Optimizing prenatal diagnosis and referral of classic bladder exstrophy: Lessons from a single-institution experience
Alexander M. Hirsch,Christian C. Morrill,Ahmad Haffar,Thomas G.W. Harris,Chad Crigger,Angie C. Jelin,John P. Gearhart
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2024.02.014
IF: 1.921
2024-03-04
Journal of Pediatric Urology
Abstract:Summary Introduction Classic bladder exstrophy (CBE) is a malformation of the genitourinary system that occurs due to failure of abdominal wall closure. Unlike other malformations of similar incidence, prenatal diagnosis of CBE relies on suggested, rather than formal, diagnostic criteria. Objective This report describes prenatal diagnosis of CBE in the largest single-institutional cohort to date and delineates key sonographic findings and protocols for specialist referral. Materials and methods A single-institutional database was reviewed for CBE patients born since 2000. Data on screening ultrasound use, gestational age at ultrasound, and abnormal findings were extracted. Where possible, time of prenatal diagnosis (pre- or postnatal and gestational age), ultrasound findings and other imaging data, specialist referral, institution of birth and closure, and outcome of primary closure attempt were compared. Results Of 557 patients born with CBE between 2000 and 2022, 284 met inclusion criteria and complete data were available for 280 (229 born domestically and 51 born internationally) who were included for analysis. Abnormal sonography suggestive of CBE was present for 48% (n = 134) of patients, for whom absent bladder was the most common abnormal finding (76% [102/134]). Of domestic patients, 46% (n = 106) were diagnosed prenatally at a median gestational age of 22 weeks (inter-quartile range [IQR]: 20–24), and 14% (n = 32) underwent confirmatory fetal magnetic resonance imaging. Of domestic patients with abnormal prenatal findings, 75% (n = 80/106) consulted with maternal-fetal medicine and 58% (n = 62/106) consulted with pediatric urology. On univariate analysis, prenatal diagnosis was positively associated with primary repair at Association for the Bladder Exstrophy Community-recognized centers of excellence (54% vs. 38%, p = 0.02) and negatively associated with osteotomy at primary closure (41% vs 59%, p = 0.003) but not success of primary closure (74% vs. 82%, p = 0.07). Discussion Rates of prenatal diagnosis in this cohort were similar to previous reports of smaller cohorts. Diagnosis allows for comprehensive pre- and postnatal follow-up with a pediatric urologist, with implications on birth planning and decisions on termination of pregnancy. Because of the previously-reported association between exstrophy and in vitro fertilization, these pregnancies should undergo detailed sonography. Any nonvisualization of the fetal bladder should prompt a detailed exam, and any finding characteristic of bladder exstrophy warrants referral to pediatric urology. Conclusions Although CBE is a rare disorder, it is underdiagnosed during pregnancy. Sonographers and obstetricians should be aware of characteristic findings and best practices following diagnosis. Early referral to pediatric urology and maternal-fetal medicine is important for counseling and postnatal planning.
pediatrics,urology & nephrology