Abstract:Background: Surgical site infection (SSI) occurs in 5% to 7% of patients undergoing operative fixation of acetabular fractures, with reported risk factors including longer operative duration, increased blood loss, pelvic artery embolization, and concurrent abdominal organ injury, among others. Psoas muscle density is a measure of muscle quality and, as a metric for sarcopenia and/or nutrition status, has been associated with poor outcomes such as mortality across multiple surgical specialties. To date, psoas muscle density has not been explored for its associations with SSI in acetabular fracture patients.Questions/purposes (1) Is decreased psoas muscle density, as measured by Hounsfield units, associated with an increased SSI risk after acetabular fracture fixation? (2) What patient, operative, and hospital variables are associated with an increased SSI risk after acetabular fracture fixation? Methods: Between 2012 to 2017, surgeons performed 684 acetabular ORIF procedures at one level I trauma center. Of those, 8% (56 of 684) did not meet inclusion criteria, leaving 92% (n = 628) for analysis in this study. The median (range) follow-up duration was 12 months (0.5-77). Patient demographics, comorbidities, operative and in-hospital variables, and psoas muscle density measured using preoperative pelvic CT images-acquired for all operative acetabular fracture patients-were analyzed. SSI was defined by positive culture results obtained during irrigation and débridement. Overall, 7% (42 of 628) of patients had an SSI. A multivariable regression analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors. Sensitivity analysis was performed with minimum follow-up set at 3 months and 6 months. Results: There was no difference in the mean psoas muscle density between patients with SSI (50.9 ± 10.2 Hounsfield units [HUs]) and those who did not have an SSI within 1 year of open reduction and internal fixation (51.4 ± 8.1 HUs) (mean difference: 0.5 [95% confidence interval -2.34 to 3.32]; p = 0.69). Four variables were independently associated with an increased risk of SSI: increased operative time (1.04 [95% CI 1.00 to 1.07]; p = 0.03), estimated blood loss (1.08 [95% CI 1.02 to 1.14]; p = 0.01), female sex (2.34 [95% CI 1.19 to 4.60]; p = 0.01), and intravenous drug use (3.95 [95% CI 1.51 to 10.33]; p = 0.01). Sensitivity analysis showed no change in results using either 3-month or 6-month minimum follow-up. Conclusions: Risk factors for SSI after acetabular fixation include female sex, intravenous drug use, prolonged operative times, and increased intraoperative blood loss. Although the density of the psoas muscle may be a surrogate for nutritional markers, it was not associated with SSI in our patients with acetabular fractures. Thus, it is not useful for risk assessment of SSI in the general population with acetabular fracture; however, future studies with larger sample sizes of patients older than 60 years may re-investigate this marker for SSI risk. Contrary to the results of previous studies, pelvic artery embolization, intraoperative blood transfusion, and intensive care unit stay did not increase the risk of SSI; however, we may have been underpowered to detect differences in these secondary endpoints. Future large, multisite studies may be needed to address these conflicting results more definitively. Level of evidence: Level III, therapeutic study.

Editorial Commentary: Psoas Tenotomy in the Setting of a Borderline Dysplastic Hip Risks Iatrogenic Instability: Be Extremely Cautious and Particularly in Athletes

Editorial Commentary: Indiscriminate Iliopsoas Tenotomy May Cause Complications-With Tight Indications and Transbursal Lengthening, We May Avoid Them

Editorial Commentary: Arthroscopy with Labral Preservation or Reconstruction Plus Capsular Closure Shows Excellent Outcome in Patients with Borderline Hip Dysplasia and is Less Invasive Than Periacetabular Osteotomy

The Iliopsoas: Anatomy, Clinical Evaluation, and Its Role in Hip Pain in the Athlete: A Scoping Review

Understanding recurrent groin pain following periacetabular osteotomy: assessment of psoas tendon mechanics using discrete element analysis

Clinical outcomes after arthroscopic psoas lengthening: the effect of femoral version

Arthroscopic techniques for treating ilio-psoas tendinopathy after hip arthroplasty

Editorial Commentary: Endoscopic Hip Abductor Repair Results in Excellent Outcomes in Challenging Patients: Surgical Indications Require Additional Clarification

The role of iliopsoas fractional lengthening in hip arthroscopy: a systematic review

Outcomes and Return-to-Sports Rates in Patients With Borderline Hip Dysplasia After Periacetabular Osteotomy: A Case Series With 5-Year Follow-up

Outcomes of Flexibility Sport Athletes With Borderline Hip Dysplasia After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: A Propensity-Matched Analysis at Minimum 2-Year Follow-up

Primary Hip Arthroscopy in Patients With Acetabular Dysplasia: A Systematic Review of Published Clinical Outcomes at Minimum 5-Year Follow-up

Determination of preoperative risk factors for iliopsoas tendonitis after total hip arthroplasty: A simulation study

Hip Flexor Muscle Activation During Common Rehabilitation and Strength Exercises

The effect of hip position on the length of trochanteric muscles: potential implications for early postoperative management of hip arthroplasty

Borderline Hip Dysplasia - Best Treated with Hip Arthroscopy or Periacetabular Osteotomy?

Satisfactory mid‐term clinical outcomes of endoscopic tenotomy for iliopsoas tendinopathy following total hip arthroplasty

Editorial Commentary: When Managing Patellofemoral Instability, Mind Your Ps and Qs: Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Versus Medial Quadriceps Tendon Femoral Ligament (MQTFL) Versus Medial Patellofemoral Complex

Risk Factors for Surgical Site Infection after Operative Fixation of Acetabular Fractures: Is Psoas Density a Useful Metric?

Mid- and Long-Term Outcomes Are Favorable for Patients With Borderline Dysplasia Undergoing Primary Hip Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review

Editorial Commentary: Endoscopic and Open Techniques Can Achieve Successful Outcomes With Hip Abductor Tendon Repair but Retracted Tears With High-Grade Fatty Atrophy May Benefit From an Open Approach