A Systematic Review of Dementia Research Priorities
Manonita Ghosh,Pelden Chejor,Melanie Baker,Davina Porock
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/08919887241232647
2024-02-11
Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology
Abstract:Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology, Ahead of Print. IntroductionPatient involvement is a critical component of dementia research priority-setting exercises to ensure that research benefits are relevant and acceptable to those who need the most. This systematic review synthesises research priorities and preferences identified by people living with dementia and their caregivers.MethodsGuided by Joanna Briggs Institute methodology, and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses framework, we conducted a systematic search in five electronic databases: CINAHL, Medline, PsycINFO, Web of Science and Scopus. The reference lists of the included studies were also manually searched. We combined quantitative and qualitative data for synthesis and descriptive thematic analysis.ResultsEleven studies were included in this review. Findings are grouped into four main categories: Increase in knowledge, education, and awareness; Determining the cause; Sustainability of care; and Cure of dementia and related conditions.ConclusionThere is a need to respond to the stigma associated with dementia, which limits access to care and the quality of life for both people living with dementia and their caregivers. We need to work on changing public, private and workplace attitudes about dementia and encourage supporting and participating in dementia research. Future research should involve people living with dementia and their primary caregivers from culturally and linguistically diverse communities in priority-setting exercises.
psychiatry,clinical neurology,geriatrics & gerontology,gerontology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?