Abstract:Analyses of human reaction to economic incentives reveal contradictory deviations from maximization. For example, underinvestment in the stock market suggests risk aversion, but insufficient diversification of financial assets suggests risk-seeking. Leading explanations for these contradictions assume that different choice environments (e.g., different framings) trigger different biases. Our analysis shows that variation in the choice environment is not a necessary condition. It demonstrates how certain changes in the incentive structure are sufficient to trigger six pairs of contradictory deviations from maximization even when the choice environment is fixed. Moreover, our analysis shows that the direction of these deviations can be captured by assuming that choice propensities reflect reliance on small samples of past experiences. In order to clarify the underlying processes, we considered distinct models of the reliance on small samples assumption, and compared them to classical models of choice (including prospect theory). The comparison focused on both within-individual, and between-group predictions (based on a preregistered study with 120 new tasks). The results reveal large advantage of "wide sampling" models that (in the static settings we examine) approximate an effort to rely on the most similar past experiences. Surprisingly, we also found that assuming that the parameters reflect stable individual traits impairs predictions; it seems that the number of "most similar past experiences" for each individual varies from task to task. These results suggest that ignoring the predictable impact of the incentive structure can lead to exaggeration of the importance of environment- and individual-specific decision biases. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved)

Ergodicity-breaking reveals time optimal decision making in humans

The time interpretation of expected utility theory

Risk Preferences in Time Lotteries

Bounded optimality of time investments in rats, mice, and humans

Utility Maximization, Risk Aversion, and Stochastic Dominance

Entropy-driven decision-making dynamics sheds light on the emergence of the "paradox of choice"

Risk Aversion in Non-Ergodic Systems

Are decisions under risk malleable?

Distinguishing Risk Preferences using Repeated Gambles

Cognitive Energy Cost of Informed Decisions

Decisions in Motion: Decision Dynamics during Intertemporal Choice reflect Subjective Evaluation of Delayed Rewards

Time-Consistency of Optimal Investment under Smooth Ambiguity

Behavioral Biases and Nonadditive Dynamics in Risk Taking: An Experimental Investigation

Contradictory deviations from maximization: Environment-specific biases, or reflections of basic properties of human learning?

Human Decision Time in Uncertain Binary Choice

Risk Aversion, Indivisible Timing Options, and Gambling

Investment Decisions and Time Horizon: Risk Perception and Risk Behavior in Repeated Gambles

Optimal Decision-Making under Uncertainties

Approximate optimality and the risk/reward tradeoff given repeated gambles

Human perceptual decision making of nonequilibrium fluctuations

Optimal Stopping under Model Ambiguity: a Time-Consistent Equilibrium Approach