Abstract:Vibrotactile stimuli can be effective as warning signals, but their effectiveness as directional take-over requests in automated driving is yet unknown. This study aimed to investigate the correct response rate, reaction times, and eye and head orientation for static versus dynamic directional take-over requests presented via vibrating motors in the driver seat. In a driving simulator, eighteen participants performed three sessions: 1) a session involving no driving (Baseline), 2) driving a highly automated car without additional task (HAD), and 3) driving a highly automated car while performing a mentally demanding task (N-Back). Per session, participants received four directional static (in the left or right part of the seat) and four dynamic (moving from one side towards the opposite left or right of the seat) take-over requests via two 6×4 motor matrices embedded in the seat back and bottom. In the Baseline condition, participants reported whether the cue was left or right, and in the HAD and N-Back conditions participants had to change lanes to the left or to the right according to the directional cue. The correct response rate was operationalized as the accuracy of the self-reported direction (Baseline session) and the accuracy of the lane change direction (HAD & N-Back sessions). The results showed that the correct response rate ranged between 94% for static patterns in the Baseline session and 74% for dynamic patterns in the N-Back session, although these effects were not statistically significant. Steering wheel touch and steering input reaction times were approximately 200ms faster for static patterns than for dynamic ones. Eye tracking results revealed a correspondence between head/eye-gaze direction and lane change direction, and showed that head and eye-gaze movements where initiated faster for static vibrations than for dynamic ones. In conclusion, vibrotactile stimuli presented via the driver seat are effective as warnings, but their effectiveness as directional take-over requests may be limited. The present study may encourage further investigation into how to get drivers safely back into the loop.

Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research

Can Wearable Devices Facilitate a Driver’s Brake Response Time in a Classic Car-Following Task?

In-Vehicle Human Machine Interface: Investigating the Effects of Tactile Displays on Information Presentation in Automated Vehicles

Effect of Driving Experience on Collision Avoidance Braking: an Experimental Investigation and Computational Modelling

Vibration warning design for reaction time reduction under the environment of intelligent connected vehicles

The comparison of auditory, tactile, and multimodal warnings for the effective communication of unexpected events during an automated driving scenario

VTD: Visual and Tactile Database for Driver State and Behavior Perception

Effects of Instructional Vibrotactile Patterns on Takeover Performance in Autonomous Driving

The Effects Of Vibration Patterns Of Take-Over Request And Non-Driving Tasks On Taking-Over Control Of Automated Vehicles

Multimodal Warnings Design for In-Vehicle Robots under Driving Safety Scenarios

Influence of Pedestrian Collision Warning Systems on Driver Behavior: A Driving Simulator Study

Effectiveness Assessment of Human-Machine Interface in Driver Assistance System

A Method for Vehicle Collision Risk Assessment through Inferring Driver's Braking Actions in Near-Crash Situations

Exploring the effects of vibratile takeover request in autonomous driving across various locations

Driver operational level identification of driving risk and graded time-based alarm under near-crash conditions: A driving simulator study

Vibrotactile Displays: A Survey With a View on Highly Automated Driving

Designing an Experimental Platform to Assess Ergonomic Factors and Distraction Index in Law Enforcement Vehicles during Mission-Based Routes

Driver distraction and in-vehicle interventions: A driving simulator study on visual attention and driving performance

Advanced Audio-Visual Multimodal Warnings for Drivers: Effect of Specificity and Lead Time on Effectiveness

Evaluation of Multimodal and Multi-Staged Alerting Strategies for Forward Collision Warning Systems

Comparing spatially static and dynamic vibrotactile take-over requests in the driver seat