0153 Look Before Leaping: Relationship Between Circadian Preference, Sleep Quality, Fatigue, and Injury Risk in Soldiers
Erin Paulus,Hannah Eldringhoff,Kathleen Huang,Sidhartha Chaudhury,Janna Mantua,Rachell Jones
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsae067.0153
IF: 6.313
2024-04-20
SLEEP
Abstract:Abstract Introduction In a previous study, we found that morning circadian preference and increased fatigue were associated with increased injuries during a nocturnal parachute jump. The purpose of the present study was to replicate this finding, and expand upon it by determining whether, and the extent to which, subjective sleep ratings are also predictive of injury during parachute jumps. Methods Participants included 27 male active duty Soldiers aged 23.7 ± 2.9 years (M ± SD). Participants completed a series of questionnaires at baseline (1 week prior to jump), pre-jump (1 hour before), and post-jump (1 hour after). Questionnaires about sleep; insomnia symptoms; circadian preference (morning vs. evening); injuries; and subjective experiences of sleepiness, fatigue, and jump quality were administered. Results Circadian preference was correlated with ‘sleep quality over the previous month’ (r = -.537, p < .01) and week (r = -.502, p < .01) with those indicating evening preference reporting poorer sleep quality. There was no correlation between circadian preference and average total sleep time. No participants had Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) scores above the clinical threshold for insomnia. However, those indicating an evening circadian preference had higher ISI scores (r = .635, p < 0.001). No significant correlations between circadian preference and previous jump injuries, subjective ratings of parachute landing fall (PLF) quality, or landing hardness were found. Likewise, momentary sleepiness and subjective fatigue were not significantly correlated with PLF or landing hardness. Conclusion In this sample of young Soldiers, evening circadian preference was associated with poorer subjective sleep quality and more insomnia-related symptoms. However, neither circadian preference nor fatigue level was significantly correlated with number of previous jump injuries or subjective ratings of jump performance. Given the small sample size and the generally high skill level of the population of parachutists, it is possible that the present n was not sufficient to detect an effect of circadian preference on injuries or jump quality. In future studies, objective measures of sleep should be added, the n should be increased, and the subject sample should include parachutists with a broader range of experience and training. Support (if any) Department of Defense Military Operational Medicine Research Program (MOMRP)
neurosciences,clinical neurology