Development and Evaluation of Deep Learning-Accelerated Single-Breath-Hold Abdominal HASTE at 3 T Using Variable Refocusing Flip Angles

Judith Herrmann,Dominik Nickel,John P Mugler 3rd,Simon Arberet,Sebastian Gassenmaier,Saif Afat,Konstantin Nikolaou,Ahmed E Othman
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000000785
2021-10-01
Abstract:Objective: Deep learning (DL) reconstruction enables substantial acceleration of image acquisition while maintaining diagnostic image quality. The aims of this study were to overcome the drawback of specific absorption rate (SAR)-related limitations at 3 T and to develop a DL-accelerated single-breath-hold half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin echo (HASTE) sequence for 2-dimesional T2-weighted fat-suppressed magnetic resonance imaging of the abdomen at 3 T using a variable flip angle (FA) evolution for the refocusing radiofrequency pulses, as well as to evaluate its feasibility and image quality in comparison to state-of-the-art T2-weighted fat-suppressed imaging technique (BLADE). Materials and methods: First, a suitable FA evolution with low cardiac motion-related signal loss (CRSL) and low SAR was determined through a prospective volunteer study with 11 participants. Image quality and diagnostic confidence with 5 different FA evolutions of a HASTEDL were assessed to identify the most suitable FA evolution. Second, the identified FA evolution was implemented clinically and evaluated in 51 patients undergoing a clinically indicated liver magnetic resonance imaging at 3 T. Two radiologists assessed the HASTEDL and standard sequences regarding overall image quality, noise, contrast, sharpness, artifacts, CRSL, and diagnostic confidence using a Likert scale ranging from 1 to 4, with 4 being the best. Comparative analyses were conducted to assess the differences between HASTEDL (acquisition time, 21 seconds; single breath-hold) and the routinely used T2-weighted BLADE sequence (acquisition time, 4 minutes; respiratory triggering). Results: From the volunteer study, the FA evolution characterized by the control points 130-90-110-130 degrees (HASTEDL) was identified as optimal among the 5 evolutions evaluated and was implemented in our clinical protocol. In all 51 patients, HASTEDL was successfully acquired at 3 T and showed excellent image quality (median, 4; interquartile range, 3-4). Although BLADE was rated significantly higher for overall image quality, noise, contrast, sharpness, artifacts, CRSL, and diagnostic confidence than HASTEDL, no differences were found concerning the number (n = 102) and measured diameter of the detected hepatic lesions between the 2 sequences BLADE and HASTEDL. Conclusions: The proposed single-breath-hold abdominal HASTEDL with variable refocusing FAs is feasible at 3 T within SAR limits and yields high image quality and diagnostic confidence as compared with a standard T2-weighted acquisition technique, at a 10th of the acquisition time.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?