Abstract:We present a study of the dimensionality and factorial invariance of religiosity for 26 countries with a Christian heritage, based on the 1998 and 2008 rounds of the International Social Survey Programme (ISSP) Religion survey, using both exploratory and multi-group confirmatory factor analyses. The results of the exploratory factor analysis showed that three factors, common to Christian and religiously unaffiliated respondents, could be extracted from our initially selected items and suggested the testing of four different three-factor models using multi-group confirmatory factor analysis. For the model with the best fit and measurement invariance properties, we labeled the three resulting factors as "Beliefs in afterlife and miracles", "Belief and importance of God" and "Religious involvement." The first factor is measured by four items related to the Supernatural Beliefs Scale (SBS-6); the second by three items related to belief in God and God's perceived roles as a supernatural agent; and the third one by three items with the same structure found in previous cross-cultural analyses of religiosity using the European Values Survey (ESS) and also by belief in God. Unexpectedly, we found that one item, belief in God, cross-loaded on to the second and third factors. We discussed possible interpretations for this finding, together with the potential limitations of the ISSP Religion questionnaire for revealing the structure of religiosity. Our tests of measurement invariance across gender, age, educational degree and religious (un)affiliation led to acceptance of the hypotheses of metric- and scalar-invariance for these groupings (units of analysis). However, in the measurement invariance tests across the countries, the criteria for metric invariance were met for twenty-three countries only, and partial scalar invariance was accepted for fourteen countries only. The present work shows that the exploration of large multinational and cross-cultural datasets for studying the dimensionality and invariance of social constructs (in our case, religiosity) yields useful results for cross-cultural comparisons, but is also limited by the structure of these datasets and the way specific items are coded.

Extracellular HIV Tat and Tat cysteine rich peptide increase CCR5 expression in monocytes.

The Negative Association Between Religiousness and Children's Altruism Across the World.

Dimensionality and factorial invariance of religiosity among Christians and the religiously unaffiliated: A cross-cultural analysis based on the International Social Survey Programme

"Blessed are the Nations with High Levels of Schizophrenia": National Level Schizophrenia Prevalence and Its Relationship with National Levels of Religiosity

Religiousness and the HEXACO personality factors and facets in a large online sample

Do conservatives really have an advantage in mental health? An examination of measurement invariance

Can a negative religious causal attribution of mental illness affect the phenomenon of public stigma?

Analytic atheism: A cross-culturally weak and fickle phenomenon?

Risk aversion and religious behaviour: Analysis using a sample of Danish twins

Paranormal beliefs and individual differences: story seeking without reasoned review

Isolated But Not Necessarily Lonely

Bright Minds and Dark Attitudes

Is religion beneficial for mental health? A 9-year longitudinal study

Dare to know! The existential costs of a faith in science

[Visual acuity testing of three-year-old children using Landolt ring and picture targets].

More religion means less science. An International comparison of the relations between religious beliefs and levels of and attitudes to scientific knowledge

A Data-Driven Analysis of the Cognitive and Perceptual Attributes of Ideological Attitudes

Are you intelligent or rational? On the independence of intelligence quotient from rationality quotient

Intellectual Humility and Belief Extremity: Evidence for Curvilinearity?

Fundamentalism as dogmatic belief, moral rigorism, and strong groupness across cultures: Dimensionality, underlying components, and related interreligious prejudice.

DNA and IQ: Big deal or much ado about nothing? – A meta-analysis