The new eubacterium Roseomonas baikalica sp. nov. isolated from core samples collected by deep-hole drilling of the bottom of Lake Baikal

I. Andreeva,N. I. Pechurkina,O. Morozova,Elena I. Ryabchikova,S. Belikov,L. Puchkova,E. K. Emel'yanova,T. Torok,V. Repin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0026261707040157

2007-07-01

Microbiology

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

FAIR Header Reference genome: a TRUSTworthy standard

Adam Wright,Mark D Wilkinson,Christopher Mungall,Scott Cain,Stephen Richards,Paul Sternberg,Ellen Provin,Jonathan L Jacobs,Scott Geib,Daniela Raciti,Karen Yook,Lincoln Stein,David C Molik

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbae122

IF: 9.5

2024-04-02

Briefings in Bioinformatics

Abstract:The lack of interoperable data standards among reference genome data-sharing platforms inhibits cross-platform analysis while increasing the risk of data provenance loss. Here, we describe the FAIR bioHeaders Reference genome (FHR), a metadata standard guided by the principles of Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability and Reuse (FAIR) in addition to the principles of Transparency, Responsibility, User focus, Sustainability and Technology. The objective of FHR is to provide an extensive set of data serialisation methods and minimum data field requirements while still maintaining extensibility, flexibility and expressivity in an increasingly decentralised genomic data ecosystem. The effort needed to implement FHR is low; FHR's design philosophy ensures easy implementation while retaining the benefits gained from recording both machine and human-readable provenance.

biochemical research methods,mathematical & computational biology
[Solitude and isolation: psychological, psychopathological and criminological aspects (with reference to cattle stealing)].

A. Semerari,A. Castellani,A. Balloni

1967-06-30

Abstract:
An automated solution for measuring the progress toward FAIR research data

Anusuriya Devaraju,Robert Huber

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2021.100370

2021-11-01

Patterns

Abstract:With a rising number of scientific datasets published and the need to test their Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable (FAIR) compliance repeatedly, data stakeholders have recognized the importance of an automated FAIR assessment. This paper presents a programmatic solution for assessing the FAIRness of research data. We describe the translation of the FAIR data principles into measurable metrics and the application of the metrics in evaluating FAIR compliance of research data through an open-source tool we developed. For each metric, we conceptualized and implemented practical tests drawn upon prevailing data curation and sharing practices, and the paper discusses their rationales. We demonstrate the work by evaluating multidisciplinary datasets from trustworthy repositories, followed by recommendations and improvements. We believe our experience in developing and applying the metrics in practice and the lessons we learned from it will provide helpful information to others developing similar approaches to assess different types of digital objects and services.
Recommendations for extending the GFF3 specification for improved interoperability of genomic data

Surya Saha,Scott Cain,Ethalinda K. S. Cannon,Nathan Dunn,Andrew Farmer,Zhi-Liang Hu,Gareth Maslen,Sierra Moxon,Christopher J Mungall,Rex Nelson,Monica F. Poelchau

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2202.07782

2022-02-16

Abstract:The GFF3 format is a common, flexible tab-delimited format representing the structure and function of genes or other mapped features (<a class="link-external link-https" href="https://github.com/The-Sequence-Ontology/Specifications/blob/master/gff3.md" rel="external noopener nofollow">this https URL</a>). However, with increasing re-use of annotation data, this flexibility has become an obstacle for standardized downstream processing. Common software packages that export annotations in GFF3 format model the same data and metadata in different notations, which puts the burden on end-users to interpret the data model. The AgBioData consortium is a group of genomics, genetics and breeding databases and partners working towards shared practices and standards. Providing concrete guidelines for generating GFF3, and creating a standard representation of the most common biological data types would provide a major increase in efficiency for AgBioData databases and the genomics research community that use the GFF3 format in their daily operations. The AgBioData GFF3 working group has developed recommendations to solve common problems in the GFF3 format. We suggest improvements for each of the GFF3 fields, as well as the special cases of modeling functional annotations, and standard protein-coding genes. We welcome further discussion of these recommendations. We request the genomics and bioinformatics community to utilize the github repository (<a class="link-external link-https" href="https://github.com/NAL-i5K/AgBioData_GFF3_recommendation" rel="external noopener nofollow">this https URL</a>) to provide feedback via issues or pull requests.

Other Quantitative Biology
From Planning Stage To FAIR Data: A Practical Metadatasheet For Biomedical Scientists

Lea Seep,Stephan Grein,Iva Splichalova,Danli Ran,Mickel Mikhael,Staffan Hildebrand,Mario Lauterbach,Karsten Hiller,Dalila Juliana Silva Ribeiro,Katharina Sieckmann,Ronja Kardinal,Hao Huang,Jiangyan Yu,Sebastian Kallabis,Janina Behrens,Andreas Till,Viktoriya Peeva,Akim Strohmeyer,Johanna Bruder,Tobias Blum,Ana Soriano-Arroquia,Dominik Tischer,Katharina Kuellmer,Yuanfang Li,Marc Beyer,Anne-Kathrin Gellner,Tobias Fromme,Henning Wackerhage,Martin Klingenspor,Wiebke K. Fenske,Ludger Scheja,Felix Meissner,Andreas Schlitzer,Elvira Mass,Dagmar Wachten,Eicke Latz,Alexander Pfeifer,Jan Hasenauer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.27.577552

2024-01-30

Abstract:Datasets consist of measurement data and metadata. Metadata provides context, essential for understanding and (re-)using data. Various metadata standards exist for different methods, systems and contexts. However, relevant information resides at differing stages across the data-lifecycle. Often, this information is defined and standardized only at publication stage, which can lead to data loss and workload increase. In this study, we developed Metadatasheet, a metadata standard based on interviews with members of two biomedical consortia and systematic screening of data repositories. It aligns with the data-lifecycle allowing synchronous metadata recording within Microsoft Excel, a widespread data recording software. Additionally, we provide an implementation, the Metadata Workbook, that offers user-friendly features like automation, dynamic adaption, metadata integrity checks, and export options for various metadata standards. By design and due to its extensive documentation, the proposed metadata standard simplifies recording and structuring of metadata for biomedical scientists, promoting practicality and convenience in data management. This framework can accelerate scientific progress by enhancing collaboration and knowledge transfer throughout the intermediate steps of data creation.

Bioinformatics
Associate and baccalaureate degree preparation for future practice of psychiatric-mental health nursing.

C. M. Taylor

Abstract:
From Planning Stage Towards FAIR Data: A Practical Metadatasheet For Biomedical Scientists

Lea Seep,Stephan Grein,Iva Splichalova,Danli Ran,Mickel Mikhael,Staffan Hildebrand,Mario Lauterbach,Karsten Hiller,Dalila Juliana Silva Ribeiro,Katharina Sieckmann,Ronja Kardinal,Hao Huang,Jiangyan Yu,Sebastian Kallabis,Janina Behrens,Andreas Till,Viktoriya Peeva,Akim Strohmeyer,Johanna Bruder,Tobias Blum,Ana Soriano-Arroquia,Dominik Tischer,Katharina Kuellmer,Yuanfang Li,Marc Beyer,Anne-Kathrin Gellner,Tobias Fromme,Henning Wackerhage,Martin Klingenspor,Wiebke K. Fenske,Ludger Scheja,Felix Meissner,Andreas Schlitzer,Elvira Mass,Dagmar Wachten,Eicke Latz,Alexander Pfeifer,Jan Hasenauer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-024-03349-2

2024-05-22

Scientific Data

Abstract:Abstract Datasets consist of measurement data and metadata. Metadata provides context, essential for understanding and (re-)using data. Various metadata standards exist for different methods, systems and contexts. However, relevant information resides at differing stages across the data-lifecycle. Often, this information is defined and standardized only at publication stage, which can lead to data loss and workload increase. In this study, we developed Metadatasheet, a metadata standard based on interviews with members of two biomedical consortia and systematic screening of data repositories. It aligns with the data-lifecycle allowing synchronous metadata recording within Microsoft Excel, a widespread data recording software. Additionally, we provide an implementation, the Metadata Workbook, that offers user-friendly features like automation, dynamic adaption, metadata integrity checks, and export options for various metadata standards. By design and due to its extensive documentation, the proposed metadata standard simplifies recording and structuring of metadata for biomedical scientists, promoting practicality and convenience in data management. This framework can accelerate scientific progress by enhancing collaboration and knowledge transfer throughout the intermediate steps of data creation.

multidisciplinary sciences
Shared Metadata for Data-Centric Materials Science

Luca M. Ghiringhelli,Carsten Baldauf,Tristan Bereau,Sandor Brockhauser,Christian Carbogno,Javad Chamanara,Stefano Cozzini,Stefano Curtarolo,Claudia Draxl,Shyam Dwaraknath,Ádám Fekete,James Kermode,Christoph T. Koch,Markus Kühbach,Alvin Noe Ladines,Patrick Lambrix,Maja-Olivia Lenz-Himmer,Sergey Levchenko,Micael Oliveira,Adam Michalchuk,Ron Miller,Berk Onat,Pasquale Pavone,Giovanni Pizzi,Benjamin Regler,Gian-Marco Rignanese,Jörg Schaarschmidt,Markus Scheidgen,Astrid Schneidewind,Tatyana Sheveleva,Chuanxun Su,Denis Usvyat,Omar Valsson,Christof Wöll,Matthias Scheffler

2023-08-23

Abstract:The expansive production of data in materials science, their widespread sharing and repurposing requires educated support and stewardship. In order to ensure that this need helps rather than hinders scientific work, the implementation of the FAIR-data principles (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable) must not be too narrow. Besides, the wider materials-science community ought to agree on the strategies to tackle the challenges that are specific to its data, both from computations and experiments. In this paper, we present the result of the discussions held at the workshop on "Shared Metadata and Data Formats for Big-Data Driven Materials Science". We start from an operative definition of metadata, and what features a FAIR-compliant metadata schema should have. We will mainly focus on computational materials-science data and propose a constructive approach for the FAIRification of the (meta)data related to ground-state and excited-states calculations, potential-energy sampling, and generalized workflows. Finally, challenges with the FAIRification of experimental (meta)data and materials-science ontologies are presented together with an outlook of how to meet them.

Materials Science
FAIRsoft—A practical implementation of FAIR principles for research software

Eva Martín del Pico,Josep Lluis Gelpí,Salvador Capella-Gutiérrez

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btae464

IF: 5.8

2024-07-22

Bioinformatics

Abstract:Abstract Motivation Software plays a crucial and growing role in research. Unfortunately, the computational component in Life Sciences research is often challenging to reproduce and verify. It could be undocumented, opaque, contain unknown errors that affect the outcome, or be directly unavailable and impossible to use for others. These issues are detrimental to the overall quality of scientific research. One step to address this problem is the formulation of principles that research software in the domain should meet to ensure its quality and sustainability, resembling the FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable) Data Principles. Results We present here a comprehensive series of quantitative indicators based on a pragmatic interpretation of the FAIR Principles and their implementation on OpenEBench, ELIXIR’s open platform providing both support for scientific benchmarking and an active observatory of quality-related features for Life Sciences research software. The results serve to understand the current practices around research software quality-related features and provide objective indications for improving them. Availability Software metadata, from 11 different sources, collected, integrated and analysed in the context of this manuscript are available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7311067. Code used for software metadata retrieval and processing is available in the following repository https://gitlab.bsc.es/inb/elixir/software-observatory/FAIRsoft_ETL. Supplementary information Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

biochemical research methods,biotechnology & applied microbiology,mathematical & computational biology
A Metadata-Based Ecosystem to Improve the FAIRness of Research Software

Patrick Kuckertz,Jan Göpfert,Oliver Karras,David Neuroth,Julian Schönau,Rodrigo Pueblas,Stephan Ferenz,Felix Engel,Noah Pflugradt,Jann M. Weinand,Astrid Nieße,Sören Auer,Detlef Stolten

2023-06-19

Abstract:The reuse of research software is central to research efficiency and academic exchange. The application of software enables researchers with varied backgrounds to reproduce, validate, and expand upon study findings. Furthermore, the analysis of open source code aids in the comprehension, comparison, and integration of approaches. Often, however, no further use occurs because relevant software cannot be found or is incompatible with existing research processes. This results in repetitive software development, which impedes the advancement of individual researchers and entire research communities. In this article, the DataDesc ecosystem is presented, an approach to describing data models of software interfaces with detailed and machine-actionable metadata. In addition to a specialized metadata schema, an exchange format and support tools for easy collection and the automated publishing of software documentation are introduced. This approach practically increases the FAIRness, i.e., findability, accessibility, interoperability, and so the reusability of research software, as well as effectively promotes its impact on research.

Software Engineering
Metadata harmonization-Standards are the key for a better usage of omics data for integrative microbiome analysis

Tomislav Cernava,Daria Rybakova,François Buscot,Thomas Clavel,Alice Carolyn McHardy,Fernando Meyer,Folker Meyer,Jörg Overmann,Bärbel Stecher,Angela Sessitsch,Michael Schloter,Gabriele Berg,MicrobiomeSupport Team,Paulo Arruda,Thomas Bartzanas,Tanja Kostic,Paula Iara Brennan,Bárbara Bort Biazotti,Marie-Christine Champomier-Verges,Trevor Charles,Mairead Coakley,Paul Cotter,Don Cowan,Kathleen D'Hondt,Ilario Ferrocino,Kristina Foterek,Gema Herrero-Corral,Carly Huitema,Janet Jansson,Shuang-Jiang Liu,Paula Malloy,Emmanuelle Maguin,Lidia Markiewicz,Ryan Mcclure,Andreas Moser,Jolien Roovers,Matthew Ryan,Inga Sarand,Bettina Schelkle,Annelein Meisner,Ulrich Schurr,Joseph Selvin,Effie Tsakalidou,Martin Wagner,Steve Wakelin,Wiesław Wiczkowski,Hanna Winkler,Juanjuan Xiao,Christine J Bunthof,Rafael Soares Correa de Souza,Yolanda Sanz,Lene Lange,Hauke Smidt

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40793-022-00425-1

2022-06-24

Abstract:Background: Tremendous amounts of data generated from microbiome research studies during the last decades require not only standards for sampling and preparation of omics data but also clear concepts of how the metadata is prepared to ensure re-use for integrative and interdisciplinary microbiome analysis. Results: In this Commentary, we present our views on the key issues related to the current system for metadata submission in omics research, and propose the development of a global metadata system. Such a system should be easy to use, clearly structured in a hierarchical way, and should be compatible with all existing microbiome data repositories, following common standards for minimal required information and common ontology. Although minimum metadata requirements are essential for microbiome datasets, the immense technological progress requires a flexible system, which will have to be constantly improved and re-thought. While FAIR principles (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable) are already considered, international legal issues on genetic resource and sequence sharing provided by the Convention on Biological Diversity need more awareness and engagement of the scientific community. Conclusions: The suggested approach for metadata entries would strongly improve retrieving and re-using data as demonstrated in several representative use cases. These integrative analyses, in turn, would further advance the potential of microbiome research for novel scientific discoveries and the development of microbiome-derived products.
Assimilate translocation and expression of sucrose transporter, OsSUT1, contribute to high-performance ripening under heat stress in the heat-tolerant rice cultivar Genkitsukushi.

Masayuki Miyazaki,M. Araki,Kenta Okamura,Yushi Ishibashi,T. Yuasa,M. Iwaya‐Inoue

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2013.06.011

IF: 3.686

2013-12-15

Journal of Plant Physiology

Abstract:
Applying FAIRness: Redesigning a Biomedical Informatics Research Data Management Pipeline

Marcel Parciak,Theresa Bender,Ulrich Sax,Christian Robert Bauer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1709158

IF: 1.8

2019-12-01

Methods of Information in Medicine

Abstract:Abstract Background Managing research data in biomedical informatics research requires solid data governance rules to guarantee sustainable operation, as it generally involves several professions and multiple sites. As every discipline involved in biomedical research applies its own set of tools and methods, research data as well as applied methods tend to branch out into numerous intermediate and output data objects, making it very difficult to reproduce research results. Objectives This article gives an overview of our implementation status applying the Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability and Reusability (FAIR) Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship onto our research data management pipeline focusing on the software tools that are in use. Methods We analyzed our progress FAIRificating the whole data management pipeline, from processing non-FAIR data up to data usage. We looked at software tools for data integration, data storage, and data usage as well as how the FAIR Guiding Principles helped to choose appropriate tools for each task. Results We were able to advance the degree of FAIRness of our data integration as well as data storage solutions, but lack enabling more FAIR Guiding Principles regarding Data Usage. Existing evaluation methods regarding the FAIR Guiding Principles (FAIRmetrics) were not applicable to our analysis of software tools. Conclusion Using the FAIR Guiding Principles, we FAIRificated relevant parts of our research data management pipeline improving findability, accessibility, interoperability and reuse of datasets and research results. We aim to implement the FAIRmetrics to our data management infrastructure and—where required—to contribute to the FAIRmetrics for research data in the biomedical informatics domain as well as for software tools to achieve a higher degree of FAIRness of our research data management pipeline.
Shallow Angle Wave Profiling LIDAR

M. Belmont,J. Horwood,R. Thurley,J. Baker

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/CCM.2008.4480871

2008-03-17

Abstract:A LIDAR scanning system is described which is primarily designed to measure sea wave shape. The device is capable of measuring real-time spatial profiles over distances of hundreds of metres and as the LIDAR must inevitably operate from modest elevations, eg., from a vessels mast head it is inherently a very shallow angle metrology device. This results in a highly nonuniform distribution of the wave elevation values. The vertical and horizontal resolution is primarily set by the characteristics of the optical system employed and range/data capacity is set by signal to noise ratio considerations. Illustrative data is presented as consecutive profiles taken 0.2 sec apart for highly trochoidal wave under conditions where the height was recorded to +_ 0.03 m and horizontal sample separation to +_0.025 m. A comparison is presented with traditional wave staff measurements.
The Vision of the FAIR Digital Object Machine and Ubiquitous FDO Services

Peter Wittenburg,Christophe Blanchi,Claus Weiland,Ivonne Anders,Karsten Peters,Ulrich Schwardmann,George Strawn

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.8.e95268

2022-10-13

Research Ideas and Outcomes

Abstract:In addition to the previous intensive discussion on the "Data Deluge" with respect to enormous increase of available research data, the 2022 Internet-of-Things conference confirmed that in the near future there will be billions if not trillions of smart IoT devices in a very wide range of applications and locations, many of them with computational capacities. This large number of distributed IoT devices will create continuous streams of data that will require a global framework to facilitate their integration into the Internet to enable controlled access to their data and services, to name but a few aspects. This framework would enable tracking of these IoT devices to measure their resource usage for instance to globally address the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Additionally, policy makers are committed to define regulations to break data monopolies and increase sharing. The result will be an increasingly huge domain of accessible digital data which on the one hand allows addressing new challenges especially cross-sector ones. A key prerequisite for this is to find the right data across domain boundaries supporting a specific task.Digitisation is already being called the fourth industrial revolution and the emerging data and information is the 21st century's new resource. Currently this vision is mostly unrealised due to the inability of existing data and digital resources to be findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable despite the progress in providing thematic catalogs. As a result, the capacity of this new resource is latent and mostly underutilized. There is no Internet level infrastructure that currently exists to facilitate the process by which all data and digital resources are made consistently and globally accessible. There are patchworks of localized and limited access to trusted data on the Internet created by specific communities that have been funded or directed to collaborate.To turn digital information into a commodity, description, access to, validation, and processing of data needs to become part of the Internet infrastructure we call the Global Integrated Data Space (GIDS). The main pillars of this approach require that data and services be globally identified and consistently accessed, with predictive descriptions and access control to make them globally findable.Currently researchers are relying partly on informal knowledge such as knowing the labs and persons to maximize the chance to access trustworthy data, but this method is limiting the use of suitable data. In the future data scenario, other mechanisms will become possible. In the public information space Google-like searches using specific key terms have become an accepted solution to find documents for human consumption. This approach however, does not work in the GIDS with large numbers of data contributors from a wide range of institutions, from millions of IoT devices worldwide, and where a wide range of data types and automatic data processing procedures dominate. Indeed, successful labs that apply complex models describing digital surrogates can automatically leverage data and data processing procedures from other labs. This makes the currently often operationally applied manual stitching of data and operations too costly both in time and resources to be a competitive option. A researcher looking for specific brain imaging data for a specific study has a few options:Rely on a network of colleagues.Execute Google-like searches in known registries looking for appropriate departments and researchers.Execute Google-like searches on suitable data.He/she engages an agent to execute profile matching in suitable sub-spaces.We assume that data creators will have the capability and be interested to create detailed metadata of different types and that the researchers, who are looking for specific data, will be able to specify precise profiles for data they are looking for. Two of the key characteristics of the future data space will be operations that can carry out profile matching at ultra-high speeds and that will lead to various subspaces according to some facets using self-organizing mechanisms. Of course, this poses high requirements on the metadata quality being used and that creators and potential consumers share knowledge about the semantic space in which they operate, and available semantic mappings used by brokers or self-provided. Metadata must be highly detailed and suitable schemas have been developed already in many communities. In addition to the usual metadata, potential users will need to specify their credentials in the form of trusted roles and their usage purposes to indicate access opportunities.Changing current metadata practices to yield richer metadata as presribed by the FAIR principles will not be simple, especially since we seem to be far away from formalizing roles and usage purposes in a broadly accepted way, but the pressure to create rich and s -Abstract Truncated-
Perceptual and technical barriers in sharing and formatting metadata accompanying omics studies

Yu-Ning Huang,Michael I. Love,Cynthia Flaire Ronkowski,Dhrithi Deshpande,Lynn M. Schriml,Annie Wong-Beringer,Barend Mons,Russell Corbett-Detig,Christopher I Hunter,Jason H. Moore,Lana X. Garmire,T.B.K. Reddy,Winston A. Hide,Atul J. Butte,Mark D. Robinson,Serghei Mangul

2023-11-23

Abstract:Metadata, often termed "data about data," is crucial for organizing, understanding, and managing vast omics datasets. It aids in efficient data discovery, integration, and interpretation, enabling users to access, comprehend, and utilize data effectively. Its significance spans the domains of scientific research, facilitating data reproducibility, reusability, and secondary analysis. However, numerous perceptual and technical barriers hinder the sharing of metadata among researchers. These barriers compromise the reliability of research results and hinder integrative meta-analyses of omics studies . This study highlights the key barriers to metadata sharing, including the lack of uniform standards, privacy and legal concerns, limitations in study design, limited incentives, inadequate infrastructure, and the dearth of well-trained personnel for metadata management and reuse. Proposed solutions include emphasizing the promotion of standardization, educational efforts, the role of journals and funding agencies, incentives and rewards, and the improvement of infrastructure. More accurate, reliable, and impactful research outcomes are achievable if the scientific community addresses these barriers, facilitating more accurate, reliable, and impactful research outcomes.

Digital Libraries
Bioassay protocol metadata annotation: Proposed standards adoption

Rama Balakrishnan,Ellen L Berg,Christopher C Butler,Alex M Clark,Sheryl P Denker,Isabella Feierberg,Jason Harris,Timothy P Ikeda,Samantha Jeschonek,Vladimir A Makarov,Christopher Southan,Dana Vanderwall,Peter Winstanley

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.slasd.2024.100188

2024-10-19

Abstract:We present a standardized metadata template for assays used in pharmaceutical drug discovery research, according to the FAIR principles. We also describe the use of an automated tool for annotating assays from a variety of sources, including PubChem, commercial assay providers, and the peer-reviewed literature, to this metadata template. Adoption of a standardized metadata template will allow drug discovery scientists to better understand and compare the increasing amounts of assay data becoming available, and will facilitate the use of artificial intelligence tools and other computational methods for analysis and prediction. Since bioassays drive advances in biomedical research, improvements in assay metadata can improve productivity in discovery of new therapeutics, platform technologies, and assay methods.
The FAIR Funder pilot programme to make it easy for funders to require and for grantees to produce FAIR Data

P. Wittenburg,H. Pergl Sustkova,A. Montesanti,S. M. Bloemers,S. H. de Waard,M. A. Musen,J. B. Graybeal,K. M. Hettne,A. Jacobsen,R. Pergl,R. W. W. Hooft,C. Staiger,C. W. G. van Gelder,S. L. Knijnenburg,A.C. van Arkel,B. Meerman,M. D. Wilkinson,S-A Sansone,P. Rocca-Serra,P. McQuilton,A. N. Gonzalez-Beltran,G. J. C. Aben,P. Henning,S. Alencar,C. Ribeiro,C. R. L. Silva,L. Sayao,L. Sales,V. Veiga,J. Lima,S. Dib,P. Xavier,R. Murtinho,J. Tendel,B. F. Schaap,P. M. Brouwer,A. K. Gavai,Y. Bouzembrak,H. J. P. Marvin,A. Mons,T. Kuhn,A. A. Gambardella,R. de Miranda Azevedo,V. Muhonen,M. van der Naald,N. W. Smit,M. J. Buys,T. F. de Bruin,F. Schoots,H. J. E. Goodson,H. S. Rzepa,K. G. Jeffery,H. P. Shanahan,M. Axton,V. Tkachenko,A. D. Maya,N. K. Meyers,M. Conlon,L. L. Haak,E. A. Schultes

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1902.11162

2019-03-06

Abstract:There is a growing acknowledgement in the scientific community of the importance of making experimental data machine findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable (FAIR). Recognizing that high quality metadata are essential to make datasets FAIR, members of the GO FAIR Initiative and the Research Data Alliance (RDA) have initiated a series of workshops to encourage the creation of Metadata for Machines (M4M), enabling any self-identified stakeholder to define and promote the reuse of standardized, comprehensive machine-actionable metadata. The funders of scientific research recognize that they have an important role to play in ensuring that experimental results are FAIR, and that high quality metadata and careful planning for FAIR data stewardship are central to these goals. We describe the outcome of a recent M4M workshop that has led to a pilot programme involving two national science funders, the Health Research Board of Ireland (HRB) and the Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMW). These funding organizations will explore new technologies to define at the time that a request for proposals is issued the minimal set of machine-actionable metadata that they would like investigators to use to annotate their datasets, to enable investigators to create such metadata to help make their data FAIR, and to develop data-stewardship plans that ensure that experimental data will be managed appropriately abiding by the FAIR principles. The FAIR Funders design envisions a data-management workflow having seven essential stages, where solution providers are openly invited to participate. The initial pilot programme will launch using existing computer-based tools of those who attended the M4M Workshop.

Digital Libraries
Enabling FAIR data in Earth and environmental science with community-centric (meta)data reporting formats

Robert Crystal-Ornelas,Charuleka Varadharajan,Dylan O’Ryan,Kathleen Beilsmith,Benjamin Bond-Lamberty,Kristin Boye,Madison Burrus,Shreyas Cholia,Danielle S. Christianson,Michael Crow,Joan Damerow,Kim S. Ely,Amy E. Goldman,Susan L. Heinz,Valerie C. Hendrix,Zarine Kakalia,Kayla Mathes,Fianna O’Brien,Stephanie C. Pennington,Emily Robles,Alistair Rogers,Maegen Simmonds,Terri Velliquette,Pamela Weisenhorn,Jessica Nicole Welch,Karen Whitenack,Deborah A. Agarwal

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01606-w

2022-11-15

Scientific Data

Abstract:Research can be more transparent and collaborative by using Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable (FAIR) principles to publish Earth and environmental science data. Reporting formats—instructions, templates, and tools for consistently formatting data within a discipline—can help make data more accessible and reusable. However, the immense diversity of data types across Earth science disciplines makes development and adoption challenging. Here, we describe 11 community reporting formats for a diverse set of Earth science (meta)data including cross-domain metadata (dataset metadata, location metadata, sample metadata), file-formatting guidelines (file-level metadata, CSV files, terrestrial model data archiving), and domain-specific reporting formats for some biological, geochemical, and hydrological data (amplicon abundance tables, leaf-level gas exchange, soil respiration, water and sediment chemistry, sensor-based hydrologic measurements). More broadly, we provide guidelines that communities can use to create new (meta)data formats that integrate with their scientific workflows. Such reporting formats have the potential to accelerate scientific discovery and predictions by making it easier for data contributors to provide (meta)data that are more interoperable and reusable.

multidisciplinary sciences
Evaluating FAIR-Compliance Through an Objective, Automated, Community-Governed Framework

Mark D Wilkinson,Michel Dumontier,Susanna-Assunta Sansone,Luiz Olavo Bonino da Silva Santos,Mario Prieto,Peter McQuilton,Julian Gautier,Derek Murphy,Mercѐ Crosas,Erik Schultes

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/418376

2018-09-16

Abstract:Abstract With the increased adoption of the FAIR Principles, a wide range of stakeholders, from scientists to publishers, funding agencies and policy makers, are seeking ways to transparently evaluate resource FAIRness. We describe the FAIR Evaluator, a software infrastructure to register and execute tests of compliance with the recently published FAIR Metrics. The Evaluator enables digital resources to be assessed objectively and transparently. We illustrate its application to three widely used generalist repositories - Dataverse, Dryad, and Zenodo - and report their feedback. Evaluations allow communities to select relevant Metric subsets to deliver FAIRness measurements in diverse and specialized applications. Evaluations are executed in a semi-automated manner through Web Forms filled-in by a user, or through a JSON-based API. A comparison of manual vs automated evaluation reveals that automated evaluations are generally stricter, resulting in lower, though more accurate, FAIRness scores. Finally, we highlight the need for enhanced infrastructure such as standards registries, like FAIRsharing, as well as additional community involvement in domain-specific data infrastructure creation.

The new eubacterium Roseomonas baikalica sp. nov. isolated from core samples collected by deep-hole drilling of the bottom of Lake Baikal

FAIR Header Reference genome: a TRUSTworthy standard

[Solitude and isolation: psychological, psychopathological and criminological aspects (with reference to cattle stealing)].

An automated solution for measuring the progress toward FAIR research data

Recommendations for extending the GFF3 specification for improved interoperability of genomic data

From Planning Stage To FAIR Data: A Practical Metadatasheet For Biomedical Scientists

Associate and baccalaureate degree preparation for future practice of psychiatric-mental health nursing.

From Planning Stage Towards FAIR Data: A Practical Metadatasheet For Biomedical Scientists

Shared Metadata for Data-Centric Materials Science

FAIRsoft—A practical implementation of FAIR principles for research software

A Metadata-Based Ecosystem to Improve the FAIRness of Research Software

Metadata harmonization-Standards are the key for a better usage of omics data for integrative microbiome analysis

Assimilate translocation and expression of sucrose transporter, OsSUT1, contribute to high-performance ripening under heat stress in the heat-tolerant rice cultivar Genkitsukushi.

Applying FAIRness: Redesigning a Biomedical Informatics Research Data Management Pipeline

Shallow Angle Wave Profiling LIDAR

The Vision of the FAIR Digital Object Machine and Ubiquitous FDO Services

Perceptual and technical barriers in sharing and formatting metadata accompanying omics studies

Bioassay protocol metadata annotation: Proposed standards adoption

The FAIR Funder pilot programme to make it easy for funders to require and for grantees to produce FAIR Data

Enabling FAIR data in Earth and environmental science with community-centric (meta)data reporting formats

Evaluating FAIR-Compliance Through an Objective, Automated, Community-Governed Framework