An Apa I polymorphism for the human inter-alpha-trypsin inhibitor heavy chain gene ITIH1 on chromosome 3.

T. Léveillard,R. Sesboüé,J. Salier,J. Bourguignon,L. C. Le Gueult,M. Diarra‐Mehrpour,J. Martin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/NAR/17.7.2875

IF: 14.9

1989-04-11

Nucleic Acids Research

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Predicting Risk Factors for 30-Day Readmissions Following Discharge From Post-Acute Care

Nina M Flanagan,Victoria M Rizzo,Gary D James,Adele Spegman,Najla A Barnawi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/NCM.0000000000000261

Abstract:Purpose of study: The specific aims of this descriptive study were to (1) examine the relationships between individual-level determinants of health using standard care admission assessments of residents admitted to a skilled nursing facility (SNF) and those residents readmitted to the hospital within 30 days from discharge from the same SNF; (2) identify and describe the risk factors of the residents readmitted to the hospital within 30 days; and (3) use the findings to inform and refine current practice to target the mutable risk factors correlated with 30-day hospital readmission. Primary practice setting: A 180-bed skilled nursing center in Northeastern Pennsylvania. Methodology and sample: A retrospective paper medical record review of patients discharged from an SNF to community living was conducted to examine the relationship between individual determinants of health behaviors and 30-day hospital readmissions. The study sample (N = 221) included adults 65 years and older who were admitted to the SNF from January to December 2014 for subacute physical rehabilitation following an acute care hospital stay with a discharge plan to community living. Results: The 30-day readmission rate was 11%. The results of the logistic regression including diagnosis at readmission showed that the odds of readmission before 30 days were nearly three times greater in patients who had congestive heart failure (p < .02). Patients who were at "very high risk" on the Braden Scale were 20 times more likely to be readmitted before 30 days compared with those at low risk. Age and gender were not predictors. None of the other standard screening assessments for delirium, depression, functional status, and fall risk were predictive of 30-day readmission. Implications for case management practice: (1) Care coordination and communication with residents, caregivers, and home health can have an impact on 30-day readmissions post-SNF discharge. (2) Chronic respiratory diseases continue to be a challenge in prevention of hospital readmissions.
A Targeted Discharge Planning for High-Risk Readmissions: Focus on Patients and Caregivers

Eunice Park-Clinton,Susan Renda,Flint Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/NCM.0000000000000591

Abstract:Purpose of study: Racial and ethnic minorities with socioeconomic disadvantages are vulnerable to 30-day hospital readmissions. A 16-week quality improvement (QI) project aimed to decrease readmissions of the vulnerable patient populations through tailored discharge planning. The project evaluated the effectiveness of using a 25-item checklist to increase patients' and caregivers' health knowledge, skills, and willingness for self-care and decrease readmissions. Primary practice setting: The project took place in an inner-city teaching hospital in the Mid-Atlantic region. Methodology and participants: A casual comparative design compared readmissions of the before-intervention group (May 1-July 31, 2021) and the after-intervention group (August 1-October 31, 2021). A pre- and postintervention design evaluated the effectiveness of a 25-item checklist by analyzing the differences of Patient Activation Measure (PAM) pre- and postintervention survey scores and levels in the after-intervention group. Participants were General Medicine Unit patients 18 years or older who had Medicare Fee-for-Service, resided in 10 zip codes near the hospital, and were discharged home. Results: Of 30 patients who received the intervention, one patient was readmitted compared with 11 readmissions from 58 patients who did not receive the intervention. The readmission rate was decreased from 19% to 4% during the 16-week project: 11 (19%) versus 1 (4%), p = .038. After receiving the intervention, patients' PAM scores were increased by 8.55, t(22) = 2.67, p < .014. Three patients had a lower postintervention survey level, whereas 12 patients obtained a higher postintervention survey level (p = .01). The increase in scores and levels supported that the intervention effectively improved patients' self-management knowledge, skill, and willingness for self-care. Implications for case management practice: The QI project showed that the hospital could partner with patients at high risk for readmission and their caregivers. Accurate evaluation of patients' health knowledge, skills, and willingness for self-care was essential for sufficient discharge planning. Tailored use of the checklist improved patients' self-activation and functionally facilitated patients' and caregivers' care needs and capabilities. The checklist was statistically and clinically effective in decreasing 30-day hospital readmissions of vulnerable patient populations.
Understanding patient-centred readmission factors: a multi-site, mixed-methods study

S Ryan Greysen,James D Harrison,Sunil Kripalani,Eduard Vasilevskis,Edmondo Robinson,Joshua Metlay,Jeffery L Schnipper,David Meltzer,Neil Sehgal,Gregory W Ruhnke,Mark V Williams,Andrew D Auerbach

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004570

Abstract:Importance: Patient concerns at or before discharge inform many transitional care interventions; few studies examine patients' perceptions of self-care and other factors related to readmission. Objectives: To characterise patient-reported or caregiver-reported factors contributing to readmission. Design, setting and participants: Cross-sectional, national study of general medicine patients readmitted within 30 days at 12 US hospitals. Interviews included multiple-choice survey and open-ended survey questions of patients or their caregivers. Measurements: Multiple-choice survey quantified post-discharge difficulty in seven domains of self-care: medication use, contacting providers, transportation, basic needs (eg, food and shelter), diet, social support and substance abuse. Open-ended responses were coded into themes that added depth to the domains above or captured additional patient-centred concerns. Results: We interviewed 1066 readmitted patients. 91% reported understanding their discharge plan; however, only 37% reported that providers asked about barriers to carrying out the plan. 52% reported experiencing difficulty in ≥1 self-care domains ranging in frequency from 22% (diet) to 7% (substance use); 26% experienced difficulty in two or more domains. Among 508 patients (48% overall) who reported no difficulties in these domains, two-thirds either could not attribute their readmission to any specific difficulty (34%) or attributed their readmission to progression or persistence of their disease despite following their discharge plan (31%). Only 20% attributed their readmission to early discharge (8%), poor-quality hospital care (6%) or issues such as inadequate discharge instructions or follow-up care (6%). Limitations: The study population included only patients readmitted at academic medical centres and may not be representative of community-based care. Conclusion: Patients readmitted within 30 days reported understanding their discharge plans, but frequent difficulties in self-care and low anticipatory guidance for resolving these issues after discharge.
Abstract WP28: Closing The Revolving Door: Reducing Stroke Readmissions

Betty Robertson,Nili Steiner,Nicole Wolber,Rachel Izzo,Marissa Castro,Sonia Figueroa,Laurie B Paletz

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/str.54.suppl_1.WP28

IF: 10.17

2023-02-04

Stroke

Abstract:Stroke, Volume 54, Issue Suppl_1, Page AWP28-AWP28, February 1, 2023. Stroke is a leading cause of long-term disability where its impact and consequences can be pervasive. Although stroke management has evolved over the years, post stroke complications can lead to readmissions. It is estimated that approximately 90% of readmissions are unplanned resulting in an annual cost of $17.4 billion.The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) in the attempt to limit preventable readmissions has adjusted hospital reimbursement based on these rates to establish accountability. As a Comprehensive Stroke Center, we instituted benchmarks in the attempt to decrease our re-admission rates. We recognize that the transition from in patient to outpatient services can create a vulnerable period that increases the risk for readmissions.Smart aim:To decrease 30-day readmission rates in the Stroke population at Cedars Sinai Medical CenterImplementation process:We provided an inpatient pharmacist to implement stroke prevention medication education with an addition follow up phone call to address questions and confirm compliance. Secondly ensuring personalized Stroke education to patient and the families allowing assessment of needs prior to discharge. Thirdly calling our patients 7 days from discharge identifying if follow up appointments were made, prescription being taken and status in recovery.Results:From July 2020 to June 2021 the readmission rate was 9.5 %. Starting July 2021 to March 2022 we implemented the above modalities. This resulted in a decreased rate of 6.8% for this period.Conclusion:All the measures implemented made a significant improvement in the 30-day unplanned readmission rate for stroke patients. We recognized that inpatient and outpatient medication reconciliation provided one of the most significant factors that improved these rates. Proper medication education for patients and families improved adherence and in turn aids in secondary stroke prevention. Since this measure shows significant improvement, tracking and reviewing 90-day readmissions going forward seems prudent. Recognizing risk during this period allows the healthcare worker to intervene in anticipation of patients' needs allowing for better patient outcomes and satisfaction as well as lessen the economic toll of care.

peripheral vascular disease,clinical neurology
Causes and timing of 30-day rehospitalization from skilled nursing facilities after a hospital admission for pneumonia or sepsis

Melissa R. Riester,Elliott Bosco,Joe B. B. Silva,Barbara H. Bardenheier,Parag Goyal,Emily T. O’Neil,Robertus van Aalst,Ayman Chit,Stefan Gravenstein,Andrew R. Zullo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0260664

IF: 3.7

2022-01-20

PLoS ONE

Abstract:Background Pneumonia and sepsis are among the most common causes of hospitalization in the United States and often result in discharges to a skilled nursing facility (SNF) for rehabilitation. We described the timing and most common causes of 30-day unplanned hospital readmission following an index hospitalization for pneumonia or sepsis. Methods and findings This national retrospective cohort study included adults ≥65 years who were hospitalized for pneumonia or sepsis and were discharged to a SNF between July 1, 2012 and July 4, 2015. We quantified the ten most common 30-day unplanned readmission diagnoses and estimated the daily risk of first unplanned rehospitalization for four causes of readmission (circulatory, infectious, respiratory, and genitourinary). The index hospitalization was pneumonia for 92,153 SNF stays and sepsis for 452,254 SNF stays. Of these SNF stays, 20.9% and 25.9%, respectively, resulted in a 30-day unplanned readmission. Overall, septicemia was the single most common readmission diagnosis for residents with an index hospitalization for pneumonia (16.7% of 30-day readmissions) and sepsis (22.4% of 30-day readmissions). The mean time to unplanned readmission was approximately 14 days overall. Respiratory causes displayed the highest daily risk of rehospitalization following index hospitalizations for pneumonia, while circulatory and infectious causes had the highest daily risk of rehospitalization following index hospitalizations for sepsis. The day of highest risk for readmission occurred within two weeks of the index hospitalization discharge, but the readmission risk persisted across the 30-day follow-up. Conclusion Among older adults discharged to SNFs following a hospitalization for pneumonia or sepsis, hospital readmissions for infectious, circulatory, respiratory, and genitourinary causes occurred frequently throughout the 30-day post-discharge period. Our data suggests further study is needed, perhaps on the value of closer monitoring in SNFs post-hospital discharge and improved communication between hospitals and SNFs, to reduce the risk of potentially preventable hospital readmissions.

multidisciplinary sciences
147-LB: Targeted Intervention for At-Risk Patients with Diabetes to Reduce Readmissions

ASHLEY HARRIS,KRISTINE GRDINOVAC

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2337/db21-147-lb

IF: 7.7

2021-06-01

Diabetes

Abstract:With benefits to patient outcomes, provider burden, and health system costs, the goal of reducing hospital readmissions for patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) is multifaceted. Current studies have neither elucidated a clear approach to accurately identify at-risk patients nor implemented reliable interventions to significantly reduce readmissions. We trialed a Quality Improvement project utilizing a diabetes Nurse Practitioner (NP)/Certified Diabetes Care and Education Specialist (CDCES) to see at-risk patients during initial hospitalization and in close clinic follow-up after discharge with an endpoint of reducing future readmissions. Over 21 months, 79 hospitalized patients with DM were identified as high-risk for readmission. Identifying factors included previous admission, DKA/HHS, new DM diagnosis, new to insulin, high-dose steroid use, or provider discretion. The NP/CDCES provided DM management, education, and coordinated discharge. Patients were called shortly after discharge and had a 2-4 week clinic follow-up with the NP/CDCES. The primary endpoint was number of readmissions 180 days post-discharge after NP/CDCES intervention versus number of previous readmissions pre-intervention. Change in hemoglobin A1C, time to post-hospital phone call, and time to outpatient follow-up were also evaluated. Pre- and post-intervention readmission rates remained unchanged; average pre-intervention readmissions per patient was 1.7 versus 1.88 post-intervention readmissions (p=0.74). However, a secondary endpoint of reduction in A1C was statistically significant, with a mean decrease in A1C of 0.97% per patient (p=0.0025). Time to post-hospital phone call and early follow-up did not affect readmission rates. While targeted inpatient-to-outpatient intervention for high-risk patients with DM did not reduce readmission rates, our data suggests coordinated inpatient intervention with close hospital follow-up may improve A1C in high-risk patients with diabetes. Disclosure A. Harris: None. K. Grdinovac: None.

endocrinology & metabolism
Case Management in Prevention of 30-Day Readmission in Post-Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery

Annapoorna Mary,Fawaz Mzayek,Leanne L Lefler,Yu Joyce Jiang,Meghan Meadows Taylor

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/NCM.0000000000000718

2024-03-01

Abstract:Purpose of study: Thirty-day readmission is associated with increased morbidity and mortality among postoperative coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery patients. Interventions such as case management and follow-up care may reduce 30-day readmission. The purpose of this article is to report a study on modifiable factors that may have significant implications for case management in the prevention of readmission after CABG surgery. Primary practice settings: The study population included all the adult patients who underwent first-time CABG surgery from January 1, 2013, to January 1, 2016, from a Mid-South hospital. Methodology and sample: A retrospective case-control study was employed to examine 1,712 patients who underwent CABG surgery. Results: The results revealed that patients readmitted within 30 days had a significantly shorter length of stay (LOS) (6 days vs. 10 days; p < .0001), more days in intensive care unit (6 days vs. 4 days; p = .0391), and significantly higher diabetes/renal (4% vs. 1%), infection (17% vs. 2%), and respiratory-related diagnoses (10% vs. 1%; p < .0001). Implications for case management practice: Among these factors, hospital LOS is a major factor that can be addressed through case management in addition to other modifiable risk factors. Understanding modifiable factors associated with higher readmission risk is crucial for effective intervention and case management planning.
Prevalence and risk factors associated within 48-hour unplanned paediatric intensive care unit readmissions: An integrative review

Martina K Barnwell,Huaqiong Zhou,Simon Erickson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aucc.2024.03.010

2024-05-08

Abstract:Background: Unplanned paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) readmission is associated with increased morbidity/mortality, hospital length of stay, and health service cost and is recognised as a key performance indicator of quality-of-care delivery. However, research evidence on unplanned PICU readmission risk factors is limited, and results were inconsistent across studies. Aim: The aim of this experiment was to collate and synthesise unplanned within-48-h PICU readmission prevalence and associated risk factors. Methods: An integrative review was conducted, guided by a five-stage framework. Seven electronic databases were searched (2013-30th June 2023). Studies published in English with full-text accessibility and detailed methodologies were included. The quality of included studies was critically appraised using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklists. Prevalence and risk factors were extracted, synthesised, and presented narratively. Results: Ten studies met eligibility criteria and reported a varied readmission rate from 0.008% to 6.49%. Fifteen types of significant risk factors were extracted. Twelve consistently cited risk factors were age, weight, complex chronic conditions, admission source, unplanned admission, PICU length of stay, positive pressure ventilation, discharge disposition, oxygen requirements, respiratory rate, heart rate, and Glasgow Coma Score at discharge. Of the 12, five predictors were classified as modifiable factors, including discharge disposition, oxygen requirement, abnormal respiratory rate, abnormal heart rate, and decreased Glasgow Coma Score at discharge. Conclusion: This review acknowledges the complexity of confounding factors impacting unplanned PICU readmission and the lack of standardisation examining potential risk factors. The five modifiable factors are suggestive of clinical instability and premature PICU discharge. Patients with modifiable risk factors should have their readiness for discharge re-evaluated. Scaffolding support to manage patients at risk of readmission includes senior bedside nursing allocation, use of PICU outreach services, and 1:2 nurse-to-patient ratios in the ward setting, which are warranted to ensure patient safety.
Reducing 30-day Acute Care Readmissions for Heart Failure Patients Through Implementation of a Discharge Bundle

Jason Lindsey,Teresa Welch

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/NCM.0000000000000766

2024-08-26

Abstract:Purpose: Hospital readmissions have been a long-standing problem in the American health care system. Despite many efforts, programs, papers, and interventions identified and studied, 14% of all adult admissions result in a readmission. Readmissions are mostly considered preventable and are considered an indicator of care quality for a hospital. Due to unexpected readmissions, patients are at an increased risk for illness or injury, increased stress, financial strain, and diminished quality of life. Readmissions also negatively impact hospital systems related to decreased bed availability, stretched resources, and potential financial penalties and payment reductions. Patients with an admission related to heart failure are at an increased risk of readmission, with a national readmission rate of 23%. Primary practice setting: The quality improvement project was implemented on two telemetry units at an acute care hospital. Methodology and sample: A gap analysis identified procedural and organizational reasons for readmission in the heart failure population at an acute care hospital. Using evidence-based best practice guidelines established by the American Heart Association, American College of Cardiology, and the Heart Failure Society of America, a four-pronged proactive discharge bundle was implemented using the plan-do-study-act framework for continuous improvement. All patients admitted to the telemetry units with a primary or secondary diagnosis of heart failure received the discharge planning bundle: (1) an early assessment by the case management department, (2) patient-centered specialty heart failure education, (3) predischarge medication delivery, and (4) predischarge physician follow-up appointment scheduling within 7 days of discharge. A total of 133 patients were evaluated for inclusion in the heart failure cohort. Of those, 52 patients received the evidence-based intervention. Results: The evidence-based project was implemented over 7 weeks, September through October of 2023 on the medical telemetry units. Of the 52 patients receiving the evidence-based sample, two of the patients experienced a readmission due to heart failure (3.85%). Incidentally, it was found that patients without a readmission had an average of 2.3 completed interventions, while those with readmissions had an average of 1.5 interventions. Implications for case management practice: Case managers are an integral part of the care transition from the acute care setting back to the community. Often, it is the case manager leading this effort through various interventions. Findings from this quality improvement project suggest the use of the evidence-based, four-pronged approach to discharge planning for the heart failure patient population reduced the risk and rate of heart failure-related readmissions for the involved nursing units. These findings also surmise that there is a correlation between the number of interventions and the rate of readmission.
Qualitative Study Assessing Factors for 30-day Readmissions: A Head and Neck Oncology Cohort

Simon Beatty,Joseph Penn,Mackenzie O'Donnell,Jennifer Villwock

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00034894221147809

Abstract:Objectives: There is a paucity of literature on what contributes to 30-day readmission rates from the patient's perspective in head and neck cancer patients. Post-operatively, these patients are often discharged with multiple surgical sites and home equipment requiring education and a large responsibility upon arriving home. Patients have a unique understanding of the discharge process and rationale behind presenting for care following initial discharge. Understanding the experience of the readmitted patient may be critical in finding effective methods to prevent unnecessary readmissions. Methods: Through key-informant interviews, we assessed factors that impact readmission rates from the patient perspective. Patients were eligible if they were discharged within the last 30 days and subsequently readmitted following an admission for a head and neck cancer surgery. Inductive coding was used to analyze interview transcripts and develop themes. Results: Thirteen respondents were interviewed. 46% (n = 6) did not feel ready for discharge after the index admission. Out of these 6 patients, 83% (n = 5) felt their readmission could have been avoided. Patients often encountered unexpected events after returning home from the index admission and felt their readmissions were potentially avoidable with more information regarding what to expect at home, prior to discharge. Although medically stable upon discharge, these findings indicate some patients might be discharged sooner than they should be due to factors outside of medical indications. Conclusions: To address the various biopsychosocial components of patient care in addition to medical aspects, an otolaryngology-specific, prior-to-discharge checklist could aid in lowering 30-day readmissions. Since the amount of education each patient requires to feel competent managing their health at home varies, more work is needed to craft post-education assessments of patient/caregiver competencies for home equipment, prior to discharge to reduce avoidable readmissions.
Effect of Discharge Readiness on 30-Day Readmissions Among Older Adults Living With Multiple Chronic Conditions

Colleen A. Pogue,Amelia E. Schlak,Matthew D. McHugh

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/mlr.0000000000001976

2024-01-17

Medical Care

Abstract:Background: Despite decreases in readmissions among Medicare beneficiaries after the implementation of the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program, older adults living with multiple chronic conditions (MCCs) continue to experience higher readmission rates. Few strategies leverage nursing to identify patients at risk for readmission. Objectives: Examine the effect of nurse assessments of discharge readiness on 30-day readmissions. Research Design: Cross-sectional study linking 3 secondary data sources (ie, nurse survey, hospital survey, and Medicare claims data) representing 424 hospitals. Subjects: A total of 188,806 Medicare surgical patients with MCCs. Measures: Discharge readiness was derived from the 2016 RN4CAST-US survey. Medicare claims data was used to determine the MCC count. The outcome was 30-day readmissions across the MCC count. Results: The average discharge readiness score was 0.45 (range=0–0.86) indicating that, in the average hospital, <50% of nurses were confident their patient or caregiver could manage their care after discharge. Nearly 8% of patients were readmitted within 30 days of discharge; the highest rates of readmissions were among individuals with ≥5 MCCs (4293, 13.50%). For each 10% increase in the proportion of nurses in a hospital who were confident in their patients’ discharge readiness, the odds of 30-day readmission decreased by 2% (95% CI: 0.96–1.00; P =0.028) for patients with 2–4 MCCs and 3% (95% CI: 0.94–0.99; P =0.015) for patients with ≥5 MCCs, relative to patients with 0–1 MCCs. Conclusions: Nurse assessments of discharge readiness may be a useful signal for hospitals to reduce readmissions and examine factors interfering with discharge processes.

public, environmental & occupational health,health care sciences & services,health policy & services
Early Prediction of Unplanned 30-Day Hospital Readmission: Model Development and Retrospective Data Analysis

Peng Zhao,Illhoi Yoo,Syed H Naqvi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/16306

IF: 3.2

2021-03-23

JMIR Medical Informatics

Abstract:Background Existing readmission reduction solutions tend to focus on complementing inpatient care with enhanced care transition and postdischarge interventions. These solutions are initiated near or after discharge, when clinicians’ impact on inpatient care is ending. Preventive intervention during hospitalization is an underexplored area that holds potential for reducing readmission risk. However, it is challenging to predict readmission risk at the early stage of hospitalization because few data are available. Objective The objective of this study was to build an early prediction model of unplanned 30-day hospital readmission using a large and diverse sample. We were also interested in identifying novel readmission risk factors and protective factors. Methods We extracted the medical records of 96,550 patients in 205 participating Cerner client hospitals across four US census regions in 2016 from the Health Facts database. The model was built with index admission data that can become available within 24 hours and data from previous encounters up to 1 year before the index admission. The candidate models were evaluated for performance, timeliness, and generalizability. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify readmission risk factors and protective factors. Results We developed six candidate readmission models with different machine learning algorithms. The best performing model of extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.753 on the development data set and 0.742 on the validation data set. By multivariate logistic regression analysis, we identified 14 risk factors and 2 protective factors of readmission that have never been reported. Conclusions The performance of our model is better than that of the most widely used models in US health care settings. This model can help clinicians identify readmission risk at the early stage of hospitalization so that they can pay extra attention during the care process of high-risk patients. The 14 novel risk factors and 2 novel protective factors can aid understanding of the factors associated with readmission.

medical informatics
Causes and Predictors of Unplanned Readmission in Cranial Neurosurgery

Caroline Sander,Henry Oppermann,Ulf Nestler,Katharina Sander,Nikolaus von Dercks,Juergen Meixensberger

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2021.01.123

Abstract:Objective: A better understanding of the risks and reasons for unplanned readmission is an essential component in reducing costs in the health care system and in optimizing patient safety and satisfaction. The reasons for unplanned readmission vary between different disciplines and procedures. The aim of this study was to identify reasons for readmission in view of different diagnoses in cranial neurosurgery. Methods: In this single-center retrospective study, adult patients after neurosurgical treatment were analyzed and grouped according to the indication based on International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision, German Modification diagnosis codes. The main outcome measure was unplanned readmission within 30 days of discharge. Further logistic regression models were performed to identify factors associated with unplanned rehospitalization. Results: Of the 2474 patients analyzed, 183 underwent unplanned rehospitalization. Readmission rates differed between the diagnosis groups, with 9.19% in neoplasm, 8.26% in hydrocephalus, 5.76% in vascular, 6.13% after trauma, and 8.05% in the functional group. Several causes were considered to be preventable, such as wound healing disorders, seizures, or social reasons. Younger age, length of first stay, surgical treatment, and side diagnoses were predictors for unplanned readmission. Diagnoses with an increased risk of readmission were glioblastoma, traumatic subdural hematoma, or chronic subdural hematoma. Conclusions: Reasons and predictors for an unplanned readmission differ considerably among the index diagnosis groups. In addition to well-known reasons for readmission, we identified social indication, meaning a lack of home care, which is particularly prevalent in oncologic and elderly patients. A transitional care program could benefit these vulnerable patients.
Suction loss during femtosecond laser–assisted small‐incision lenticule extraction: Incidence and analysis of risk factors

I. Osman,Ramy Awad,W. Shi,M. Shousha

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.10.067

2016-02-01

Abstract:
Surgical rehospitalization of the medicare fee-for-service patient: a state-level analysis exploring 30-day readmission factors

Mary Schmeida,Ronald Savrin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/NCM.0000000000000081

Abstract:Purpose of study: Surgical readmissions are a concern to the integrity of the Medicare Trust Fund and gaining attention from policymakers concerned about solvency. This study explores factors associated with variation in surgical readmission rates across the states and provides implications for Medicare Case Management. Primary practice setting(s): Acute inpatient hospital settings. Methodology and sample: Fifty state-level data and multivariate regression analysis are used. The dependent variable Surgical Discharge 30-day Readmission Rate is based on the Medicare Fee-For-Service beneficiary population with Medicare Part A and B insurance coverage and age 65 years or older, rehospitalized subsequent to an inpatient surgical procedure, occurring within 30 days of their last discharge. Results: Our 2 key explanatory variables-emergency room visit rate and total days of care-are each positively associated with 30-day surgical readmission rate. Age group 65-69 years, native language, physician density, and health care expenditures per capita also influence surgical readmission rate across the states. Implications for case management practice: Surgical readmission has an association with many different categories of variables-demographic, clinical process, hospital capacity, and patient need. This strongly suggests that Medicare case managers consider the wide range of elements contributing to surgical readmission and take a multifactorial approach to reducing the rehospitalization rate.
Reasons for readmission after hospital discharge in patients with chronic diseases-Information from an international dataset

Hans-Peter Brunner-La Rocca,Carol J Peden,John Soong,Per Arne Holman,Maria Bogdanovskaya,Lorna Barclay

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233457

IF: 3.7

2020-06-30

PLoS ONE

Abstract:Background: Chronic diseases are increasingly prevalent in Western countries. Once hospitalised, the chance for another hospitalisation increases sharply with large impact on well-being of patients and costs. The pattern of readmissions is very complex, but poorly understood for multiple chronic diseases. Methods: This cohort study of administrative discharge data between 2009-2014 from 21 tertiary hospitals (eight USA, five UK, four Australia, four continental Europe) investigated rates and reasons of readmissions to the same hospital within 30 days after unplanned admission with one of the following chronic conditions; heart failure; atrial fibrillation; myocardial infarction; hypertension; stroke; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD); bacterial pneumonia; diabetes mellitus; chronic renal disease; anaemia; arthritis and other cardiovascular disease. Proportions of readmissions with similar versus different diseases were analysed. Results: Of 4,901,584 admissions, 866,502 (17.7%) were due to the 12 chronic conditions. In-hospital, 43,573 (5.0%) patients died, leaving 822,929 for readmission analysis. Of those, 87,452 (10.6%) had an emergency 30-day readmission, rates ranged from 2.8% for arthritis to 18.4% for COPD. One third were readmitted with the same condition, ranging from 53% for anaemia to 11% for arthritis. Reasons for readmission were due to another chronic condition in 10% to 35% of the cases, leaving 30% to 70% due to reasons other than the original 12 conditions (most commonly, treatment related complications and infections). The chance of being readmitted with the same cause was lower in the USA, for female patients, with increasing age, more co-morbidities, during study period and with longer initial length of stay. Conclusion: Readmission in chronic conditions is very common and often caused by diseases other than the index hospitalisation. Interventions to reduce readmissions should therefore focus not only on the primary condition but on a holistic consideration of all the patient's comorbidities.
Decomposition of complete tripartite graphs into gregarious 4-cycles

E. Billington,D. Hoffman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-365X(02)00462-4

IF: 0.961

2003-01-28

Discrete Mathematics

Abstract:
Causes for 30‐day readmissions and accuracy of the LACE index in regional Victoria, Australia

Reinhardt Dreyer,James Gome

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.16324

2024-01-03

Internal Medicine Journal

Abstract:Background Clinicians and funders continue to search for ways to reduce costs without sacrificing quality of care. Ongoing research should focus on innovative care models that identify patients at high‐risk for hospitalisation and thereby reduce healthcare costs. Aims and Objectives This study examined readmission rates, comorbidity profiles and the performance of the LACEi (Length of stay, Acuity of admission, Charlson Comorbidity Index, ED admissions in the previous 6 months index) to predict the risk of 30‐day readmissions in a regional population. Furthermore, we tested a novel clinician‐orientated classification for the causes of 30‐day readmissions. Design Using a nested case–control design, data were extracted from administrative health records using 30‐day readmission status as the outcome. We defined cases as discharges within 30 days before readmission and controls without a discharge within 30 days before admission between 1 July 2020 and 30 June 2022. Setting The study was conducted at South West Healthcare in Victoria, Australia. Participants All adult medical patients were discharged alive from the facility. We excluded planned readmissions, surgical and obstetric admissions, dialysis, transfers to alternative facilities and discharges against medical advice. Main Outcome Measures Thirty‐day readmission rate, comorbidity profile for all admissions, LACEi for all admissions, the performance of the LACEi in our setting and the causes leading to readmission using a clinician‐orientated classification tool. Results Comorbidity burden, male sex and age > 65 years were associated with increased readmission risk but not length of stay. The LACEi demonstrated modest predictive ability to identify high‐risk patients for readmissions (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.59). Additional variables were needed to increase accuracy. The novel classification identified 42% of readmissions as potentially avoidable. Conclusion Our study identified comorbidity burden, male sex and age ≥ 65 years as critical indicators for readmission risk. Although the LACEi showed moderate predictive ability, additional variables were needed for increased accuracy. Over 40% of readmissions were potentially avoidable, and nearly two thirds occurred within 14 days of discharge from the hospital.

medicine, general & internal
Predictors and outcomes of unplanned readmission to a different hospital

Hongsoo Kim,William W Hung,Myunghee Cho Paik,Joseph S Ross,Zhonglin Zhao,Gi-Soo Kim,Kenneth Boockvar

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzv082

Abstract:Objectives: To examine patient, hospital and market factors and outcomes associated with readmission to a different hospital compared with the same hospital. Design: A population-based, secondary analysis using multilevel causal modeling. Setting: Acute care hospitals in California in the USA. Participants: In total, 509 775 patients aged 50 or older who were discharged alive from acute care hospitals (index hospitalizations), and 59 566 who had a rehospitalization within 30 days following their index discharge. Intervention: No intervention. Main outcome measure(s): Thirty-day unplanned readmissions to a different hospital compared with the same hospital and also the costs and health outcomes of the readmissions. Results: Twenty-one percent of patients with a rehospitalization had a different-hospital readmission. Compared with the same-hospital readmission group, the different-hospital readmission group was more likely to be younger, male and have a lower income. The index hospitals of the different-hospital readmission group were more likely to be smaller, for-profit hospitals, which were also more likely to be located in counties with higher competition. The different-hospital readmission group had higher odds for in-hospital death (8.1 vs. 6.7%; P < 0.0001) and greater readmission hospital costs ($15 671.8 vs. $14 286.4; P < 0.001) than the same-hospital readmission group. Conclusions: Patient, hospital and market characteristics predicted different-hospital readmissions compared with same-hospital readmissions. Mortality and cost outcomes were worse among patients with different-hospital readmissions. Strategies for better care coordination targeting people at risk for different-hospital readmissions are necessary.
Effects of Implementing a Health Team Communication Redesign on Hospital Readmissions Within 30 Days

Kristi Opper,Joseph Beiler,Olga Yakusheva,Marianne Weiss

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12350

2019-03-27

Abstract:BACKGROUND AND RATIONALE: Poor communication between health team members can interfere with timely, coordinated preparation for hospital discharge. Research on daily bedside interprofessional health team rounds and nursing bedside shift handoff reports provides evidence that these strategies can improve communication.AIMS: To improve health team communication and collaboration about hospital discharge; improve patient experience of discharge measured by patient-reported quality of discharge teaching, readiness for discharge, and postdischarge coping difficulty; and reduce readmissions and emergency department (ED) visits postdischarge.METHODS: A two-sample pre- and postintervention design provided baseline data for redesign of health team communication processes and comparison data for evaluation of the new process' impact. Health team members (n = 105 [pre], n = 95 [post]) from two surgical units of an academic medical center in the midwestern United States provided data on discharge-related communication and collaboration. Patients (n = 413 [pre], n = 191 [post]) provided data on their discharge experience (quality of discharge teaching, readiness for discharge, postdischarge coping difficulty) and outcomes (readmissions, ED visits). Chi-square and t tests were used for unadjusted pre- and postintervention comparisons. Logistic regression of readmissions with a matched pre- and postintervention sample included adjustments for patient characteristics and hospitalization factors.RESULTS: Readmissions decreased from 18% to 12% (p < .001); ED visits decreased from 4.4% to 1.5% (p < .001). Changes in health team communication and collaboration and patients' experience of discharge were minimal.DISCUSSION: The targeted outcomes of readmission and ED visits improved after the health team communication process redesign. The process indicators did not improve; potential explanations include unmeasured hospital and unit discharge, and other care process changes during the study timeframe.LINKING EVIDENCE TO PRACTICE: Evidence from daily interprofessional team bedside rounding and bedside shift report studies was translated into a redesign of health team communication for discharge. These strategies support readmission reduction efforts.

nursing

An Apa I polymorphism for the human inter-alpha-trypsin inhibitor heavy chain gene ITIH1 on chromosome 3.

Predicting Risk Factors for 30-Day Readmissions Following Discharge From Post-Acute Care

A Targeted Discharge Planning for High-Risk Readmissions: Focus on Patients and Caregivers

Understanding patient-centred readmission factors: a multi-site, mixed-methods study

Abstract WP28: Closing The Revolving Door: Reducing Stroke Readmissions

Causes and timing of 30-day rehospitalization from skilled nursing facilities after a hospital admission for pneumonia or sepsis

147-LB: Targeted Intervention for At-Risk Patients with Diabetes to Reduce Readmissions

Case Management in Prevention of 30-Day Readmission in Post-Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery

Prevalence and risk factors associated within 48-hour unplanned paediatric intensive care unit readmissions: An integrative review

Reducing 30-day Acute Care Readmissions for Heart Failure Patients Through Implementation of a Discharge Bundle

Qualitative Study Assessing Factors for 30-day Readmissions: A Head and Neck Oncology Cohort

Effect of Discharge Readiness on 30-Day Readmissions Among Older Adults Living With Multiple Chronic Conditions

Early Prediction of Unplanned 30-Day Hospital Readmission: Model Development and Retrospective Data Analysis

Causes and Predictors of Unplanned Readmission in Cranial Neurosurgery

Suction loss during femtosecond laser–assisted small‐incision lenticule extraction: Incidence and analysis of risk factors

Surgical rehospitalization of the medicare fee-for-service patient: a state-level analysis exploring 30-day readmission factors

Reasons for readmission after hospital discharge in patients with chronic diseases-Information from an international dataset

Decomposition of complete tripartite graphs into gregarious 4-cycles

Causes for 30‐day readmissions and accuracy of the LACE index in regional Victoria, Australia

Predictors and outcomes of unplanned readmission to a different hospital

Effects of Implementing a Health Team Communication Redesign on Hospital Readmissions Within 30 Days