Visual complications after coil embolization of internal carotid artery aneurysms at the ophthalmic segment

Shotaro Michishita,Toshihiro Ishibashi,Ichiro Yuki,Mitsuyoshi Urashima,Kostadin Karagiozov,Tomonobu Kodama,Issei Kan,Kengo Nishimura,Naoki Kato,Ayako Ikemura,Yuichi Murayama
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1591019921996886
Abstract:Background: Coil embolization of aneurysms of the ophthalmic segment of the internal carotid artery (ICA-OphA ANs) has potential risks of visual complications. We analyzed this risk and focused on the relationship of the ophthalmic artery (OphA) origin with the aneurysm neck. Methods: From January 2003 to April 2018, 179 unruptured ICA-OphA ANs were treated with endovascular surgery in our institution. Two ruptured and four aneurysms with missing data were excluded. Finally, 173 unruptured aneurysms were included in this study. The aneurysms were classified into three groups according to the location of the OphA origin: Separate, Shared, and Dome type. We retrospectively assessed visual complications based on the relationship between types of aneurysm and postoperative angiographic findings for the OphA. Results: Visual deficits remained permanent in eleven cases (6.4%). In the Dome type, visual complications were significantly more frequent compared to the Separate type. Change in the OphA flow was significantly associated with a higher complication rate of 2.9%, but patients with changed OphA flow had a significant rate of 7.5% (p = 0.020). We found no significant difference in the incidence of visual complications concerning the use of perioperative antithrombotic therapy. Conclusions: The location of OphA origin regarding the aneurysmal neck and postoperative OphA flow were significantly correlated with the visual outcome after coil embolization for ICA-OphA ANs. Post-procedural flow in the OphA was an important factor affecting the rate of ischemic retinal complications. Retinal embolic events occurred with preserved flow in the OphA, albeit at a lower rate.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?