Symmetry in Triple Hop Distance Hides Asymmetries in Knee Function After ACL Reconstruction in Athletes at Return to Sports
Argyro Kotsifaki,Sam Van Rossom,Rodney Whiteley,Vasileios Korakakis,Roald Bahr,Vasileios Sideris,Philip Graham Smith,Ilse Jonkers
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465211063192
IF: 4.8
2021-12-10
The American Journal of Sports Medicine
Abstract:Background: After anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), a battery of strength and hop tests is frequently used to determine the readiness of an athlete to successfully return to sports. However, the anterior cruciate ligament reinjury rate remains alarmingly high. Purpose: To evaluate the lower limb function of athletes after ACLR at the time when they had been cleared to return to sports (RTS). We aimed to evaluate if passing discharge criteria ensures restoration of normal lower limb biomechanics in terms of kinematics, kinetics, work, and percentage work contribution during a triple hop for distance. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Integrated 3-dimensional motion analysis was performed in 24 male athletes after ACLR when cleared to RTS and 23 healthy male controls during the triple-hop test. The criteria for RTS were (1) clearance by the surgeon and the physical therapist, (2) completion of a sports-specific on-field rehabilitation program, and (3) limb symmetry index >90% after quadriceps strength and hop battery tests. Lower limb and trunk kinematics, as well as knee joint moments and work, were calculated. Between-limb differences (within athletes after ACLR) and between-group differences (between ACLR and control groups) were evaluated using mixed linear models. Results: Although achieving 97% limb symmetry in distance hopped and displaying almost 80% symmetry for knee work absorption in the second rebound and third landing, the ACLR cohorts demonstrated only 51% and 66% limb symmetry for knee work generation in the first and second rebound phases, respectively. During both work generation phases of the triple hop, the relative contribution of the involved knee was significantly smaller, with a prominent compensation from the hip joint ( P < .001, for all phases) as compared with the uninvolved limb and the controls. In addition, patients deployed a whole body compensatory strategy to account for the between-limb differences in knee function, mainly at the hip, pelvis, and trunk. Conclusion: Symmetry in the triple hop for distance masked important deficits in the knee joint work. These differences were more prominent during work generation (concentric-propulsive) than work absorption (eccentric-landing). Clinical Relevance: Symmetry in hop distance during the triple hop test masked significant asymmetries in knee function after ACLR and might not be the appropriate outcome to use as a discharge criterion. Differences between limbs in athletes after ACLR were more prominent during the power generation than the absorption phase.
orthopedics,sport sciences