Clinical practice. Sexual desire and arousal disorders in women.

R. Basson

IF: 158.5

New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Effectiveness of behaviour change techniques in physiotherapy interventions to promote physical activity adherence in lower limb osteoarthritis patients: A systematic review

Matthew Willett,Joan Duda,Sally Fenton,Charlotte Gautrey,Carolyn Greig,Alison Rushton

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219482

IF: 3.7

2019-07-10

PLoS ONE

Abstract:Lower limb osteoarthritis (OA) causes high levels of individual pain and disability and is an increasing socio-economic burden to global healthcare systems. Physical Activity interventions are commonly provided by physiotherapists to help patients with lower limb OA manage their clinical symptoms.To identify and evaluate the effectiveness of behavioural change techniques (BCTs) within physiotherapy interventions to increase physical activity (PA) adherence in patients with lower limb OA.A systematic review was conducted, following Cochrane guidelines according to a published and registered protocol (CRD42016039932). Two independent researchers conducted searches, determined eligibility, assessed risk of bias (Cochrane tool), intervention fidelity (NIHBCC checklist), and coded randomised controlled trials (RCTs) for BCTs (V1 taxonomy). BCT effectiveness ratios were calculated and RCT risk of bias and intervention fidelity were summarised narratively.A highly sensitive search strategy was conducted on Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, CENTRAL, CINAHL and PEDro and grey literature databases from inception to January 2nd, 2018. Reference lists of included RCTs and relevant articles were reviewed, and a citation search was conducted using Web of Science.RCTs that evaluated the effectiveness of a physiotherapy intervention that incorporated ≥1 BCT that promoted home or community-based PA adherence in patients with lower limb osteoarthritis.Twenty-four RCTs (n = 2366 participants) of variable risk of bias (RoB) (5 low; 7 moderate; 12 high) and poor intervention reporting from 10 countries were included. Heterogeneity of intervention BCTs and PA adherence outcome measures precluded meta-analysis. Thirty-one distinct BCTs were identified in 31 interventions across RCTs. In general, BCTs demonstrated higher effectiveness ratios for short-term and long-term PA adherence compared with medium-term outcomes. The BCTs 'behavioural contract', 'non-specific reward', 'patient-led goal setting' (behaviour), 'self-monitoring of behaviour', and 'social support (unspecified) demonstrated the highest effectiveness ratios across time points to promote PA adherence.BCTs demonstrate higher short and long-term than medium-term effectiveness ratios. Further research involving low RoB RCTs incorporating transparently reported interventions with pre-specified BCTs aimed at optimising lower limb OA patient PA adherence is required.

multidisciplinary sciences
Effective interventions to improve long-term physiotherapy exercise adherence among patients with lower limb osteoarthritis. A systematic review

Pathmanathan Cinthuja,Nidhya Krishnamoorthy,Gamalendira Shivapatham

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05050-0

IF: 2.562

2022-02-14

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Abstract:Abstract Introduction Osteoarthritis (OA) is a chronic condition. Physiotherapy is known to be beneficial for people with OA. Patient adherence to physiotherapy exercise is essential for the effective management of OA. Objectives To determine different methods used to enhance physiotherapy exercise adherence for a period of more than 12 months among patients with OA and to report the most effective methods to enhance exercise adherence among people with lower limb OA. Design Systematic review. Methods PubMed, Pedro, Web of Science, and EMBASE databases were searched for randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, case-control studies, and cross-sectional studies published in the English language from 2000 to 2020. The literature search was done on 27 August 2020. Two researchers independently conducted the screening, eligibility assessment, data extraction, methodology quality assessment using the PEDro scale, and risk of bias assessment using RoB2. A narrative synthesis of key outcomes is presented, percentage of adherence rate; Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review was used to report the review. Meta-analysis was not performed due to heterogeneity of studies. The study protocol was registered in Prospero (Prospero ID: CRD42020205653). Results The primary search strategy identified 5839 potentially relevant articles, of which 5157 remained after discarding duplicates. After screening based on title and abstract, 40 papers were potentially eligible for inclusion. Five of these papers met all predefined eligibility criteria. Introducing methods to enhance exercise adherence has caused a significant increase in exercise adherence for less than 6 or 12 months. There were no significant differences in adherence for more than 12 months with different methods. The results indicate that booster-sessions (89.69%) and telephone-linked communication (86%) had higher percentages for exercise adherence. Secondary outcomes such as pain, stiffness and function show positive outcomes with increasing exercise adherence. However, there were no significant differences on these secondary outcomes. Conclusion The booster sessions and telephone-linked communication appear to enhance exercise adherence for more than 12 months among patients with OA. However, the number of high-quality studies is inadequate to confirm our findings. Therefore, more studies with higher methodological quality are needed to determine the best strategies to enhance long-term exercise adherence among people with OA.

orthopedics,rheumatology
Effect of a mHealth exercise intervention compared with supervised exercise therapy in osteoarthritis management: protocol of the DigiOA trial

Lars Martinsen,Nina Østerås,Tuva Moseng,Anne Therese Tveter,Martinsen,L.,Osteras,N.,Moseng,T.,Tveter,A. T.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066248

IF: 3.006

2022-09-24

BMJ Open

Abstract:Introduction Soaring prevalence of hip and knee osteoarthritis (OA) inflicts high costs on the healthcare system. A further rise in the OA incidence is expected, generating increased demand of care potentially challenging accessibility and threatening to overwhelm the healthcare system. Innovative solutions that may improve accessibility to recommended OA care for patients in primary care and maintain healthcare sustainability are warranted. Digitalising home exercise therapy may be one such solution. The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a mobile health app providing digitalised home exercises, compared with supervised exercise therapy in patients with OA. Second, we will evaluate the cost-efficiency of the intervention and explore potential differences in outcome and adherence to exercises in the experimental treatment group. Methods and analysis A two-armed non-inferiority randomised controlled trial will be conducted. In total, 156 patients with hip and/or knee OA will be recruited from physiotherapy clinics in primary care in Norway. Following patient education, patients will be randomised to either 6 weeks of standard treatment (2 weekly sessions of supervised exercise therapy) or experimental treatment (home exercises via the Virtual Training (VT) app). Primary outcome is the proportion of Outcome Measures in Rheumatology-Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) responders at 6 weeks. Secondary outcomes include physical performance, patient-reported outcomes related to pain, fatigue, disease activity, physical function, mental health, health related quality of life, self-efficacy, utilisation of healthcare services and medication, digital competence and use of apps. Ethics and dissemination Patients will sign an informed consent form before participating in the trial. Approval has been granted by the Regional Ethics Committee (201105) and Data Protection Officer at Diakonhjemmet Hospital (00221). Patient research partners will contribute in all parts of the study. Trial registration number NCT04767854.

medicine, general & internal
Interventions to Improve Long-Term Adherence to Physical Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review

Colleen A Burke,Katie J Seidler,Zachary D Rethorn,Helen Hoenig,Kelli Allen,Amir Alishahi Tabriz,Katherine Norman,Laura K Murphy-McMillan,Jason Sharpe,Letha M Joseph,Jessica R Dietch,Andrzej S Kosinski,Sarah Cantrell,Jennifer M Gierisch,Belinda Ear,Adelaide Gordon,Karen M Goldstein,Colleen A. Burke,Katie J. Seidler,Zachary D. Rethorn,Laura K. Murphy-McMillan,Letha M. Joseph,Jessica R. Dietch,Andrzej S. Kosinski,Jennifer M. Gierisch,Karen M. Goldstein

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1519/jpt.0000000000000402

2024-01-12

Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy

Abstract:Objective: To evaluate the impact of physical rehabilitation interventions, supplemented with one or more adherence-enhancing components, on outcomes among adults with hip or knee osteoarthritis or chronic lower back pain. Design: Primary literature search from inception of each database to July 27, 2021, guided by relevant search terms and keywords to search titles and abstracts. All articles meeting eligibility criteria were included for data abstraction. Data Sources: MEDLINE, CINAHL Complete, and Embase. Eligibility Criteria for Selecting Studies: Randomized and nonrandomized trials evaluating adherence-focused intervention components conducted in addition to an index usual care or usual care–like physical rehabilitation program among adults with hip or knee osteoarthritis or chronic low back pain. Eligible studies included a comparator group of the same index physical rehabilitation intervention without the adjunctive adherence components. Included studies measured outcomes at least 3 months after the rehabilitation course. Results: Of the 10 studies meeting inclusion criteria, 6 interventions were delivered concurrent to an index rehabilitation program and 4 were delivered sequentially. Of the 3 studies that reported a positive effect on long-term adherence, only 1 was a low risk of bias study. There is very limited evidence of a beneficial treatment effect of adjunct adherence interventions on long-term physical function, self-efficacy, or adverse events. Conclusion: We found inadequate evidence evaluating adherence-enhancing interventions for the specific promotion of long-term adherence to home rehabilitation programs. Future studies should consider testing interventions specifically built to target behavioral maintenance of home rehabilitation programs.

rehabilitation,geriatrics & gerontology,gerontology
Sustained oscillations in an insect visual system

R. Loesel,U. Homberg

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001140050490

1998-05-01

Die Naturwissenschaften

Abstract:
Effectiveness of a telehealth-delivered clinician-supported exercise and weight loss program for hip osteoarthritis – protocol for the Better Hip randomised controlled trial

Kim L. Bennell,Catherine Keating,Belinda Lawford,Bridget Graham,Michelle Hall,Julie A. Simpson,Fiona McManus,Brinley Hosking,Priya Sumithran,Anthony Harris,Maame Esi Woode,Jill J. Francis,Jennifer Marlow,Sharon Poh,Rana S. Hinman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-07131-0

IF: 2.562

2024-02-15

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Abstract:Hip osteoarthritis (OA) is a leading cause of chronic pain and disability worldwide. Self-management is vital with education, exercise and weight loss core recommended treatments. However, evidence-practice gaps exist, and service models that increase patient accessibility to clinicians who can support lifestyle management are needed. The primary aim of this study is to determine the effectiveness of a telehealth-delivered clinician-supported exercise and weight loss program ( Better Hip ) on the primary outcomes of hip pain on walking and physical function at 6 months, compared with an information-only control for people with hip OA.

orthopedics,rheumatology
Relative efficacy of different types of exercise for treatment of knee and hip osteoarthritis: protocol for network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Siew-Li Goh,Monica S M Persson,Archan Bhattacharya,Michelle Hall,Michael Doherty,Weiya Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0321-6

2016-09-02

Abstract:Background: 'Exercise' is universally recommended as a core treatment for knee and hip osteoarthritis (OA). However, there are very few head-to-head comparative trials to determine the relative efficacy between different types of exercise. The aim of this study is to benchmark different types of exercises against each other through the use of a common comparator in a network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Methods: This study will include only RCTs published in peer-reviewed journals. A systematic search will be conducted in several electronic databases and other relevant online resources. No limitations are imposed on language or publication date. Participants must be explicitly identified by authors as having OA. Interventions that involved exercise or comparators in any form will be included. Pain is the primary outcome of interest; secondary outcomes will include function and quality of life measures. Quality assessment of studies will be based on the modified Cochrane's risk of bias assessment tool. At least two investigators will be involved throughout all stages of screening and data acquisition. Conflicts will be resolved through discussion. Conventional meta-analysis will be performed based on random effects model and network meta-analysis on a Bayesian model. Subgroup analysis will also be conducted based on study, patient and disease characteristics. Discussion: This study will provide for the first time comprehensive research evidence for the relative efficacy of different exercise regimens for treatment of OA. We will use network meta-analysis of existing RCT data to answer this question. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42016033865.
Prefabricated contoured foot orthoses to reduce pain and increase physical activity in people with hip osteoarthritis: A randomised feasibility trial

Matthew G King,Ryan Hon,Eliza Roughead,Joanne L Kemp,Tania Pizzari,Justin Wong,Hylton B Menz,Nicholas F Taylor,Anton Harms,Jodie A McClelland,Adam I Semciw

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.2118

Abstract:Background: Hip osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent and burdensome condition that leads to impaired quality of life and a substantial economic burden. Encouraging physical activity, particularly walking, is crucial for OA management, but many individuals with hip OA fail to meet recommended activity levels. Prefabricated contoured foot orthoses have shown promise in improving hip muscle efficiency during walking in laboratory settings, but their real-world feasibility and efficacy remain uncertain. Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of conducting a fully powered randomised controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate the effectiveness of prefabricated contoured foot orthoses, prescribed via telehealth, in people with hip OA. Methods: This feasibility trial randomised 27 participants with hip OA into two groups: prefabricated contoured foot orthoses or flat shoe inserts. Feasibility outcomes were assessed, including recruitment rate, adherence, logbook completion, and dropout rate. Patient-reported outcomes and accelerometer-measured physical activity were collected as secondary outcomes. Results: While the recruitment rate was low (0.88 people/week), adherence to the intervention (59%), logbook completion (93%), and dropout rates (7%) met or exceeded our predefined feasibility parameters. Participants found the intervention acceptable, and practicality was demonstrated with minor adverse events. Preliminary efficacy testing indicated that prefabricated contoured foot orthoses positively affected physical activity (adjusted mean difference = 2590 [260 to 4920] steps/day), with comparable outcomes for hip-related quality of life and pain. Conclusion: This trial supports proceeding to a fully powered RCT to assess the effect of teleheath prescribed prefabricated contoured foot orthoses on physical activity in people with hip OA. Study registration number: National Institutes of Health Trial Registry (NCT05138380).
Listeria encephalitis with intermittent symptoms and serological diagnosis.

A. Zeman,J. Bamford,C. Warlow,R. Mitchell

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/JNNP.51.3.458

1988-03-01

Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry

Abstract:Approximately 7 months after the onset of his illness, he lapsed into coma and expired shortly thereafter. Necropsy was limited to brain examination by family request. The brain weighed 1555 grams. On external inspection, the pons was enlarged to 5 cm between the trigeminal nerve exits on either side, was firm to palpation, and grossly discoloured. The left cerebral peduncle was also enlarged. On cut sections, tumour infiltrates were found in the left medullary pyramid, left pons, caudal midbrain, both cerebral peduncles, and the left thalamus, extending into the left internal capsule and globus pallidus. Microscopic examination showed a hypercellular, poorly differentiated proliferation, consistent with glioblastoma multiform. All cerebral vessels were free ofatheroma. No ischaemic damage was found in brainstem structures. This 70 year old man presented with signs of brainstem dysfunction, including diplopia, ataxia, and dysphagia, and progressed to the point that a presumptive diagnosis of basal artery insufficiency, secondary to progressive basilar artery thrombosis, was entertained. At necropsy, a primary malignant glioma of the brainstem was found. It was surmised that the tumour compressed the basilar artery, resulting in the radiographic abnormalities described. We present this case to demonstrate how, in spite of radiographic and neurophysiologic abnormalities, the correct diagnosis may be elusive in cases of brainstem ischaemia. Kinkel, et al, reported several cases of cerebral ischaemic infarction, with local and distant enhancement on CT.6 Their description of the CT findings is similar to those in our case. Nonvisualisation of the basilar artery on both venous angiography and contrast CT would normally be convincing evidence of basilar artery insufficiency but, in our case, it was of false localising value. Tumour progression has to be considered always in the differential diagnosis of progressive brainstem syndromes.
Clinical and cost-effectiveness of bracing in symptomatic knee osteoarthritis management: protocol for a multicentre, primary care, randomised, parallel-group, superiority trial

Melanie A Holden,Michael Callaghan,David Felson,Fraser Birrell,Elaine Nicholls,Sue Jowett,J Kigozi,John McBeth,Belinda Borrelli,Clare Jinks,Nadine E Foster,Krysia Dziedzic,Christian Mallen,Carol Ingram,Alan Sutton,Sarah Lawton,Nicola Halliday,Liz Hartshorne,Helen Williams,Rachel Browell,Hannah Hudson,Michelle Marshall,Gail Sowden,Dan Herron,Evans Asamane,George Peat

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048196

IF: 3.006

2021-03-01

BMJ Open

Abstract:Background Brace effectiveness for knee osteoarthritis (OA) remains unclear and international guidelines offer conflicting recommendations. Our trial will determine the clinical and cost-effectiveness of adding knee bracing (matched to patients’ clinical and radiographic presentation and with adherence support) to a package of advice, written information and exercise instruction delivered by physiotherapists. Methods and analysis A multicentre, pragmatic, two-parallel group, single-blind, superiority, randomised controlled trial with internal pilot and nested qualitative study. 434 eligible participants with symptomatic knee OA identified from general practice, physiotherapy referrals and self-referral will be randomised 1:1 to advice, written information and exercise instruction and knee brace versus advice, written information and exercise instruction alone. The primary analysis will be intention-to-treat comparing treatment arms on the primary outcome (Knee Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score (KOOS)-5) (composite knee score) at the primary endpoint (6 months) adjusted for prespecified covariates. Secondary analysis of KOOS subscales (pain, other symptoms, activities of daily living, function in sport and recreation, knee-related quality of life), self-reported pain, instability (buckling), treatment response, physical activity, social participation, self-efficacy and treatment acceptability will occur at 3, 6, and 12 months postrandomisation. Analysis of covariance and logistic regression will model continuous and dichotomous outcomes, respectively. Treatment effect estimates will be presented as mean differences or ORs with 95% CIs. Economic evaluation will estimate cost-effectiveness. Semistructured interviews to explore acceptability and experiences of trial interventions will be conducted with participants and physiotherapists delivering interventions. Ethics and dissemination North West Preston Research Ethics Committee, the Health Research Authority and Health and Care Research in Wales approved the study (REC Reference: 19/NW/0183; IRAS Reference: 247370). This protocol has been coproduced with stakeholders including patients and public. Findings will be disseminated to patients and a range of stakeholders. Trial registration number ISRCTN28555470 .

medicine, general & internal
Promoting physical activity in rheumatoid arthritis through a physiotherapist led behaviour change-based intervention (PIPPRA): a feasibility randomised trial

Louise Larkin,Seán McKenna,Tadhg Pyne,Paul Comerford,Anusha Moses,Ailish Folan,Stephen Gallagher,Liam Glynn,Alexander Fraser,Bente Appel Esbensen,Norelee Kennedy

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-024-05544-1

2024-03-31

Rheumatology International

Abstract:Physical activity (PA) is recommended as a key component in the management of people with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The objective of this study was to examine the feasibility of a physiotherapist led, behaviour change (BC) theory-informed, intervention to promote PA in people with RA who have low levels of current PA. A feasibility randomised trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03644160) of people with RA over 18 years recruited from outpatient rheumatology clinics and classified as insufficiently physically active using the Godin−Shephard Leisure Time Physical Activity Questionnaire. Participants were randomised to intervention group (4 BC physiotherapy sessions in 8 weeks) delivered in person/virtually or control group (PA information leaflet only). Feasibility targets (eligibility, recruitment, and refusal), protocol adherence and acceptability were measured. Health care professionals (HCPs) involved in the study and patients in the intervention and control arms were interviewed to determine acceptability. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse the data with SPSS (v27) with interviews analysed using content analysis using NVivo (v14). Three hundred and twenty participants were identified as potentially eligible, with n = 183 (57%) eligible to participate, of which n = 58 (32%) consented to participate. The recruitment rate was 6.4 per month. Due to the impact of COVID-19 on the study, recruitment took place over two separate phases in 2020 and 2021. Of the 25 participants completing the full study, 23 were female (mean age 60 years (SD 11.5)), with n = 11 allocated to intervention group and n = 14 to control. Intervention group participants completed 100% of sessions 1 & 2, 88% of session 3 and 81% of session 4. The study design and intervention were acceptable overall to participants, with enhancements suggested. The PIPPRA study to improve promote physical activity in people with RA who have low PA levels was feasible, acceptable and safe. Despite the impact of COVID-19 on the recruitment and retention of patients, the study provides preliminary evidence that this physiotherapist led BC intervention is feasible and a full definitive intervention should be undertaken. Health care professionals involved in the study delivery and the patient participants described a number of positive aspects to the study with some suggestions to enhance the design. These findings hence inform the design of a future efficacy-focused clinical trial.

rheumatology
Movement behaviour patterns in patients with hip and/or knee osteoarthritis in the physical therapy setting: a cross-sectional study

Anne Maria Sjoerdtje de Hoop,Corelien Jacoba Johanna Kloek,Martijn Frits Pisters,Cindy Veenhof

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03644-0

2020-10-06

Abstract:Background: Osteoarthritis is one of the most common chronic joint diseases, mostly affecting the knee or hip through pain, joint stiffness and decreased physical functioning in daily life. Regular physical activity (PA) can help preserve and improve physical functioning and reduce pain in patients with osteoarthritis. Interventions aiming to improve movement behaviour can be optimized by tailoring them to a patients' starting point; their current movement behaviour. Movement behaviour needs to be assessed in its full complexity, and therefore a multidimensional description is needed. Objectives: The aim of this study was to identify subgroups based on movement behaviour patterns in patients with hip and/or knee osteoarthritis who are eligible for a PA intervention. Second, differences between subgroups regarding Body Mass Index, sex, age, physical functioning, comorbidities, fatigue and pain were determined between subgroups. Methods: Baseline data of the clinical trial 'e-Exercise Osteoarthritis', collected in Dutch primary care physical therapy practices were analysed. Movement behaviour was assessed with ActiGraph GT3X and GT3X+ accelerometers. Groups with similar patterns were identified using a hierarchical cluster analysis, including six clustering variables indicating total time in and distribution of PA and sedentary behaviours. Differences in clinical characteristics between groups were assessed via Kruskall Wallis and Chi2 tests. Results: Accelerometer data, including all daily activities during 3 to 5 subsequent days, of 182 patients (average age 63 years) with hip and/or knee osteoarthritis were analysed. Four patterns were identified: inactive & sedentary, prolonged sedentary, light active and active. Physical functioning was less impaired in the group with the active pattern compared to the inactive & sedentary pattern. The group with the prolonged sedentary pattern experienced lower levels of pain and fatigue and higher levels of physical functioning compared to the light active and compared to the inactive & sedentary. Conclusions: Four subgroups with substantially different movement behaviour patterns and clinical characteristics can be identified in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip and/or knee. Knowledge about these subgroups can be used to personalize future movement behaviour interventions for this population. Trial registration: Dutch clinical trial registration number of e-Exercise Osteoarthritis: NTR4224 .
Global mapping survey research on physiotherapeutic interventions for osteoarthritis: a scoping review protocol

Nívea Renata Oliveira Monteiro,Gabriely Cristina Sousa dos Anjos,Ana Carolina Pereira Nunes Pinto,Areolino Pena Matos

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087778

IF: 3.006

2024-10-02

BMJ Open

Abstract:Introduction Physiotherapists provide non-pharmacological conservative treatment for osteoarthritis (OA) using a wide spectrum of interventions. Previous surveys have identified global physiotherapy OA management practices. However, no review to date summarises the scope and findings of these studies. This article describes a scoping review protocol to map the surveys investigating physiotherapeutic interventions offered to patients with OA to identify the treatment interventions currently used for OA, the physiotherapists' attributes and organisational practice factors potentially associated with the choice of these interventions and to detect knowledge-practice gaps in the provision of physiotherapeutic interventions in OA treatment, contributing to guiding future research on this topic. Methods and analysis This is a protocol for a scoping review that will be based on Arksey and O'Malley scoping review methodology and the methodological guidance for conducting scoping reviews published by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI). Relevant articles will be searched using the following databases: Medline (PubMed), Embase, Web of Science and Google Scholar. Surveys studies addressing physiotherapeutic interventions offered to patients with OA will be included. Study will be selected through title/abstract and full-text screening stages and data will be extracted using an instrument based on the model available in the JBI Manual. The findings will be summarised using descriptive statistics according to our research questions. This review will be reported in accordance with the Preferred Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Scoping Reviews. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval is not required for this scoping review. Review findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, scientific conference presentations and scientific meetings. Study registration

medicine, general & internal
Moderators of Effects of Internet-Delivered Exercise and Pain Coping Skills Training for People With Knee Osteoarthritis: Exploratory Analysis of the IMPACT Randomized Controlled Trial

Belinda J Lawford,Rana S Hinman,Jessica Kasza,Rachel Nelligan,Francis Keefe,Christine Rini,Kim L Bennell

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/10021

2018-05-09

Abstract:Background: Internet-delivered exercise, education, and pain coping skills training is effective for people with knee osteoarthritis, yet it is not clear whether this treatment is better suited to particular subgroups of patients. Objective: The aim was to explore demographic and clinical moderators of the effect of an internet-delivered intervention on changes in pain and physical function in people with knee osteoarthritis. Methods: Exploratory analysis of data from 148 people with knee osteoarthritis who participated in a randomized controlled trial comparing internet-delivered exercise, education, and pain coping skills training to internet-delivered education alone. Primary outcomes were changes in knee pain while walking (11-point Numerical Rating Scale) and physical function (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index function subscale) at 3 and 9 months. Separate regression models were fit with moderator variables (age, gender, expectations of outcomes, self-efficacy [pain], education, employment status, pain catastrophizing, body mass index) and study group as covariates, including an interaction between the two. Results: Participants in the intervention group who were currently employed had significantly greater reductions in pain at 3 months than similar participants in the control group (between-group difference: mean 2.38, 95% CI 1.52-3.23 Numerical Rating Scale units; interaction P=.02). Additionally, within the intervention group, pain at 3 months reduced by mean 0.53 (95% CI 0.28-0.78) Numerical Rating Scale units per unit increase in baseline self-efficacy for managing pain compared to mean 0.11 Numerical Rating Scale units (95% CI -0.13 to 0.35; interaction P=.02) for the control group. Conclusions: People who were employed and had higher self-efficacy at baseline were more likely to experience greater improvements in pain at 3 months after an internet-delivered exercise, education, and pain coping skills training program. There was no evidence of a difference in the effect across gender, educational level, expectation of treatment outcome, or across age, body mass index, or tendency to catastrophize pain. Findings support the effectiveness of internet-delivered care for a wide range of people with knee osteoarthritis, but future confirmatory research is needed. Trial registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12614000243617; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=365812&isReview=true (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6z466oTPs).
Longitudinal characteristic curve of liver disease.

Y. Kitazoe,Y. Kurihara,Y. Okuhara,S. Onishi,A. Tomita,Y. Yamamoto,Y. Nishioka,M. Sasaki,K. Yamamoto,Y. Nose

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4825(95)98884-G

IF: 7.7

Computers in Biology and Medicine

Abstract:
Process evaluation of a cluster randomised implementation trial examining strategies to increase early access to exercise for people with knee osteoarthritis: protocol

Orsatti,A.,Bowden,J. L.,Naylor,J. M.,Boland,R.,Pardey,M.,Descallar,J.,Mills,K.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090360

IF: 3.006

2024-10-08

BMJ Open

Abstract:Introduction First steps for knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a cluster randomised implementation trial examining the effect of an educational reminder message included in knee X-ray reports on the proportion of people subsequently referred to exercise professionals for their knee OA. Evaluating the processes supporting the completion of the study and the efficacy of the reminder message is essential to interpreting the outcomes of the study and aiding translation into practice. Methods and analysis We will conduct a concurrent process evaluation throughout the current study using a previously published framework for examining cluster randomised trials. This framework divides processes into those occurring at the cluster level and those at the target population level. For the current study, the cluster level is within radiology clinics. The target population is people with newly diagnosed radiologically evident, structural knee OA. A mixed methods design, incorporating survey data, administrative records, field notes and semi-structured interviews with representatives from radiology clinics and people with knee OA, will evaluate these processes. The focus of the evaluation will be recruitment and response processes of the radiology clinics and delivery and response processes for the people with knee OA. We will also describe the context and explore how the nudge theory of behavioural change influences the outcome of the study. Ethics and dissemination The study protocol, inclusive of the process evaluation, was approved by Macquarie University Human Research Ethics Committee (#520221190343842). Findings will be disseminated through national and international conferences, national industry stakeholders and patient advocacy groups to reach all levels of healthcare. Staff at radiology clinics and people with knee OA involved in interviews provide written, informed consent to participate in the process evaluation. Specific findings will be incorporated into training modules aimed at radiology clinics and will be developed by our industry partners. Trial registration Prospectively registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12622001414707p). Registration occurred in December 2022

medicine, general & internal
Effect of Behavior-change Interventions on Daily Physical Activity in Patients with Intermittent Claudication: The OPTIMA Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis

Ukachukwu O Abaraogu,Philippa Dall,Chris Seenan,Sarah Rhodes,Trish Gorely,Joanna McParland,Julie Brittenden,Ebuka M Anieto,Lorna Booth,Cathy Gormal,Jeremy Dearling,Candida Fenton,Sarah Audsley,Kimberley Fairer,Lindsay Bearne,Dawn A Skelton

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjpc/zwae296

2024-09-12

Abstract:Aims: The study aimed to synthesize evidence of daily physical activity (PA) following Behavior-change technique (BCT)-based interventions compared to any control in individuals with peripheral arterial disease/intermittent claudication (PAD/IC); and examine the relationship between BCTs and daily PA. Methods: Systematic search of 11 databases from inception to 30/11/2022 was conducted, plus weekly email alerts of new literature until 31/8/2023. Studies comparing BCT-based interventions with any control were included. Primary analysis involved a pairwise random-effects meta-analysis. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane-RoB-2 and ROBINS-I tools. Certainty of evidence was evaluated with the GRADE system. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guideline was followed. Outcome measures were short-term (<6 months) change in daily PA, and maintenance of the daily PA (6 months or longer) reported as standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs). Results: Forty-one studies (4,339 patients; 26 RCTs/3,357 patients; 15 non-RCTs/982 patients; study mean age 60.3 to 73.8, 29.5% female) were included. Eleven RCTs (15 comparisons, 952 participants) suggested that BCT-based interventions increased daily PA in the short term compared to non-SET [increase of 0.20 SMD (95%CI: 0.07 to 0.33), ∼473 steps/day] with high certainty. Evidence of maintenance of daily PA (≥6 months) is unclear [increase of 0.12 SMD (95%CI: -0.04 to 0.29); ∼288 steps/day; 6RCTs, 8 comparisons, 899 participants], with moderate certainty. For daily PA, compared to SET it was inconclusive both for < 6months change [-0.13 SMD, 95%CI: -0.43 to 0.16); 3RCTs, 269 participants; low certainty] and ≥6months [-0.04 SMD, 95%CI: -0.55 to 0.47); 1 RCT, 89 participants; very low certainty]. It was unclear whether the number of BCTs or any BCT domain were independently related to an increase in PA. Conclusion: BCT-based interventions improve short-term daily PA in people with PAD/IC compared to non-SET controls. Evidence for maintenance of the improved PA at 6 months or longer and comparison with SET is uncertain. BCT-based interventions are effective choices for enhancing daily PA in PAD/IC.
Efficacy of home-based exercise in the treatment of pain and disability at the hip and knee in patients with osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Yichen Mao,Boyuan Qiu,Weiwei Wang,Pengwei Zhou,Zhixue Ou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-024-07585-w

2024-06-26

Abstract:Background: An increasing body of evidence suggests that home-based exercise (HBE) therapy has significant therapeutic effects on knee osteoarthritis (KOA) and hip osteoarthritis (HipOA), and it has advantages such as cost savings, strong operability, and good compliance compared with hospitalization and exercise courses. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of HBE in the treatment of KOA and HipOA. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Embase to collect randomized controlled trials. The retrieval time was from database establishment until March 6, 2024. Stata 15.1 software was used for data analysis. Results: A total of 16 randomized controlled trials involving 3,015participants were included, with 1,519 participants in the intervention group and 1,496 in the control group. The meta-analysis showed that, compared to the control group, HBE can significantly improve pain [SMD=-0.38, 95% CI (-0.58, -0.18); P = 0.001], joint function [SMD=-0.60, 95% CI (-1.01, -0.19); P = 0.004], balance ability [SMD=-0.67, 95% CI (-1.00, -0.34); P = 0.001], mobility (ADL) [SMD = 0.51, 95% CI (0.19, 0.82); P = 0.002] in patients with KOA and HipOA. There is no statistical difference in the improvement of joint stiffness [WMD = -0.80, 95% CI (-1.61, 0.01); P = 0.052]. In addition, subgroup analysis showed that HBE significantly improved pain, joint function, and balance ability in KOA patients compared with the control group. HipOA patients showed significant improvement in pain and joint function; However, HBE only improved activity ability in patients with comorbidities of KOA and HipOA. Conclusion: HBE can effectively alleviate pain, improve joint function, and enhance physical function in patients with KOA and HipOA. However, more high-quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with large sample sizes and long-term interventions are needed to validate the efficacy of HBE due to limitations in the methodology and consistency of indicator outcomes in the included RCTs. Registration number: We've registered with PROSPERO, and the number is CRD42023443085.
The Efficacy of Electronic Health–Supported Home Exercise Interventions for Patients With Osteoarthritis of the Knee: Systematic Review

Axel Georg Meender Schäfer,Christoff Zalpour,Harry von Piekartz,Toby Maxwell Hall,Volker Paelke

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.9465

IF: 7.076

2018-04-26

Journal of Medical Internet Research

Abstract:BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis of the knee is the most common cause for disability and limited mobility in the elderly, with considerable individual suffering and high direct and indirect disease-related costs. Nonsurgical interventions such as exercise, enhanced physical activity, and self-management have shown beneficial effects for pain reduction, physical function, and quality of life (QoL), but access to these treatments may be limited. Therefore, home therapy is strongly recommended. However, adherence to these programs is low. Patients report lack of motivation, feedback, and personal interaction as the main barriers to home therapy adherence. To overcome these barriers, electronic health (eHealth) is seen as a promising opportunity. Although beneficial effects have been shown in the literature for other chronic diseases such as chronic pain, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes, a systematic literature review on the efficacy of eHealth interventions for patients with osteoarthritis of knee is missing so far.OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of eHealth-supported home exercise interventions with no or other interventions regarding pain, physical function, and health-related QoL in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee.METHODS: MEDLINE, CENTRAL, CINAHL, and PEDro were systematically searched using the keywords osteoarthritis knee, eHealth, and exercise. An inverse variance random-effects meta-analysis was carried out pooling standardized mean differences (SMDs) of individual studies. The Cochrane tool was used to assess risk of bias in individual studies, and the quality of evidence across studies was evaluated following the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach.RESULTS: The literature search yielded a total of 648 results. After screening of titles, abstracts, and full-texts, seven randomized controlled trials were included. Pooling the data of individual studies demonstrated beneficial short-term (pain SMD=−0.31, 95% CI −0.58 to −0.04, low quality; QoL SMD=0.24, 95% CI 0.05-0.43, moderate quality) and long-term effects (pain −0.30, 95% CI −0.07 to −0.53, moderate quality; physical function 0.41, 95% CI 0.17-0.64, high quality; and QoL SMD=0.27, 95% CI 0.06-0.47, high quality).CONCLUSIONS: eHealth-supported exercise interventions resulted in less pain, improved physical function, and health-related QoL compared with no or other interventions; however, these improvements were small (SMD<0.5) and may not make a meaningful difference for individual patients. Low adherence is seen as one limiting factor of eHealth interventions. Future research should focus on participatory development of eHealth technology integrating evidence-based principles of exercise science and ways of increasing patient motivation and adherence.

health care sciences & services,medical informatics
Patients’ perceptions of physical activity before and after joint replacement: a systematic review with meta-ethnographic analysis

Toby O Smith,Sarah Latham,Vivienne Maskrey,Annie Blyth

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/postgradmedj-2015-133507

2015-08-25

Postgraduate Medical Journal

Abstract:BACKGROUND: It has been perceived that people following total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have the capability, with reduced pain, to increase their levels of physical activity.OBJECTIVES: To determine the attitudes and perceptions of people awaiting or having undergone THA or TKA to physical activity post-arthroplasty and to identify potential facilitators or barriers to engage in active living and physical activity pursuits.METHODS: Systematic review of published and unpublished databases was undertaken from their inception to November 2014. Studies exploring the attitudes and perceptions of people awaiting or having undergone THA or TKA to physical activity post-arthroplasty were included. Data were analysed through a meta-ethnography approach.RESULTS: From 528 citations, 13 papers were eligible, sampling 282 people post-THA or TKA. The literature was judged moderate to high quality. Following THA and TKA, people either wished to return to their pre-pathology level of physical activity or simply be able to engage in less physically demanding activities that are meaningful to them and their lifestyles. Barriers to engaging in higher levels of physical activity were largely related to limited information, which culminated in fear surrounding 'doing the right thing' both for individual's recovery and the longevity of the joint replacement.CONCLUSIONS: While many people post-THA or TKA wish to return to pre-pathological physical activity status, there is limited interest in actually undertaking greater levels of physical activity post-arthroplasty either for pleasure or health gains. Improvement in education and awareness of this may be key drivers to improve habitualisation of physical activity post-arthroplasty.TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42014014995.

medicine, general & internal

Clinical practice. Sexual desire and arousal disorders in women.

Effectiveness of behaviour change techniques in physiotherapy interventions to promote physical activity adherence in lower limb osteoarthritis patients: A systematic review

Effective interventions to improve long-term physiotherapy exercise adherence among patients with lower limb osteoarthritis. A systematic review

Effect of a mHealth exercise intervention compared with supervised exercise therapy in osteoarthritis management: protocol of the DigiOA trial

Interventions to Improve Long-Term Adherence to Physical Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review

Sustained oscillations in an insect visual system

Effectiveness of a telehealth-delivered clinician-supported exercise and weight loss program for hip osteoarthritis – protocol for the Better Hip randomised controlled trial

Relative efficacy of different types of exercise for treatment of knee and hip osteoarthritis: protocol for network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Prefabricated contoured foot orthoses to reduce pain and increase physical activity in people with hip osteoarthritis: A randomised feasibility trial

Listeria encephalitis with intermittent symptoms and serological diagnosis.

Clinical and cost-effectiveness of bracing in symptomatic knee osteoarthritis management: protocol for a multicentre, primary care, randomised, parallel-group, superiority trial

Promoting physical activity in rheumatoid arthritis through a physiotherapist led behaviour change-based intervention (PIPPRA): a feasibility randomised trial

Movement behaviour patterns in patients with hip and/or knee osteoarthritis in the physical therapy setting: a cross-sectional study

Global mapping survey research on physiotherapeutic interventions for osteoarthritis: a scoping review protocol

Moderators of Effects of Internet-Delivered Exercise and Pain Coping Skills Training for People With Knee Osteoarthritis: Exploratory Analysis of the IMPACT Randomized Controlled Trial

Longitudinal characteristic curve of liver disease.

Process evaluation of a cluster randomised implementation trial examining strategies to increase early access to exercise for people with knee osteoarthritis: protocol

Effect of Behavior-change Interventions on Daily Physical Activity in Patients with Intermittent Claudication: The OPTIMA Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis

Efficacy of home-based exercise in the treatment of pain and disability at the hip and knee in patients with osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The Efficacy of Electronic Health–Supported Home Exercise Interventions for Patients With Osteoarthritis of the Knee: Systematic Review

Patients’ perceptions of physical activity before and after joint replacement: a systematic review with meta-ethnographic analysis