Prediction of pre‐eclampsia: review of reviews
Rosemary Townsend, Asma Khalil, Yaamini Premakumar, John Allotey, Kym IE Snell, Claire Chan, Lucy C Chappell, Richard Hooper, Marcus Green, Ben W Mol, Basky Thilaganathan, Shakila Thangaratinam, IPPIC Network, J Allotey, K Snell, C Chan, R Hopper, J Dodds, E Rogozinska, K Khan, L Poston, L Kenny, J Myers, B Thilaganathan, L Chappell, BW Mol, P Von Dadelszen, A Ahmed, M Green, A Khalil, K Moons, RD Riley, S Thangaratinam
2019-07-01
Abstract:Objective Primary studies and systematic reviews provide estimates of varying accuracy for different factors in the prediction of pre‐eclampsia. The aim of this study was to review published systematic reviews to collate evidence on the ability of available tests to predict pre‐eclampsia, to identify high‐value avenues for future research and to minimize future research waste in this field. Methods MEDLINE, EMBASE and The Cochrane Library including DARE (Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects) databases, from database inception to March 2017, and bibliographies of relevant articles were searched, without language restrictions, for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses on the prediction of pre‐eclampsia. The quality of the included reviews was assessed using the AMSTAR tool and a modified version of the QUIPS tool. We evaluated the comprehensiveness of search, sample size, tests and outcomes …