Listeria encephalitis with intermittent symptoms and serological diagnosis.

A. Zeman,J. Bamford,C. Warlow,R. Mitchell

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/JNNP.51.3.458

1988-03-01

Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry

Abstract:Approximately 7 months after the onset of his illness, he lapsed into coma and expired shortly thereafter. Necropsy was limited to brain examination by family request. The brain weighed 1555 grams. On external inspection, the pons was enlarged to 5 cm between the trigeminal nerve exits on either side, was firm to palpation, and grossly discoloured. The left cerebral peduncle was also enlarged. On cut sections, tumour infiltrates were found in the left medullary pyramid, left pons, caudal midbrain, both cerebral peduncles, and the left thalamus, extending into the left internal capsule and globus pallidus. Microscopic examination showed a hypercellular, poorly differentiated proliferation, consistent with glioblastoma multiform. All cerebral vessels were free ofatheroma. No ischaemic damage was found in brainstem structures. This 70 year old man presented with signs of brainstem dysfunction, including diplopia, ataxia, and dysphagia, and progressed to the point that a presumptive diagnosis of basal artery insufficiency, secondary to progressive basilar artery thrombosis, was entertained. At necropsy, a primary malignant glioma of the brainstem was found. It was surmised that the tumour compressed the basilar artery, resulting in the radiographic abnormalities described. We present this case to demonstrate how, in spite of radiographic and neurophysiologic abnormalities, the correct diagnosis may be elusive in cases of brainstem ischaemia. Kinkel, et al, reported several cases of cerebral ischaemic infarction, with local and distant enhancement on CT.6 Their description of the CT findings is similar to those in our case. Nonvisualisation of the basilar artery on both venous angiography and contrast CT would normally be convincing evidence of basilar artery insufficiency but, in our case, it was of false localising value. Tumour progression has to be considered always in the differential diagnosis of progressive brainstem syndromes.