Whole doctor education

J. Bligh

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/J.1365-2923.2000.00681.X

2000-07-01

Medical Education

Abstract:`Benign neglect' is the term used recently by Arthur Kleinman from Harvard Medical School to describe the low priority given to patients suffering from depression and anxiety related conditions. He was speaking at a conference organized last October by the Sir Robert Mond Memorial Trust on behalf of Harvard Medical School and the World Health Organization. The conference addressed a variety of mental health problems and the economic implications of depression. A major new report issued by the Surgeon General of the United States reviewed 3000 academic studies in the US and found that `half of all Americans have a mental disorder at some time in their lives' and `one in ®ve experience a mental disorder in any given year'. Both the report and the conference point out the near-epidemic proportions of depressive illness, issues relating to stigma and con®dentiality, and a failure by doctors to fully recognize and treat depression. In England and Wales, depression affects 9á2% of women and 3á9% of men, numbers that are increasing annually. In addition, the cost of treatment may be only a quarter of the hidden costs incurred through long-term unemployment, absenteeism and the many consequences of substance abuse. These hidden costs indicate the breadth, depth and complexity of problems associated with the identi®cation and treatment of depression. Current thinking about medical practice endorses the incorporation of `patient-centred' attitudes. Doctors should take patients' ideas and expectations seriously; involve them in decisions about their health care; empower them to become responsible for their own health; and take greater responsibility for nonmedical aspects of patients' health problems. It is this last point with which doctors have the most dif®culty. All doctors have patients they classify as `dif®cult'. Up to 30% of patients seen by newly quali®ed doctors in the United States and one in six of British general practitioners, may experience dif®culties with such patients. Patients may be classed as hateful, `dirty work', heartsink, black holes and frequent care abusers, or described as obnoxious, belligerent or demanding. Doctors believe that some patients can and should be medically treated ± that their illness has a recognizable physiological basis. Other patients, such as chronic alcoholics and drug abusers, violent patients and victims of abuse are capable of evoking strong, unpleasant feelings and negative reactions in doctors. Complex medical problems, patients' behaviour in response to advice, or excessive and impossible demands, can add to the doctor's frustration. Con ̄icts and misunderstandings occur, and neither patient nor doctor is satis®ed with the outcome. Why is it dif®cult to diagnose and treat many of these patients? Both doctors and patients can inhibit recognition and treatment of mental health problems. Patients may be unable or unwilling to talk about personal or social problems, and may not accept or understand the links between their psychological distress and somatic symptoms, especially when they are masked by pain and discomfort resulting from other chronic ailments. Differences in culture, gender, social class or status may promulgate stereotypes and prejudices and become an invisible barrier to open or prolonged discussion. Doctors may feel that they do not have the knowledge, skills or time to deal with patients effectively, or that the personal problems of patients are none of their business. An unspoken agreement between them may cause both patient and doctor to ignore sensitive topics. This gloomy picture of the growth of mental illness and its repercussions is a timely reminder to assess the ways through which it is being addressed in medical education.