Disease and treatment burden of patients with haemophilia entering the explorer6 non‐interventional study

Jerzy Windyga,Shashikant Apte,Melissa Frei‐Jones,Teruhisa Fujii,Chuhl Joo Lyu,Laura Villarreal Martinez,Jameela Sathar,Oleksandra Stasyshyn,Huyen Tran,Nadezhda Zozulya,Renée Brown Frandsen,Jesper Skov Neergaard,Jay Jay Thaung Zaw,Johnny Mahlangu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ejh.14277
2024-07-20
European Journal Of Haematology
Abstract:Objectives We aimed to characterise baseline disease and treatment burden in a large population with haemophilia A/B, both with (HAwI/HBwI) and without (HA/HB) inhibitors. Methods The prospective, non‐interventional explorer6 study included patients ≥12 years old with severe HA, severe/moderate HB or HAwI/HBwI of any severity, treated according to local standard of care (excluding previous/current exposure to concizumab or emicizumab). Baseline characteristics and historical clinical data were collected and patient‐reported outcomes, including treatment burden, were assessed. Results The explorer6 study enrolled 231 patients with haemophilia (84 HAwI/HBwI) from 33 countries. At baseline, patients with HA/HB treated with prophylaxis had the lowest median annualised bleeding rates (ABRs; 2.0), irrespective of haemophilia type; of these patients, 27.5% (HA) and 31.4% (HB) had target joints. Patients with HAwI/HBwI treated episodically reported the highest treatment burden. Of these patients, 28.5% (HAwI) and 25.1% (HBwI) performed sports activities in the month before screening. Conclusion Despite receiving routine clinical care, historical and baseline information from patients enrolled in explorer6 showed that patients with HA/HB treated episodically and patients with HAwI/HBwI had higher ABRs, higher treatment burden and participated in sports less than those with HA/HB treated with prophylaxis. Emerging treatments could be beneficial in addressing these unmet medical needs.
hematology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?