Abstract:Study Objective The objective of this study was to analyze the learning curves of laparoscopic single-site myomectomy (LESS-M) and to explore the influencing factors of operative time. Design Retrospective observational study. Setting University-based hospital. Single center. Patients or Participants 213 patients who underwent LESS-M by 5 surgeons with 15-25 years experiences of laparoscopic surgeries between March 2017 and November 2019. Interventions Laparoscopic single-site myomectomy (LESS-M). Measurements and Main Results Learning curves were obtained by cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis of operative time, estimated blood loss and postoperative hospital stay. Variables such as age, body mass index, characteristics of myomas, type of suture and suturing layers, adhesion conditions, whether to enter uterine cavity, concomitant surgeries and surgeon experiences were reviewed to study the influencing factors of operative time by linear regression model. Each surgeon performed 29-53 cases of LESS-M. CUSUM curves of all 5 surgeons showed multiple fluctuation instead of ideal increasing-plateau-decreasing trend. Number, size and location of the myomas, adhesion condition, type of suture and the surgeon experiences were the determining influencing factors of surgical time of LESS-M procedure (P<0.05). Conclusion LESS-M procedure can be quickly learned and performed by surgeons with more than 15 years experiences of laparoscopy. The characteristics of myomas, suture and surgeon experiences may influence the operative time of LESS-M. The objective of this study was to analyze the learning curves of laparoscopic single-site myomectomy (LESS-M) and to explore the influencing factors of operative time. Retrospective observational study. University-based hospital. Single center. 213 patients who underwent LESS-M by 5 surgeons with 15-25 years experiences of laparoscopic surgeries between March 2017 and November 2019. Laparoscopic single-site myomectomy (LESS-M). Learning curves were obtained by cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis of operative time, estimated blood loss and postoperative hospital stay. Variables such as age, body mass index, characteristics of myomas, type of suture and suturing layers, adhesion conditions, whether to enter uterine cavity, concomitant surgeries and surgeon experiences were reviewed to study the influencing factors of operative time by linear regression model. Each surgeon performed 29-53 cases of LESS-M. CUSUM curves of all 5 surgeons showed multiple fluctuation instead of ideal increasing-plateau-decreasing trend. Number, size and location of the myomas, adhesion condition, type of suture and the surgeon experiences were the determining influencing factors of surgical time of LESS-M procedure (P<0.05). LESS-M procedure can be quickly learned and performed by surgeons with more than 15 years experiences of laparoscopy. The characteristics of myomas, suture and surgeon experiences may influence the operative time of LESS-M.

Variables that prolong total operative time for robotic-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy: A 10-year tertiary hospital study in Korea

Single-Site Robotic Myomectomy without Accessory Instrument Compared with Two-Port Laparoscopic Myomectomy: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Myomectomy versus Abdominal Myomectomy for Large Myomas Sized over 10 cm or Weighing 250 g

[Influencing Factors of Reproduction Status of Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Myomectomy].

A comparative retrospective analysis on robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery compared to conventional laparoscopy in case of myomectomy: experience in a third-level hospital of Southern Italy

Robotic single-site versus multi-port myomectomy: a case-control study

Efficacy and safety of robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy versus laparoscopic myomectomy: a systematic evaluation and meta-analysis

A Single-Center Experience of 401 Cases

Comparison of postoperative pain in robotic and laparoscopic myomectomy: a retrospective cohort study

Coaxial Robotic Single-Site Myomectomy vs. Hybrid Robotic Single-Site Myomectomy

Analysis of Risk Factors for Intraoperative Conversion of Laparoscopic Myomectomy

Robotic‐assisted laparoscopic versus abdominal and laparoscopic myomectomy: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Feasibility and Perioperative Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Higher Order Myomectomy

Three-dimensional imaging reconstruction and laparoscopic robotic surgery: a winning combination for a complex case of multiple myomectomy

Learning Curves and Influencing Factors of Laparoscopic Single-Site Myomectomy (LESS-M)

Perioperative Predictors of Prolonged Length of Hospital Stay Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: a Retrospective Study from a Single Center in China

Single-Port Versus Reduced-Port (1 + 1) Robotic Myomectomy and Hysterectomy

Identifying key predictors for uterine manipulator use in robotic simple hysterectomy: a retrospective cohort analysis

Is It the Best Option? Robotic Surgery for Endometriosis

The Influence of Surgical Complexity and Center Experience on Postoperative Morbidity After Minimally Invasive Surgery in Gynecologic Oncology: Lessons Learned from the ROBOGYN-1004 Trial

Predictive Model of the Surgical Difficulty of Robot-Assisted Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer: A Multicenter, Retrospective Study