Harmonizing quality measures of FAIRness assessment towards machine-actionable quality information
Ge Peng Gary Berg-Cross Mingfang Wu Robert R. Downs Sudhir R. Shrestha Lesley Wyborn Nancy Ritchey Hampapuram K. Ramapriyan S. Jeanette Clark Jenny Wood Zhong Liu Abdelhak Marouane a Earth System Science Center,The University of Alabama in Huntsville,Huntsville,AL,USAb Ontolog Forum Board,Potomac,MD,USAc Australian Research Data Commons,Melbourne,Australiad Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN),Columbia Climate School,Columbia University,Palisades,NY,USAe Office of Water Prediction (OWP),National Weather Service,National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),Silver Spring,MD,USAf National Computational Infrastructure,Australian National University,Canberra,Australiag NOAA's National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI),Asheville,NC,USAh Science Systems and Applications,Inc.,Lanham,MD,USAi NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC),Greenbelt,MD,USAj National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis (NCEAS),University of California Santa Barbara,Santa Barbara,CA,USAk Center for Spatial Information Science and Systems (CSISS),George Mason University and NASA Goddard Earth Sciences Data (GES) and Information Services Center (DISC) NASA/GSFC,Greenbelt. MD,USA
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2024.2390431
IF: 4.606
2024-08-23
International Journal of Digital Earth
Abstract:FAIR Principles are a set of high-level guidelines for sharing digital resources. The growing global adoption of the FAIR Principles by policymakers, funders, and organizations compels data professionals, projects, and repositories to demonstrate the level of FAIR-compliance (referred to as FAIRness) of their digital data, metadata, and infrastructures. Because the FAIR Principles offer general objectives rather than specific implementation instructions, discrepancies exist due to different interpretations, domain-specific requirements, and intended applications. These discrepancies hinder direct comparisons and integration of assessment outcomes. To address this issue, we propose a novel framework, including a consolidated FAIR vocabulary. This framework establishes quality measures upfront in FAIRness assessment workflows to surpass the intricacies arising from the aforementioned dependencies. The established quality measures encapsulate the distinctive core concepts inherent in individual FAIR principles and can serve as common, fundamental pillars of holistic FAIRness assessment workflows. Building upon this fundamental set of the quality measures, we introduce a FAIRness quality maturity matrix (FAIR-QMM) as a structured, tiered, and progressive approach for evaluating and reporting the degree of FAIR-compliance. The FAIR-QMM can be used as a FAIRness assessment tool independently and/or as a translator between other FAIRness assessment tools or models.
geography, physical,remote sensing