Abstract:Introduction Hemophilia A is a rare X-linked bleeding disorder characterized by deficiency of the coagulation factor VIII (FVIII). The standard-of-care for hemophilia A includes prophylaxis (PPX) with factor replacement therapy or emicizumab to prevent bleeding. The World Federation of Hemophilia guidelines suggest FVIII trough levels of >3-5% or higher are adequate for PPX. While the importance of maintaining high FVIII levels is well recognized, real-world levels in patients with hemophilia A are often sub-optimal. Aim To understand unmet needs in patients with moderate or severe hemophilia A by assessing bleeding outcomes and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Methods Patients from the United States (US) were recruited by PicnicHealth, a patient-centric data retrieval platform working with individuals who contribute their medical record data to research across various disease areas. Patients consented for PicnicHealth to retrieve their medical records from all care sites or providers and receive access to their records in the US. Patients were invited to complete bleed, treatment, and quality of life surveys. The analysis included medical record data (2015-2022) and PRO survey data (2022) from patients with moderate or severe hemophilia A (endogenous factor level ≤5%). Three cohorts were defined for the analysis of bleed outcomes, based on patients' PPX product class exposure (standard half-life [SHL] factor, extended half-life [EHL] factor, and emicizumab). Index date was defined as the first observed PPX product use within the class beginning on or after January 1, 2015, and patients were censored at the earliest of switch to another product class, end of patient data, death, or data cut-off (October 3, 2022). Patients who switched product classes during the study period were included in multiple cohorts. The PRO instrument used was the 29-item, 7-domain PROMIS-29 questionnaire (range 1-5; scale scores standardized to a general US adult population with mean [SD] score of 50 [10]). A custom instrument designed to assess patients' “worst pain intensity” was also used (from 0 = no pain to 10 = worst imaginable pain). An additional Medication and Bleed Survey was administered biweekly to collect patient-reported treatment and bleed event information. Results Of the 354 patients recruited, 293 had moderate or severe hemophilia A, of which 291 patients had a record of treatment. After excluding patients with inhibitors on index date or a non-hemophilia A bleeding disorder diagnosis on or prior to index date, 141 patients met the criteria for SHL, 88 for EHL, and 82 for emicizumab PPX cohorts (non-exclusive). Patients' mean (SD) age in years at index were as follows: SHL, 26.7 (13.3); EHL, 26.2 (11.8); and emicizumab, 29.8 (14.9). Considering only individual bleed events documented in medical records, 57.3% of the SHL cohort, 47.1% of the EHL cohort, and 55.2% of the emicizumab cohort had at least one recorded bleed within the first year post-index date. When also including bleed rates reported to the provider by the patient (for more complete data capture from the medical record) the respective values were 61.4%, 70.8% and 62.1%. Out of 293 patients with moderate or severe hemophilia A, the PROMIS-29 questionnaire was completed by 142 patients who were ≥18 years of age at the time of survey completion. Scores were similar across patients' self-reported treatment class at the time of survey ( Table). Physical functioning and ability to participate in social roles and activities were the most affected areas; the most frequently reported symptoms were sleep disturbance (84.5%) and inability to participate in social roles and activities (69.7%). Adult patients completing the custom survey (n=140/293) rated their worst pain intensity as a mean (SD) of 7.7 (2.1); in patients with a recent bleed, this was 8.4 (1.5). Overall, patients reporting a recent bleed had worse scores. Conclusion This real-word study provides insights into the unmet needs in patients with hemophilia A receiving regular PPX. Irrespective of treatment received, a majority of patients still bleed at least once a year, struggle with pain and participating in social roles and activities, and have sleep disturbances. This indicates a need for improvement in the quality of life of this population and further highlights the need for understanding the patient perspective with hemophilia A.

Quality of electronic treatment records and adherence to prophylaxis in haemophilia and von Willebrand disease: Systematic assessments from an electronic diary

The haemtrack home therapy reporting system: Design, implementation, strengths and weaknesses: A report from UK Haemophilia Centre Doctors Organisation

PRO53 CLOTTING FACTOR UTILIZATION AND BLEEDING RATES AMONG PERSONS WITH HEMOPHILIA A FROM A LONGITUDINAL STUDY

Characteristics Associated with Annual Bleeding Frequency among Hemophilia Patients in the United States

Quality of Life in Haemophilia A: Hemophilia Utilization Group Study Va (Hugs-Va)

Adherence and Quality of Life in Adult Patients With Haemophilia A, Haemophilia B and Von Willebrand Disease: A National Cross‐Sectional Survey

Changes in Quality of Life, Adherence, and Kinesiophobia in Patients with Hemophilia Treated with Extended Half-Life Treatment: Final Results of the LongHest Project

Association between reported medication adherence and health-related quality of life in adult patients with haemophilia

Patient reported experience and adherence to remote patient management in chronic heart failure patients: a posthoc analysis of the TIM-HF2 trial

Physical Activity, Bleedings and Quality of Life in Subjects with Haemophilia A without Inhibitors—A Multicenter, Observational Italian Study with a Wearable Device

Mental, emotional and social dimensions of quality of life and their relationship with physical and functional status in adults with haemophilia

The Implementation of an Electronic Medical Record in a German Hospital and the Change in Completeness of Documentation: Longitudinal Document Analysis

Benefits of physical activity self‐monitoring in patients with haemophilia: a prospective study with one‐year follow‐up

Impact of Adopting Population Pharmacokinetics for Tailoring Prophylaxis in Haemophilia A Patients: A Historically Controlled Observational Study

Disease and treatment burden of patients with haemophilia entering the explorer6 non‐interventional study

Pharmacokinetics and complementary evaluation system-based guidance on prophylaxis of paediatric patients with haemophilia A in China with Kovaltry: protocol of the LEAP study

The effectiveness and safety of octocog alfa in patients with hemophilia A: up to 7-year follow-up of the real-world AHEAD international study

Disease Burden, Clinical Outcomes, and Quality of Life in People with Hemophilia A without Inhibitors in Europe: Analyses from CHESS II/CHESS PAEDs

Defining success in haemophilia care – Are we doing it right?

Real-World Unmet Needs in Patients with Hemophilia A without Inhibitors in the US: Results from the PicnicHealth Database

Physical therapy and imaging outcome measures in a haemophilia population treated with factor prophylaxis: current status and future directions