Abstract:The American Journal of Sports Medicine, Ahead of Print. Background:After posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (PCLR), functional deficits at the knee can persist. It remains unclear if neighboring joints compensate for the knee during demanding activities of daily living.Purpose:To assess long-term alterations in lower limb mechanics in patients after PCLR.Study Design:Descriptive laboratory study.Methods:A total of 28 patients who had undergone single-bundle unilateral isolated or combined PCLR performed stair navigation, squat, sit-to-stand, and stand-to-sit tasks at 8.2 ± 2.2 years after surgery. Motion capture and force plates were used to collect kinematic and kinetic data. Then, 3-dimensional hip, knee, and ankle kinematic data of the reconstructed limb were compared with those of the contralateral limb using statistical parametric mapping.Results:Side-to-side differences at the knee were primarily found during upward-driven movements at 8 years after surgery. The reconstructed knee exhibited lower internal rotation during the initial loading phase of stair ascent versus the contralateral knee (P = .005). During the sit-to-stand task, higher flexion angles during the midcycle (P = .017) and lower external rotation angles (P = .049) were found in the reconstructed knee; sagittal knee (P = .001) and hip (P = .016) moments were lower in the reconstructed limb than the contralateral limb. In downward-driven movements, side-to-side differences were minimal at the knee but prominent at the ankle and hip: during stair descent, the reconstructed ankle exhibited lower dorsiflexion and lower external rotation during the midcycle versus the contralateral ankle (P = .006 and P = .040, respectively). Frontal hip moments in the reconstructed limb were higher than those in the contralateral limb during the stand-to-sit task (P = .010); during squats, sagittal hip angles in the reconstructed limb were higher than those in the contralateral limb (P < .001).Conclusion:Patients after PCLR exhibited compensations at the hip and ankle during downward-driven movements, such as stair descent, squats, and stand-to-sit. Conversely, residual long-term side-to-side differences at the knee were detected during upward-driven movements such as stair ascent and sit-to-stand.Clinical Relevance:After PCLR, side-to-side differences in biomechanical function were activity-dependent and occurred either at the knee or neighboring joints. When referring to the contralateral limb to assess knee function in the reconstructed limb, concentric, upward-driven movements should be prioritized. Compensations at the hip and ankle during downward-driven movements lead to biases in long-term functional assessments.

Longitudinal assessment of knee joint proprioception using weight-bearing and non-weight-bearing tests throughout rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

LOWER LIMB PERFORMANCE AND KINETIC ASYMMETRIES IN PATIENTS FOLLOWING ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION

Lower limb coordination patterns following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A longitudinal study

Neuromuscular function in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed patients at long-term follow-up

Quadriceps tendon autograft ACL reconstructed subjects overshoot target knee extension angle during active proprioception testing

Proprioception following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Activity-Dependent Compensation at the Hip and Ankle at 8 Years After the Reconstruction of Isolated and Combined Posterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries

Outcomes of proprioceptive training on recovery after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Remnant preservation may improve proprioception after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Patellofemoral and tibiofemoral joint loading during a single‐leg forward hop following ACL reconstruction

Comparison of Proprioception Recovery Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using an Artificial Graft Versus an Autograft

Back to Normal Symmetry? Biomechanical Variables Remain More Asymmetrical Than Normal During Jump and Change-of-Direction Testing 9 Months After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Biomechanical Evaluation of Preoperative Rehabilitation in Patients of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury

Strategies for knee stabilising and pivot-shift avoidance in a step-down and cross-over task observed sub-acutely after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Abnormal balance control mechanisms during dynamic reaching forward and quiet standing in patients with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Postural Control During Single-Leg Landing in Female Athletes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Atypical Lower Limb Mechanics During Weight Acceptance of Stair Descent at Different Time Frames After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Factors Affecting Proprioceptive Recovery after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

In Vivo Gait Kinematics of the Knee after Anatomical and Non-Anatomical Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction-a Prospective Study

Evaluating Gait with Force Sensing Insoles 6 Months after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: An Autograft Comparison

No Association of Time From Surgery With Functional Deficits in Athletes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction