Abstract:Medical PhysicsVolume 37, Issue 6Part27 p. 3435-3436 Fifty-second annual meeting of the american association of physicists in medicine WE-E-BRA-02: Clinical Evaluation of Fixed-Field IMRT Plans and IMAT Plans in Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer H Zhang, H Zhang University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MDSearch for more papers by this authorR Meyer, R Meyer University of Wisconsin, Madison, WISearch for more papers by this authorS Naqvi, S Naqvi University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MDSearch for more papers by this authorL Shi, L Shi University of Wisconsin, Madison, WISearch for more papers by this authorW D'Souza, W D'Souza University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MDSearch for more papers by this author H Zhang, H Zhang University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MDSearch for more papers by this authorR Meyer, R Meyer University of Wisconsin, Madison, WISearch for more papers by this authorS Naqvi, S Naqvi University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MDSearch for more papers by this authorL Shi, L Shi University of Wisconsin, Madison, WISearch for more papers by this authorW D'Souza, W D'Souza University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MDSearch for more papers by this author First published: 02 June 2010 https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3469424About ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat Abstract Purpose: To evaluate the treatment plan quality and delivery efficiency of fixed-field IMRT and IMAT in locally advanced head and neck cancer cases. Method and Materials: Ten locally advanced head and neck cases were included. For each case, the treatment targets involve primary tumor, positive lymph node(s), high risk and low risk nodal volumes. Organs-at-risk included both parotids and spinal cord. Seven-beam IMRT plans were generated using the Pinnacle3 planning system and an in-house developed sequential linear program (SLP) optimization approach. The SLP approach solved the corresponding dose optimization problem by dividing the problem into sub-problems, each of which was solved using LP while maintaining a global view of the full problem. Single-arc and double-arc IMAT plans with 180 and 360 total apertures, respectively were generated using Pinnacle SmartArc 9.0. Plan quality was compared with DVHs and quantitative dose-volume measures and delivery efficiency was compared with MUs and aperture number. Results: Single-arc plans did not provide enough coverage for all three targets. Two-arc plans improved the plan quality compared to single-arc plans. Conventional fixed-field IMRT and SLP plans resulted in better plan quality than IMAT plans with SLP plans outperforming the other approaches. Improvements in parotid dose-volume levels and maximum cord dose were 12% and 90% when SLP was compared to two-arc plans. Approximately 160 to 230 apertures were used with conventional IMRT plans. SLP used fewer apertures than conventional IMRT but used more monitor units. Double-arc plan used more monitor units than the single-arc plan. Overall, IMAT plans used fewer MUs than IMRT plans. Conclusion: Our results indicate that (1) fixed-field IMRT plans (particularly the ones optimized using the SLP approach) result in superior dosimetric quality compared with IMAT and (2) IMAT plans result in greater delivery efficiency compared with IMRT. Conflict of Interest: NIH grant CA130814 Volume37, Issue6Part27June 2010Pages 3435-3436 RelatedInformation

Impact of field number and beam angle on ERE for lung stereotactic body radiotherapy with 1.5T MR-Linac

Volumetric and Dosimetric Variations in Radiation Treatment Planning Using CT Images Based on Different Reconstructed Field-of-view

A dosimetric comparison of the tangential beams IMRT with multifield beams IMRT of the chest wall in postmastectomy breast cancer recurrent patients

MO-D-BRB-09: Inverse Beam Angle Optimization in IMRT for Lung Cancer Patients

MRI-based IMRT planning for MR-linac: comparison between CT- and MRI-based plans for pancreatic and prostate cancers

Evaluation Of The Dosimetric Impact Of Interfractional Anatomical Variations On Prostate Proton Therapy Using Daily In-Room Ct Images

A data-driven approach to optimal beam/arc angle selection for liver stereotactic body radiation therapy treatment planning

SU-E-T-713: Study On Application of Beam Angle Optimization for Multiple Intracranial Metastases

Impact of 1.5 T Magnetic Field on Treatment Plan Quality in MR-Guided Radiotherapy: Typical Phantom Test Cases

Dose differences in intensity-modulated radiotherapy plans calculated with pencil beam and Monte Carlo for lung SBRT

Assessing the Impact of a 1.5 T Transverse Magnetic Field in Radiotherapy for Esophageal Cancer Patients

Impact of Different Beam Set-Up Methods on Quality of Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy in Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer

SU-FF-T-591: Improvement of IMRT Plan Quality with Non-Isocentric Beam Arrangement for Head and Neck Cancers

SU-E-T-564: Radiation Therapy for Lung Cancer: A Treatment Planning Comparison among Fixed Field IMRT, Coplanar and Noncoplanar Arcs Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy

Improved Beam Angle Arrangement In Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy Treatment Planning For Localized Prostate Cancer

Quantification of Dosimetry Improvement With or Without Patient Surface Guidance

SU‐E‐T‐358: Dosimetric Effects of Beam Angle Arrangements in Lung Proton Therapy

SU‐E‐T‐323: Dosimetric Evaluation of Small Fields for SBRT Treatment

Lung SBRT Treatment Planning: a Study of VMAT Arc Selection Guided by Collision Check Software.

WE-E-BRA-02: Clinical Evaluation of Fixed-Field IMRT Plans and IMAT Plans in Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer

Dosimetric Accuracy of MR-Guided Online Adaptive Planning for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Radiotherapy on 1.5 T MR-Linac