Abstract:Fairness plays a crucial role in children's social life and has garnered considerable attention. However, previous research and theories primarily examined the development of children's fairness behaviors in the conflict between self-interest motivation and fairness-complying motivation, neglecting the influence of advantage-seeking motivation. Moreover, despite the well-established role of gain/loss frame in human decision-making, it remains largely unclear whether the framing effect modulates fairness behaviors in children. It was hypothesized that children would exhibit advantage-seeking motivation resulting in more selfish behaviors in the loss context. To examine the hypothesis, we combined an adapted dictator game and computational modeling to investigate various motivations underlying fairness behaviors of children in both loss and gain contexts and to explore the developmental directions by contrasting children and adults. In addition, the current design enabled the dissociation between fairness knowledge and behaviors by asking participants to decide for themselves (the first-party role) or for others (the third-party role). This study recruited a total of 34 children (9–10 years, M age = 9.82, SD age = 0.38, 16 females) and 31 college students ( M age = 19.81, SD age = 1.40, 17 females). The behavioral results indicated that children behaved more selfishly in first-party and more fairly in third-party than adults, without any significant framing effects. The computational results revealed that both children and adults exhibited aversion to advantageous and disadvantageous inequity in third-party. However, they showed distinct preferences for advantageous inequity in first-party, with advantage-seeking preferences among children and aversion to advantageous inequity among adults. These findings contribute to a deeper understanding of children's social preferences and their developmental directions.

Benign and malicious envy and its effects on cooperation in Chinese children

Cooperation and Charity in Spatial Public Goods Game under Different Strategy Update Rules

Social Dominance Orientation and Selfish Behaviors in Chinese Adolescents: the Mediating Role of Psychological Entitlement

Cooperation, but Not Competition, Improves 4-Year-old Children's Reasoning about Others' Diverse Desires.

Influence of Group Identification on Malicious and Benign Envy: A Cross-Sectional Developmental Study

The development of cooperation and cooperative norm enforcement in children and adolescents: The role of in-group favoritism

Subjective socioeconomic status and envy in Chinese collectivist culture: The role of sense of control

Validating the "Two Faces" of Envy: The Effect of Self-Control

Effects of coordination and gender on prosocial behavior in 4-year-old Chinese children

The effect of different types of social norms on children's sharing behavior: The roles of parents, teachers, and peers

Distributive fairness during the transition to adolescence: The role of peer comparison and social value orientation

Common and distinct equity preferences in children and adults

How does benign/malicious envy impact young women's subjective well-being in daily life? An investigation of intrapersonal and interpersonal pathway.

A COOPERATIVE GAME WITH ENVY

Bidirectional relations between altruistic tendency and benign/malicious envy among adolescents: A longitudinal study and weekly diary study

Developmental patterns and computational mechanisms of school-aged children's fairness-related decision making under social comparison

Children Sustain Cooperation in a Threshold Public-Goods Game Even When Seeing Others' Outcomes

Effects of victim justice sensitivity on envy: The role of upward social comparison and perceived control

The Associations between Perceived Parenting Styles, Empathy, and Altruistic Choices in Economic Games: A Study of Chinese Children

"Favoring my playmate seems fair": Inhibitory control and theory of mind in preschoolers' self-disadvantaging behaviors

Chinese Preschoolers' Resource Allocation in the Face of Existing Inequality under Collaborative and Noncollaborative Contexts