environment enhances patient satisfaction and health outcomes, psychiatric facilities often prioritize staff workflow over patient needs. Addressing these challenges is crucial to improving patient experiences and outcomes in mental health care. Objective: This study is part of the Patient-Reported Experience Measure for Improving Quality of Care in Mental Health (PREMIUM) project and aims to establish an item bank (PREMIUM-CE) and to develop computerized adaptive tests (CATs) to measure the experience of the care environment of adult patients with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, or major depressive disorder. Methods: We performed psychometric analyses including assessments of item response theory (IRT) model assumptions, IRT model fit, differential item functioning (DIF), item bank validity, and CAT simulations. Results: In this multicenter cross-sectional study, 498 patients were recruited from outpatient and inpatient settings. The final PREMIUM-CE 13-item bank was sufficiently unidimensional (root mean square error of approximation=0.082, 95% CI 0.067-0.097; comparative fit index=0.974; Tucker-Lewis index=0.968) and showed an adequate fit to the IRT model (infit mean square statistic ranging between 0.7 and 1.0). DIF analysis revealed no item biases according to gender, health care settings, diagnosis, or mode of study participation. PREMIUM-CE scores correlated strongly with satisfaction measures (r=0.69-0.78; P<.001) and weakly with quality-of-life measures (r=0.11-0.21; P<.001). CAT simulations showed a strong correlation (r=0.98) between CAT scores and those of the full item bank, and around 79.5% (396/498) of the participants obtained a reliable score with the administration of an average of 7 items. Conclusions: The PREMIUM-CE item bank and its CAT version have shown excellent psychometric properties, making them reliable measures for evaluating the patient experience of the care environment among adults with severe mental illness in both outpatient and inpatient settings. These measures are a valuable addition to the existing landscape of patient experience assessment, capturing what truly matters to patients and enhancing the understanding of their care experiences. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02491866; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02491866.
Peritoneal macrophages of guinea pig possibly lack LTC4 synthetase.

M. Abe,Y. Kawazoe,H. Tsunematsu,N. Shigematsu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-291X(85)80119-4

1985-02-28

Abstract:
Omental transposition for closure of median sternotomy following severe mediastinal and vascular infection.

J. Seguin,D. Loisance

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1378/CHEST.88.5.684

IF: 9.6

1985-11-01

Chest

Abstract:Three patients suffering from severe sternal wound infection, underlying mediastinitis, and aortic sepsis were successfully treated by radical debridement of the infected tissues and mediastinal transposition of the greater omentum. Sternomediastinal antibiotic irrigation is an accepted treatment for postoperative sternomediastinitis, but appears insufficient when infection involves underlying vascular or cardiac structures. In such circumstances, extensive sternal debridement is mandatory and healthy tissue transposition, such as omentum, is a valuable alternative.
Measurement properties of a modified Reintegration to Normal Living Index in a community-dwelling adult rehabilitation population

Alison Miller,Lindy Clemson,Natasha Lannin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2011.553707

2011-01-01

Disability and Rehabilitation

Abstract:PURPOSE: To examine the validity and reliability of a modified Reintegration to Normal Living Index (mRNL Index) with a sample of community-dwelling adults with mixed diagnoses.METHOD: Forty-six adults (mean 55.2 ± 20.3 years) were recruited through convenience sampling from outpatient rehabilitation services. They completed the mRNL Index, Community Integration Measure (CIM) and Life Space Assessment (LSA) and were invited to complete them again 2 weeks later.RESULTS: Construct validity of the mRNL Index was confirmed by good fit to the Rasch measurement model. The mRNL Index demonstrated acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.80), as did the Daily Functioning subscale (Cronbach's α = 0.80) and Personal Integration subscale (Cronbach's α = 0.82). Test-retest reliability was also acceptable (intraclass correlation coefficient (3,1) = 0.83, p = .0001). As hypothesised, the LSA did not correlate with the Personal Integration subscale (Spearman rho = 0.08) and moderately correlated to the Daily Functioning subscale (Spearman rho = 0.59). The CIM was moderately correlated with the Personal Integration subscales (Spearman rho = 0.54) and the Daily Functioning subscale (Spearman rho = 0.53), though higher correlation was expected with the latter.CONCLUSION: Modifications to the phrasing, rating scale and subscales improved the validity of the original RNL Index for a mixed rehabilitation, community-dwelling population.

rehabilitation
Development and measurement properties of the AxEL (attitude toward education and advice for low-back-pain) questionnaire

Edel T O'Hagan,Ian W Skinner,Matthew D Jones,Emma L Karran,Adrian C Traeger,Aidan G Cashin,Benedict M Wand,Siobhan M Schabrun,Sean O'Neill,Ian A Harris,James H McAuley

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-021-01908-4

2022-01-10

Abstract:Introduction: Clinician time and resources may be underutilised if the treatment they offer does not match patient expectations and attitudes. We developed a questionnaire (AxEL-Q) to guide clinicians toward elements of first-line care that are pertinent to their patients with low back pain. Methods: We used guidance from the COSMIN consortium to develop the questionnaire and evaluated it in a sample of people with low back pain of any duration. Participants were recruited from the community, were over 18 years and fluent in English. Statements that represented first-line care were identified. Semantic scales were used to measure attitude towards these statements. These items were combined to develop the questionnaire draft. Construct validity was evaluated with exploratory factor analysis and hypotheses testing, comparing to the Back Beliefs Questionnaire and modified Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire. Reliability was evaluated and floor and ceiling effects calculated. Results: We recruited 345 participants, and had complete data for analysis for 313 participants. The questionnaire draft was reduced to a 3-Factor questionnaire through exploratory factor analysis. Factor 1 comprised 9 items and evaluated Attitude toward staying active, Factor 2 comprised 4 items and evaluated Attitude toward low back pain being rarely caused by a serious health problem, Factor 3 comprised 4 items and evaluated Attitude toward not needing to know the cause of back pain to manage it effectively. There was a strong inverse association between each factor and the Back Beliefs Questionnaire and a moderate positive association with the modified Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire. Each independent factor demonstrated acceptable internal consistency; Cronbach α Factor 1 = 0.92, Factor 2 = 0.91, Factor 3 = 0.90 and adequate interclass correlation coefficients; Factor 1 = 0.71, Factor 2 = 0.73, Factor 3 = 0.79. Conclusion: This study demonstrates acceptable construct validity and reliability of the AxEL-Q, providing clinicians with an insight into the likelihood of patients following first-line care at the outset.
Doctors' attitudes to information systems: a survey of Derbyshire general practitioners.

R. Madeley,D. Metcalfe

1978-11-01

Abstract:This paper describes the results of a survey of all 365 general practitioners in Derbyshire. It deals in particular with their attitudes to information systems and the factors which affect them. The results show that there is much more interest in continuous data collection from primary care than is often supposed. This is particularly so among younger general practitioners. The survey thus describes the possible interest in information recording amongst a typical population of general practitioners.
The Work Experience Survey - Rheumatic conditions (United Kingdom): Psychometric properties and identifying the workplace barriers of employed people with inflammatory arthritis receiving vocational rehabilitation

Alison Hammond,Rachel O'Brien,Sarah Woodbridge,Jennifer Parker,Angela Ching

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/msc.1835

Musculoskeletal Care

Abstract:Objective: The aims were to: revise the Work Experience Survey-Rheumatic Conditions (WES-RC- UK), a work assessment listing 142 workplace barriers; investigate content validity, reliability, and concurrent validity; update the accompanying WES-RC and WORKWELL Solutions Manuals; and investigate workplace barriers of people with inflammatory arthritis. Methods: Rheumatology therapists, following vocational rehabilitation (VR) training, assessed participants in the WORKWELL VR trial using the WES-RC. Data were extracted from the WES-RC to identify the frequency of workplace barriers, and from trial baseline questionnaires (e.g., Work Limitations Questionnaire-25 (WLQ-25). Barriers reported by ≤5 participants were considered for removal. WES-RC content validity was assessed by linking to the International Classification of Functioning, Health, and Disability Core Set for VR (ICF-VR). Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's α and concurrent validity by correlating the total number of workplace barriers reported with WLQ-25 scores. Results: WES-RCs were completed with 116 employed participants: 79% women, age 48.72 (SD 9.49) years, and 57% working full-time. The WES-RC was reduced to 121 barriers. Content validity was good, with 73/90 ICF-VR items linked. Cronbach's α = 0.92, that is, suitable for individual use. Concurrent validity was moderate: WLQ-25 (rs = 0.40). The three most common barriers were Physical Job Demands (100%: e.g., mobility 99%; hand use 74%), Mental, Time, Energy, Emotional Job Demands (91%, e.g., concentration 47%, remembering 41%); Getting Ready for and Travel to Work (87%, e.g., driving 60%). Conclusion: The WES-RC (UK) has good content validity, reliability, and concurrent validity. The wide range of barriers emphasises the need for biopsychosocial work rehabilitation.
How much testing can a kid take? Feasibility of collecting pediatric patient experience ratings of neuropsychological and psychological assessment

Erin F Jones,Alison Pritchard,Lisa A Jacobson,E Mark Mahone,T Andrew Zabel

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21622965.2021.1917410

Abstract:Parent-reported satisfaction is an important outcome measure in pediatric neuropsychology; however, self-report of patient experience following lengthy pediatric assessments has been under-investigated. Written at a first grade reading level and utilizing touch screen and read-aloud functionality, a set of 15 operationally-focused items were administered to evaluate pediatric patient experience of neuropsychological and psychological assessment. One-hundred ninety-seven clinically-referred patients (M age = 11.74, SD = 3.17, range = 5.86-19.02 years, 56% male) answered the post-assessment survey. The majority of patients (n = 167; 84.77%) accurately completed the initial two validity items, even though many had parent-reported ratings of reading difficulty. More than a third of patients indicated that the assessment made them tired (39%), but fewer patients reported feeling bored (13%) or worried (7%) during testing. Moreover, most patients reported having fun (66%) and many indicated that testing was preferable to other activities typically performed at that same time (i.e., school, homework). Responses to items assessing the child's interactions with the clinician and the child's effort provided little variation and were answered in a socially desirable manner. Items that focused upon the child's personal response to the assessment appointment (e.g., boredom, worry), however, elicited greater variance in patient responding. In general, patient responses did not suggest that assessment was an aversive experience. Overall, these proof of concept findings suggest that most referred pediatric patients, even those with learning issues, may be capable of independently navigating and completing self-report questionnaires while providing differential responses to items assessing clinical experience. Self-report questionnaires appear to be a feasible method for acquiring pediatric patient-reported experiences of assessment.
Chemical reactivity and intracavitary application of alkylating sugar alcohol derivatives.

S. Kerpel-Fronius,J. Csetényi,L. Hegedüs,I. Horváth,G. Ringwald,B. Töttössy,S. Eckhardt

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000225507

Oncology

Abstract:Lycurium [1,4-di-(methylsulfonyloxy-ethylamino)-1,4-didesoxy-erythrioldimethylsulfonate; R-74; NSC-122402] undergoes rapid hydrolysis in aqueous solutions. The concentration of the alkylating compound(s), demonstrated by the 4-(4'-nitrobenzyl)pyridine reaction, decreases approximately by 80% in 10 min following the dissolution of the drug in saline. In patients peak plasma concentration of radioactivity after the intracavitary injection of 14C-labelled Lycurim is observed between 4 and 6 h. It is assumed, therefore, that only a negligible amount of pharmacologically active alkylating compounds reaches the circulation after intracavitary application. This conclusion is supported by clinical experience showing that intracavitary administration of the same amount of Lycurim causes much milder systemic side-effects than intravenous injection. A dose escalation study was started to determine the applicability of Lycurim in the form of high volume intraperitoneal instillation ('belly bath') for the treatment of ovarian cancer.
DEVELOPMENT AND CROSS-VALIDATION OF A SHORT QUESTIONNAIRE TO EVALUATE SELF-REPORTED POSITIVE HEALTH; A CROSS SECTIONAL PANEL STUDY OF STRUCTURAL VALIDITY AMONG A GENERAL DUTCH POPULATION

Lenny M.W. Nahar-van Venrooij Sr.,Margot J. Metz Sr.,Marja van Vliet Sr.,Vera P. van Druten,Babette C. van der Zwaard Sr.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.26.24312579

2024-08-26

Abstract:Objectives: In this study it was aimed to further develop and cross-validate a short questionnaire to measure self-reported Positive Health in general (Dutch) populations for evaluative purposes, stemming from the original 42 items of the My Positive Health dialogue tool (MPH). Positive Health refers to ′health from the perspective of patients and citizens′ following the concept of Huber et. al. Design and setting: A cross sectional study was performed among a panel representative for the general adult Dutch population living at home. Participants: Response rate was 76%, 1327 of a total of 2457 respondents were female, and mean age (year) was 53.3 ± 17.8. Methods: First, item reduction was carried out through content discussions following statistical output retrieved from factor structures and loadings, inter-item correlations (IIC) and internal consistency (Cronbach′s alphas). Next, among the other half of the study population, measurement properties for the developed short questionnaire were calculated using goodness of fit indices from confirmatory factor analyses (CFA). Results: The item reduction process (n=1199) resulted in a questionnaire of 22 items (PH22) with a four-factor structure and explained variance of 62.4%. Cronbach′s alphas were 0.84, 0.92, 0.81, and 0.78 for the renamed factors ′Physical fitness′ (5 items), ′Contentment with life′ (9 items), ′Daily life management′ (5 items) and ′Future perspective′ (3 items), respectively. Cross validation (n=1258) showed adequate goodness of fit indices of the PH22, based on both first- and second-order CFA. The scores of the PH22 were normally distributed. No floor or ceiling effects were present. Conclusions: A short 22 item questionnaire to measure self-reported Positive Health in a general (Dutch) population for evaluative purposes such as scientific or policy research at Positive Health or patient-centered interventions was developed and cross-validated, named PH22. This study supports its structural validity. To use this questionnaire in practice its test-retest reliability and responsiveness should be known also. Future research has to reveal this.

Health Systems and Quality Improvement
Preliminary evaluation of a questionnaire for assessing fidelity of early intervention for psychosis services

Miriam Kinkaid,Rebecca Fuhrer,Stephen McGowan,Ashok Malla

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-024-02703-4

2024-08-05

Abstract:Purpose: Fast, easy, and cost-effective methods are needed for fidelity assessment, quality improvement initiatives, and population-based studies in Early Intervention for Psychosis (EIP) services. Having an online questionnaire assessing the fidelity of EIP services, completed by staff self-reports, and having evidence of reliability and validity, could fill that gap. We assess the reliability and validity of the Early Intervention for Psychosis Services Fidelity Questionnaire (EIPS-FQ), developed in Part I of this set of papers. Methods: A convenience sample of 10 EIP teams in England was used. Two staff members completed online questionnaires assessing recent and past fidelity. An external rater completed the same questionnaire for the two time periods, using a random sample of patient medical records, program documentation, and interviews with staff. The intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated to assess inter-rater reliability. Validity was assessed using Bland-Altman plots, absolute mean differences, and the ICC. Results: The fidelity score measuring recent fidelity ranged from 54.2 to 82.7, out of a possible 100. The ICC assessing reliability of the fidelity score was 0.40 (95% CI: 0.0-0.81). The ICCs for the fidelity sub-category scores ranged from 0 to 0.76. Two sub-categories, comprehensive assessments and family involvement and intervention, had low ICCs, regardless of period examined. Conclusions: This first attempt at validating the EIPS-FQ has demonstrated that the reliability of the EIPS-FQ is moderate/low, and therefore requires modification prior to use. The next iteration of the fidelity questionnaire will clarify or remove items which had very low fidelity and add evidence-based components not identified in the Delphi exercise.
Psychometric Properties of the Weight Loss Readiness Test in Active Duty Military Personnel Enrolled in a Weight Management Trial

Mara Tynan,Niloofar Afari,Scott Roesch,Matthew S Herbert

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usae221

2024-08-30

Abstract:Introduction: The Weight Loss Readiness Test (WLRT) was developed to encourage consideration of factors influencing readiness to engage in weight loss. The WLRT is used clinically, most notably to assess motivation before initiating Navy weight management programs, yet little is known about its psychometric properties. Materials and methods: This study examined the reliability, convergent and predictive validity, and factor structure of the WLRT in a sample of active duty service members enrolling in a Navy-based weight management program (N = 178, identified as female = 61%, mean age = 29.7 years, mean baseline body mass index = 33.1 kg/m2). All procedures were approved by the respective Institutional Review Boards and research committees. Results: Exploratory factor analysis revealed a 5-factor structure explaining 52% of the variance that best fit the data with low to moderate correlations between factors: (1) Motivation, (2) Exercise-Related Confidence, (3) Non-Exercise Confidence, (4) Cues, and (5) Anticipated Satisfaction. Internal reliability of subscales was acceptable to good (α = 0.755-0.903). Generally, convergent validity was found between the identified subscales and other measures of motivation, confidence, and disinhibited eating in expected directions. No relationships were found between the subscales and predictive validity outcomes (weight change, program attendance). Conclusions: Results indicate adequate structural and convergent validity in the WLRT, but that weight loss readiness, as measured by the WLRT, does not provide predictive validity regarding weight loss or attendance outcomes in this sample. Nonetheless, this measure offers clinical utility in fostering thoughtful conversations about weight loss. The WLRT uniquely focuses on long-term maintenance of behavior change and differentiates between exercise-related and non-exercise confidence. Future studies should further probe the utility of this measure in other populations and the contexts in which it is being used.
Content validity testing of the INTERMED Self‐Assessment in a sample of adults with rheumatoid arthritis and rheumatology healthcare providers

Kiran Dhiman,Marc Hall,Trafford Crump,Alison M. Hoens,Diane Lacaille,James A. Rankin,Karen L. Then,Glen Hazlewood,Cheryl Barnabe,Steven Katz,Jason Sutherland,Erika Dempsey,Claire E. H. Barber

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13978

2024-02-19

Health Expectations

Abstract:Background Care complexity can occur when patients experience health challenges simultaneously with social barriers including food and/or housing insecurity, lack of transportation or other factors that impact care and patient outcomes. People with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) may experience care complexity due to the chronicity of their condition and other biopsychosocial factors. There are few standardised instruments that measure care complexity and none that measure care complexity specifically in people with RA. Objectives We assessed the content validity of the INTERMEDS Self‐Assessment (IMSA) instrument that measures care complexity with a sample of adults with RA and rheumatology healthcare providers (HCPs). Cognitive debriefing interviews utilising a reparative framework were conducted. Methods Patient participants were recruited through two existing studies where participants agreed to be contacted about future studies. Study information was also shared through email blasts, posters and brochures at rheumatology clinic sites and trusted arthritis websites. Various rheumatology HCPs were recruited through email blasts, and divisional emails and announcements. Interviews were conducted with nine patients living with RA and five rheumatology HCPs. Results Three main reparative themes were identified: (1) Lack of item clarity and standardisation including problems with item phrasing, inconsistency of the items and/or answer sets and noninclusive language; (2) item barrelling, where items asked about more than one issue, but only allowed a single answer choice; and (3) timeframes presented in the item or answer choices were either too long or too short, and did not fit the lived experiences of patients. Items predicting future healthcare needs were difficult to answer due to the episodic and fluctuating nature of RA. Conclusions Despite international use of the IMSA to measure care complexity, patients with RA and rheumatology HCPs in our setting perceived that it did not have content validity for use in RA and that revision for use in this population under a reparative framework was unfeasible. Future instrument development requires an iterative cognitive debriefing and repair process with the population of interest in the early stages to ensure content validity and comprehension. Patient or Public Contribution Patient and public contributions included both patient partners on the study team and people with RA who participated in the study. Patient partners were involved in study design, analysis and interpretation of the findings and manuscript preparation. Data analysis was structured according to emergent themes of the data that were grounded in patient perspectives and experiences.

public, environmental & occupational health,health care sciences & services,health policy & services
The importance of content and face validity in instrument development: lessons learnt from service users when developing the Recovering Quality of Life measure (ReQoL)

Janice Connell,Jill Carlton,Andrew Grundy,Elizabeth Taylor Buck,Anju Devianee Keetharuth,Thomas Ricketts,Michael Barkham,Dan Robotham,Diana Rose,John Brazier

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1847-y

2018-04-19

Quality of Life Research

Abstract:PurposeService user involvement in instrument development is increasingly recognised as important, but is often not done and seldom reported. This has adverse implications for the content validity of a measure. The aim of this paper is to identify the types of items that service users felt were important to be included or excluded from a new Recovering Quality of Life measure for people with mental health difficulties.MethodsPotential items were presented to service users in face-to-face structured individual interviews and focus groups. The items were primarily taken or adapted from current measures and covered themes identified from earlier qualitative work as being important to quality of life. Content and thematic analysis was undertaken to identify the types of items which were either important or unacceptable to service users.ResultsWe identified five key themes of the types of items that service users found acceptable or unacceptable; the items should be relevant and meaningful, unambiguous, easy to answer particularly when distressed, do not cause further upset, and be non-judgemental. Importantly, this was from the perspective of the service user.ConclusionsThis research has underlined the importance of service users’ views on the acceptability and validity of items for use in developing a new measure. Whether or not service users favoured an item was associated with their ability or intention to respond accurately and honestly to the item which will impact on the validity and sensitivity of the measure.

public, environmental & occupational health,health care sciences & services,health policy & services
Changes in the ability to participate in and satisfaction with social roles and activities in patients in outpatient rehabilitation

Sietske J. Tamminga,Félicie M. van Vree,Gerard Volker,Leo D. Roorda,Caroline B. Terwee,Paulien H. Goossens,Thea P. M. Vliet Vlieland

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-020-00236-3

2020-09-01

Abstract:Abstract Background One of the main aims of rehabilitation is to improve participation. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) item banks ‘Ability to Participate in Social roles and Activities, (PROMIS-APS) and ‘Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities’ (PROMIS-SPS) are promising options to measure participation, but the literature on PROMIS measures of (satisfaction with) participation across diagnoses in rehabilitation is limited. Therefore, the objective of this study was to describe levels of and changes in participation, as assessed with the PROMIS-APS and the PROMIS-SPS short forms, of patients in outpatient rehabilitation. Methods This study had quantitative, observational design with assessments at admission and discharge. Consecutive patients treated between April and August 2018 receiving outpatient multidisciplinary rehabilitation were the population of this study. The following diagnosis categories were included: brain injury (e.g. stroke), spinal cord and nerve injury, neuromuscular disorder (e.g. lateral sclerosis), amputation, musculoskeletal condition (e.g. osteoarthritis) or heart or lung disease (e.g. myocardial infarction, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease). The main patient-reported outcomes (PRO) of this study were the short form of the PROMIS-APS (8 items, Dutch general population reference score 50.6 [SD 9.5]), and PROMIS-SPS (8 items, Dutch general population reference score 47.5 [SD 8.3]. Results Of the 1279 patients invited, 777 (61%) completed the online forms at admission. Of those, 329 patients were invited at discharge, with 209 (64%) completing the forms. The mean (SD) T-scores of the PROMIS-APS and PROMIS-SPS were lower at admission (42.7 [SD 7.4]; (41.4 [SD 7.7]) and discharge (43.6 [SD 7.2]; (43.7 [SD 7.8]) than the Dutch general population. The change scores of the PROMIS-APS and PROMIS-SPS were 1.2 (95% CI 0.4–1.9; p = 0.004; effect size 0.16), and 2.4 (95% CI 1.6–3.2; p 30 paired measurements statistically significant improvements of PROMIS-APS, PROMIS-SPS or both were seen. Conclusions Patients undergoing outpatient rehabilitation had, both at admission and discharge, considerably lower PROMIS-APS and PROMIS-SPS T-scores short forms than the general Dutch population, and showed small T-score improvements at discharge.
Optimizing Measurement Potential in Mental Health Clinical Practice: The Canadian Personal Recovery Outcome Measure (C-PROM) study

Skye P. Barbic,Nikki Ow,Sean A. Kidd,Catherine L. Backman,Steve Mathias,William G. Honer,Kwame McKenzie

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40737-024-00408-0

2024-05-30

Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation and Mental Health

Abstract:Abstract There is an increasing commitment to “Personal Recovery” as the desired outcome for mental health rehabilitation, yet there is little agreement about how to measure it. The purpose of this study was to develop a method of measuring recovery in community-dwelling people with mental health concerns. We describe a four-phase process, informed by guidelines for (patient-reported outcome measure) PROM development described by the Scientific Advisory Committee of the Medical Outcomes Trust, the Food and Drug Administration, and the International Society for Quality of Life Research, on how to quantify recovery in mental health care. The approach includes an iterative mixed methods process, guided by Classical Test Theory (CTT) and Rasch Measurement Theory (RMT), to develop the Canadian Personal Recovery Outcome Measure (C-PROM) for adults receiving mental health services. In Phases 1 and 2, 40 new items were generated by people with schizophrenia. In Phase 3, psychometric analysis and cognitive interviewing suggested that the item set be reduced to 30 items. Phase 4 (n = 575) showed good overall fit of the C-PROM items to the Rasch model (χ 2 = 163, df = 130, p = .05), no item misfit, high reliability ( r p = 0.92), an ordered response scale structure, high correlation between logit and scale scores (0.92) and no item bias for gender, age, or diagnosis. This study provided evidence for the C-PROM as a measure of personal recovery for people with mental health concerns. The measurement model underpinning this set of items has potential to support clinical relevance of scale scores, advancing an evidence-based approach to mental health rehabilitation practice and outcomes.

Oral therapies and food: to eat or not to eat?

Content Validition and Psychometric Evaluation of the Self-efficacy and Performance in Self-management Support Instrument for Physiotherapists

Psychometric properties of the living with long term conditions scale in an English-speaking population living with long term conditions in the UK

The Cardiac Rehabilitation Inventory: A New Method of Tailoring Patient Support

[Quality assurance in food production: a challenge for veterinary food hygiene?].

Psychometric Assessment of an Item Bank for Adaptive Testing on Patient-Reported Experience of Care Environment for Severe Mental Illness: Validation Study

Peritoneal macrophages of guinea pig possibly lack LTC4 synthetase.

Omental transposition for closure of median sternotomy following severe mediastinal and vascular infection.

Measurement properties of a modified Reintegration to Normal Living Index in a community-dwelling adult rehabilitation population

Development and measurement properties of the AxEL (attitude toward education and advice for low-back-pain) questionnaire

Doctors' attitudes to information systems: a survey of Derbyshire general practitioners.

The Work Experience Survey - Rheumatic conditions (United Kingdom): Psychometric properties and identifying the workplace barriers of employed people with inflammatory arthritis receiving vocational rehabilitation

How much testing can a kid take? Feasibility of collecting pediatric patient experience ratings of neuropsychological and psychological assessment

Chemical reactivity and intracavitary application of alkylating sugar alcohol derivatives.

DEVELOPMENT AND CROSS-VALIDATION OF A SHORT QUESTIONNAIRE TO EVALUATE SELF-REPORTED POSITIVE HEALTH; A CROSS SECTIONAL PANEL STUDY OF STRUCTURAL VALIDITY AMONG A GENERAL DUTCH POPULATION

Preliminary evaluation of a questionnaire for assessing fidelity of early intervention for psychosis services

Psychometric Properties of the Weight Loss Readiness Test in Active Duty Military Personnel Enrolled in a Weight Management Trial

Content validity testing of the INTERMED Self‐Assessment in a sample of adults with rheumatoid arthritis and rheumatology healthcare providers

The importance of content and face validity in instrument development: lessons learnt from service users when developing the Recovering Quality of Life measure (ReQoL)

Changes in the ability to participate in and satisfaction with social roles and activities in patients in outpatient rehabilitation

Optimizing Measurement Potential in Mental Health Clinical Practice: The Canadian Personal Recovery Outcome Measure (C-PROM) study