Abstract:In this study we trialled a novel paradigm that aims to bridge the gap between the research into the extinction of conditioned responses and the instructed regulation of emotion via a prescribed strategy. This was done through a process we called Selective Extinction through Cognitive Evaluation (SECE). Participants were conditioned to associate a previously neutral stimulus (letter, CS+) with an aversive burst of white noise (US) and another letter with no aversive event (CS-). In a second phase, the same letters were presented within words belonging to two distinct categories. One group did not receive any more noise bursts during this phase which lead to the extinction of the conditioned responses (extinction group). The other group (SECE group) was told that the CS+ now only carried a risk of the noise occurring when it was presented in one (dangerous), but not the other word category (safe). Affective responses were assessed using skin conductance responses (SCR). We found overall increased SCR’s in response to CS+ (safe and dangerous) compared to CS- trials in the SECE group, and also increased SCR’s in response to dangerous compared to safe CS+ trials. This suggests that the conditioned response (CR) can be reduced through the cognitive evaluation of additional information and it is possible that extinction mechanisms are involved in this process. We did not find any effects in the extinction group. It is possible that extinction was completed too quickly so that any differences between conditions could not be captured. We therefore conducted a second study to pilot an improved paradigm. We visually amended the trials, amended the reinforcement schedule, and changed to a fully within-subjects design. Here we once again found significantly reduced SCR to safe compared to dangerous CS+ trials. Future experiments will use these results as a basis for an improved paradigm to better capture changes in SCR as well as BOLD fMRI in future experiments.

Inducing select/reject control in a matching‐to‐sample procedure with observing response: Effects on stimulus equivalence

Using a Respondent-Type Matching-to-Sample Exclusion Training Procedure to Establish Equivalence Responding

Reinforcer control by comparison-stimulus color and location in a delayed matching-to-sample task

Assessing negative reinforcement through simultaneous observing and committed concurrent progressive‐ratio procedures: Preliminary investigations

FUNCTIONAL CLASSES AND EQUIVALENCE RELATIONS

Influence of reinforcement and its omission on trial‐by‐trial changes of response bias in perceptual decision making

Test performance in optional shift and configural acquired equivalence are positively correlated.

The Automatic and the Expected Self: Separating Self- and Familiarity Biases Effects by Manipulating Stimulus Probability.

Functional dissociations versus post-hoc selection: Moving beyond the Stockart et al. (2024) compromise

Do uncontrolled processes contribute to evaluative learning? Insights from a new two-US process dissociation procedure and ambivalence measures

Observation: Three reasons to avoid having half of the trials be congruent in a four-alternative forced-choice experiment on sequential modulation

Correspondence Between Vocal-Verbal Behavior and Go/No-Go Responses During the Successive Matching-to-Sample Procedure

Between-task transfer of item-specific control is replicable and extends to novel conditions.

Criterion shifting in an unfamiliar face-matching task: Effects of base rates, payoffs, and perceptual discriminability.

Examining Procedural Variations of Delivering Competing Stimuli in the Treatment of Stereotypy

A further test of sequential-sampling models that account for payoff effects on response bias in perceptual decision tasks

Discriminative proprieties of Vary and Repeat contingencies

Attentional adjustment in priming tasks: control strategies depend on context

Avoidance Extinction in Equivalence Classes

Development of a Selective Extinction through Cognitive Evaluation Paradigm

Cognitive control controls the effect of irrelevant stimulus-response learning