Abstract:Background Patients with heart failure undergoing CRT are an heterogenous and complex population. Selecting patients before implantation is essential to obtain a favorable response to CRT-D. Data-driven cluster analysis may be an approach to identify different patients' phenotypic categories. Purpose To identify different clusters of patients with CRT-D who share similar clinical phenotypes, and to evaluate the associations between clusters and clinical outcomes, using cluster analysis. Methods Three agglomerative hierarchical cluster analysis were performed in CRT-D patients seen between 2010 and 2019 in French hospitals. Associations between clusters and death at one year and death during whole follow-up (FU) were evaluated using Cox regression analyses. Results The study included 23,029 CRT-D patients with no prior history of VT/VF/cardiac arrest (mean age 67.7 ± 9.9 years; 78.8 % male), who were analyzed in relation to 3 ways, as follows: the first group was a 50% random sample of all patients (n = 11,514), the second group included patients dead at 1 year (n = 1,604) and the third group included those alive at 3 years FU (n = 14,228). A cluster analysis was performed on each group. Four clusters were identified in the first group: Cluster 1 identified young patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and low prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD), cardiovascular (CV) risk factors and comorbidities (chronic kidney disease, lung and liver disease) (low-risk phenotype); Cluster 2 was composed of male patients with CAD but low burden of CV risk factors and comorbidities (CAD phenotype); Cluster 3 included CRT recipients with several CV risk factors but low prevalence of comorbidities (CV risk factors phenotype); Cluster 4 identified old patients with high prevalence of CAD, atrial fibrillation, CV risk factors and comorbidities (clinical complex phenotype). These phenotypes were maintained in the other two groups (dead at 1 year and alive at 3 years FU), with the highest consistency for low-risk and high-risk phenotypes(Cluster 1 and 4 respectively). Compared with Cluster 1, Clusters 2, 3 and 4 were independently associated with an increased risk of all-cause death at 1-year FU and during the whole FU (Cluster 2: HR 1.21, 95% CI 1.08 - 1.36; Cluster 3: HR 1.15, 95%CI 1.04 - 1.26; and Cluster 4: HR 1.79, 95%CI 1.65 - 1.96). There were high prevalences of CAD, atrial fibrillation, mitral regurgitation, and comorbidities (which are all predictors of CRT-nonresponse) not only in Cluster 4 at baseline, but also among patients who died at 1-year FU in all 4 clusters. Conclusion Cluster analysis identified four statistically driven groups of CRT recipients, with specific clinical phenotypes and associated with different risks for all-cause death. Identifying those patients at higher risk of adverse events might help in the selection of patients with heart failure undergoing CRT-D implantation, especially in relation to CRT-nonresponse.Risk of all-cause death in 4 clusters

Perpetration, Revictimization, and Self-Injury: Traumatic Reenactments of Child Sexual Abuse in a Nonclinical Sample of South African Adolescents

Predictors for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Response

[Factors Associated with the Efficacy of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure].

Clinical phenotypes in relation to outcomes in heart failure patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy and defibrillators (CRT-D): an unsupervised cluster analysis

The Mosaic of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Responders—A Comprehensive Exploration of Diverse Criteria and Predictors

Regional Left Ventricular Fiber Stress Analysis for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Response

Understanding Nonresponders of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy—Current and Future Perspectives

CMR Feature Tracking-Based Left Atrial Mechanics Predicts Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy and Adverse Outcomes.

Machine learning of ECG waveforms and cardiac magnetic resonance for response and survival after cardiac resynchronization therapy

Interplay between strain pattern-based classification of dyssynchrony and myocardial scar in CRT patients

Changes in Global Left Ventricular Function by Multidirectional Strain Assessment in Heart Failure Patients Undergoing Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Circulating metabolite profiles to predict response to cardiac resynchronization therapy

Electro-echocardiographic Indices to Predict Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Non-response on Non-ischemic Cardiomyopathy

Genetic connectivity and diversity of walleye (Sander vitreus) spawning groups in the Huron–Erie Corridor

The Value of Left Ventricular Strain–volume Loops in Predicting Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Heart Rate Recovery Index and Improved Diastolic Dyssynchrony in Fusion Pacing Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Guided Left Ventricular Lead Implantation to Improve the Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy:Rationale and Design

The role of fibrosis and inflammation for response and outcome prediction in candidates to cardiac resynchronization therapy: is response the right answer?

Investigating the clinical utility of global and regional myocardial work parameters in predicting response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction

Personalized Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Guided by Real-time Electrocardiographic Imaging for Non-Left Bundle Branch Block patients

Application of Machine Learning in Early Recommendation of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy