Progesterone release profile and follicular development in Holstein cows receiving intravaginal progesterone devices

Lucas Oliveira E Silva,Alessio Valenza,Rodrigo Lemos Olivieri Rodrigues Alves,Mateus Anastacio da Silva,Taynara Jaqueline Barreiro da Silva,Jéssica Cristina Lemos Motta,Jéssica Nora Drum,Guilherme Madureira,Alexandre Hênryli de Souza,Roberto Sartori
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2021.07.001
IF: 2.923
2021-09-15
Theriogenology
Abstract:The aim of this study was to evaluate the progesterone (P4) release profile provided by eight commercial intravaginal P4 devices, as well as the effect of circulating P4 concentrations produced exclusively by these devices on the development of the dominant follicle (DF) in non-lactating multiparous Holstein cows. All cows were submitted to the same experimental design starting with the insertion of a reused P4 device (2 g - original P4 load) for 7 d, followed by two treatments of cloprostenol sodium (PGF; 0.482 mg), 24 h apart, 6 and 7 d after device insertion. Just before device removal, a Norgestomet ear implant was inserted and, 2 d later (Day 0), simultaneously to Norgestomet withdrawal, cows received one of the tested intravaginal devices and 2 mg of estradiol benzoate (EB) im. In Exp.1 (n = 22; three replicates), cows were randomized to receive: CIDR (1.38 g); PRID-Delta (1.55 g); Prociclar (0.75 g); or Repro sync (2 g). In Exp. 2 (n = 29; four replicates), cows were randomized to receive: Cue-Mate (1.56 g); DIB 0.5 (0.5 g); DIB (1 g); PRID-Delta (1.55 g); or Sincrogest (1 g). Blood samples were collected before P4 device insertion (Day 0), 12 h later and daily over 15 d (1 d after P4 device removal). Ultrasound examinations were performed to evaluate growth of the DF on Days 0, 7, 8, 9, and 10. Results are presented as mean ± SEM and differences were considered when P ≤ 0.05. Overall, the circulating P4 profile and mean circulating P4 over 10 d differed among treatments. However, no effects were observed on the DF diameter and follicular growth rate from Day 7-10 after P4 device insertion. In Exp. 2, devices that provided higher circulating P4 concentrations were associated to a slower DF growth during the treatment period. Finally, this study provided a better understanding of the P4 release profile produced by intravaginal P4 devices as well as their effect on circulating P4 concentrations and DF development in non-lactating Holstein cows.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?