Abstract:Background: Deceptive movements occur when an actor seeks to fake, hide or delay kinematic information about their true movement outcomes. The purpose of deceptive movements is to impair the perception of opponents (the 'observer') to gain an advantage over them. We argue though that a lack of conceptual clarity has led to confusion about what deception is and in understanding the different approaches by which an actor can deceive their opponent. The aim of this article is to outline a conceptual framework for understanding deceptive movements in sport. Main body: Adopting Interpersonal Deception Theory from the field of communication, we define deception as when an actor deliberately alters their actions in an attempt to impair the ability of an observer to anticipate their true action outcomes. Further, deception can be achieved either by what we define as deceit, the act of providing false information, or disguise, the act of concealing the action outcome. Skilled athletes often have actions that are difficult to anticipate, but an action is only classified as containing deception if the actor has explicit intent to deceive an observer. Having outlined the conceptual framework, we then review existing empirical findings on the skilled perception of deceptive movements considering the framework. This approach includes a critical evaluation of the mechanisms known to facilitate the perceptual ability to prevent being deceived, including a consideration of visual search strategies, confidence, the contribution of visual and motor experiences, and the influence of response biases and action capabilities on perceptual performance. Conclusion: The distinction between deceit and disguise particularly helps to show that most research has examined deceit, with little known about how an actor can more effectively disguise their action, or about how an observer can improve their ability to anticipate the outcome of disguised actions. The insights help to identify fruitful areas for future research and outline implications for skill acquisition and performance enhancement.

Examining the Perceptual-Cognitive Mechanism of Deceptive Actions in Sports

Context-specific adaptation for head fakes in basketball: a study on player-specific fake-frequency schedules

Expertise and Deceptive Movements in Sport

Shot deception in basketball: Gaze and anticipation strategy in defence

Avoiding Repetitive Mistakes: Understanding Post-Error Adjustment in Response to Head Fake Actions

Skilled deceivers are better action perceivers and vice versa

Expert anticipation from deceptive action

The role of the peripheral target in stimulating eye movements

Stepovers and Signal Detection: Response Sensitivity and Bias in the Differentiation of Genuine and Deceptive Football Actions

Varying Degrees of Perception-Action Coupling and Anticipation in Handball Goalkeeping

You can't con a conman: the perception of deceptive actions performed by the self and others

Gender difference in spontaneous deception: A hyperscanning study using functional near-infrared spectroscopy

Discovery learning in sports: Implicit or explicit processes?

Brain Activation and Adaptation of Deception Processing During Dyadic Face-to-face Interaction.

The Cognitive Processes Related to Deceptive Responding

Cortical oscillations and event‐related brain potentials during the preparation and execution of deceptive behavior

Shot fakes as an indicator of successful offense in basketball

The Defender's Vision-Gaze Behavior of One-on-One Defenders in Basketball

Mental Rotation of Tactical Instruction Displays Affects Information Processing Demand and Execution Accuracy in Basketball

The role of peripheral vision during decision-making in dynamic viewing sequences

The Processes Leading to Deception: ERP Spatiotemporal Principal Component Analysis and Source Analysis