Abstract:Recent years have not only seen growing public distrust in science, but also in the people conducting science. Yet, attitudes toward scientists remain largely unexplored, and the limited body of literature that exists points to an interesting ambivalence. While survey data suggest scientists to be positively evaluated (e.g., respected and trusted), research has found scientists to be perceived as capable of immoral behavior. We report two experiments aimed at identifying what contributes to this ambivalence through systematic investigations of stereotypical perceptions of scientists. In these studies, we particularly focus on two potential sources of inconsistencies in previous work: divergent operationalizations of morality (measurement effects), and different specifications of the broad group of scientists (framing effects). Results show that scientists are generally perceived as more likely to violate binding as opposed to individualizing moral foundations, and that they deviate from control groups more strongly on the latter. The extent to which different morality measures reflect the differentiation between binding and individualizing moral foundations at least partially accounts for previous contradictory findings. Moreover, the results indicate large variation in perceptions of different types of scientists: people hold more positive attitudes toward university-affiliated scientists as compared to industry-affiliated scientists, with perceptions of the 'typical scientist' more closely resembling the latter. Taken together, the findings have important academic ramifications for science skepticism, morality, and stereotyping research as well as valuable practical implications for successful science communication.

Dare to know! The existential costs of a faith in science

Prone to wellness? Dispositional awe, religion/spirituality, and well-being among academic scientists

The (im-)moral scientist? Measurement and framing effects shape the association between scientists and immorality

The influence of religious faith on prosocial intentions and behaviors. Findings from a cross-sectional survey among young adults voluntarily working in social contexts

More religion means less science. An International comparison of the relations between religious beliefs and levels of and attitudes to scientific knowledge

Being Spiritual but Not Religious (SBNR): Testing the Tripartite Meaning in Life Model With Beliefs in Free Will and Determinism as Meaning Frameworks

Primal World Belief Research, For Skeptics

Existential crisis and the awareness of dying: the role of meaning and spirituality

Contribution of Social Bonds to the Development of Scientific Research Identity in Adolescent Participants of a Science Enrichment Program

Earning respect and trust

A Sense of Continuity in Mortality? Exploring Science-Oriented Finns' Views on Afterdeath

Religious devoutness in college students: Relations with emotional adjustment and psychological separation from parents.

To be, or not to be more scientific? That is the question: yes, absolutely, but..

Subjective correlates and consequences of belief in free will

Science motivation, academic achievement, career aspirations in early adolescents

Testing the cultural-invariance hypothesis: A global analysis of the relationship between scientific knowledge and attitudes to science

Democratising Risk: In Search of a Methodology to Study Existential Risk

Does devoutness delay death? Psychological investment in religion and its association with longevity in the Terman sample.

Experimental Tests of Spirituality

The effect of seeing scientists as intellectually humble on trust in scientists and their research

The costs of curiosity and creativity: Minimizing the downsides while maximizing the upsides