Four-Way Evolutionary Game Analysis of Government Project Bidding Collusion in a State of Limited Rationality Based on Prospect Theory

Chongsen Ma,Yun Chen,Sirui Nie

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6092802

IF: 3.12

2022-01-21

Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience

Abstract:Controlling collusion in government bidding is a prerequisite for ensuring social justice and the smooth operation of projects. Based on the prospect theory, this article establishes a four-party evolutionary game model for tenderers, enterprises with higher willingness to collude, enterprises with lower willingness to collude, and supervising enterprises. The study uses replication dynamics to analyze the stability of strategy selection after the evolutionary game. The results show that higher project base returns increase the probability of collusion, while lower market competition, higher risk aversion, and stronger collusive regulation all reduce the probability of collusion. When regulators adopt a strong regulatory strategy, the remaining project participants tend to choose a noncollusive strategy.

mathematical & computational biology,neurosciences

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper attempts to address the issue of how to control collusion behavior in the bidding process of government investment projects through a four-party evolutionary game analysis. Specifically, the paper establishes a four-party evolutionary game model among bidders, high-willingness collusion enterprises, low-willingness collusion enterprises, and regulatory enterprises based on prospect theory. The study aims to analyze the strategy choices and their stability of these participants under bounded rationality to reduce the occurrence of collusion behavior.

### Main Issues
1. **Control Collusion Behavior**: Ensure social justice and smooth project execution.
2. **Analyze Strategy Choices**: Analyze the stability of strategy choices of each party after the evolutionary game through the replicator dynamics method.
3. **Influencing Factors**: Study the impact of factors such as project base return, market competition degree, risk aversion degree, and collusion regulation intensity on the probability of collusion.

### Research Background
- **Importance of Bidding**: Bidding is an effective way to acquire and allocate resources and is widely used in socio-economic activities.
- **Situation in China**: Government investment projects in China are mainly determined through bidding. However, due to information asymmetry, profit-driven motives, and imperfect constraint mechanisms, illegal behaviors such as collusion often occur in the bidding process.
- **Existing Research**: Existing research mainly focuses on the analysis of vertical collusion phenomena, but most of them use game theory and principal-agent theory, with less consideration of participants' risk attitudes and behavioral decision tendencies.

### Innovations
1. **Four-Party Game Model**: Introduces four participants (bidders, high-willingness collusion enterprises, low-willingness collusion enterprises, and regulatory enterprises), making the model more consistent with actual situations.
2. **Diverse Parameter Model**: Considers not only the impact of direct penalties such as fines but also introduces indicators such as market competitiveness and social recognition loss, making the research results more relevant and reliable.

### Methodology
- **Evolutionary Game Theory**: Combines prospect theory to analyze the evolutionary behavior of each party in the bidding process.
- **MATLAB Simulation**: Uses simulation to analyze the impact of relevant factors on evolutionary outcomes.

### Results
- **Increase in Project Base Return**: Increases the probability of collusion.
- **Weakened Market Competition**, **Increased Risk Aversion**, **Strengthened Collusion Regulation**: Decreases the probability of collusion.
- **Strong Regulation Strategy**: When regulators adopt a strong regulation strategy, other project participants tend to choose non-collusion strategies.

### Conclusion
By establishing a four-party evolutionary game model and combining it with prospect theory, this study provides new perspectives and methods for controlling collusion in the bidding process of government investment projects. It helps participants make reasonable risk management decisions in a complex and changing risk environment.