CoopIS 2013 PC Co-Chairs Message

Johann Eder,Zohra Bellahsene,Rania Y. Khalaf

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41030-7_1

2013-09-09

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Risk Factors for Declines in Kidney Function in Sugarcane Workers in Guatemala

J. Butler-Dawson,L. Krisher,C. Asensio,Alex Cruz,Liliana Tenney,D. Weitzenkamp,M. Dally,E. Asturias,L. Newman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000001284

2018-01-25

Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine

Abstract:Objectives: To characterize kidney function of sugarcane workers in Guatemala over the 6-month harvest and identify risk factors associated with changes in kidney function. Methods: Demographic and biological data were collected for 330 sugarcane cutters at the beginning and end of the harvest. Multivariable regression analyses were used to assess factors related to kidney function. Results: A decline in kidney function across the harvest was observed in 36% of the participants. Risk factors associated with this decline included working at a particular plantation mill, local area workers compared with highland workers, and current smokers. Conclusion: Results showed both occupational and behavioral factors play significant roles in declines in kidney function. These results underline the need for a comprehensive approach to the epidemic as well as further investigation of risk factors to guide research and interventions.
Metal implant allergy: A retrospective cohort analysis at a university allergy practice

Mark J. Taliercio,Rawaa K. Alnabulsi,Priya A. Uppal,Ian M. Shaw,Kristy M. Semenza,Muhammad A. Pasha

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2500/aap.2024.45.240005

2024-05-01

Allergy and Asthma Proceedings

Abstract:Background: Concern of metal sensitization in pre- and postsurgical evaluation is growing, with the recent guidelines remaining the criterion standard for consideration of patch testing. Information remains scarce on surgical screening in the groups of patients who reported a history of metal sensitivity versus those with no reported history. Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the utility of patch testing in surgical candidates based on reported metal allergy history. The secondary objective was to evaluate the utility and outcomes in postsurgical patch testing. Methods: Nine hundred and thirty-one patient charts of patients with the diagnosis of “contact dermatitis” who underwent an evaluation at a single allergy clinic site between January 2013 and December 2022 were identified and reviewed as part of a retrospective chart review study. Patients were included in subgroups based on the time of patch testing and history of reported metal allergy. Results: In all, 67 patients underwent patch testing, 10 (14.9%) of whom were surgical candidates without a history of metal sensitivity, 31 (46.2%) of whom were surgical candidates with a history of metal sensitivity, and 26 (38.8%) of whom were postsurgical patients. Twenty-nine (43.3%) of patients had positive patch testing results, with only one (10%) in the presurgical group, 17 (54.8%) in the presurgical with a history of metal sensitivity, and 11 (42.3%) in the postsurgical group. Zero patients in our cohort without metal sensitivity who were undergoing the Nuss procedure had positive reactions on patch testing, whereas two of four (50%) with reported metal sensitivity who were undergoing the Nuss procedure had positive relevant metal reactions. Conclusion: Ambiguity in the utility of patch testing for surgical decision making remains, despite common utilization. Recent guidelines along with coordination of care among the surgeon, allergist, and patient remains the criterion standard of care.

allergy
Metal allergy--a review on exposures, penetration, genetics, prevalence, and clinical implications

Jacob P Thyssen,Torkil Menné

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/tx9002726

2010-02-15

Abstract:The prevalence of metal allergy is high in the general population, and it is estimated that up to 17% of women and 3% of men are allergic to nickel and that 1-3% are allergic to cobalt and chromium. Among dermatitis patients, the prevalence of metal allergy is even higher. Metal allergy is mainly an environmental disorder although null mutations in the filaggrin gene complex were recently found to be associated with nickel allergy and dermatitis. Environmental metal exposures include jewelry, buttons, clothing fasteners, dental restorations, mobile phones, and leather. Although consumer exposure is responsible for most cases of metal allergy, the importance of occupational metal exposure remains present and should always be taken into consideration when one interprets allergic patch test reactions to metals. Traditionally, nickel, cobalt, and chromium have been the most important contact allergens. However, recently, gold and palladium have drawn much attention as the prevalence of contact allergy to these metals is high. Palladium allergy is mainly a result of cross-sensitization to nickel, whereas gold allergy is rarely clinically relevant when one takes its high prevalence into account. The epidemiology of metal allergy has recently changed in Europe as nickel allergy among ear-pierced Danish women has decreased following regulatory intervention on nickel release from consumer products. In the United States, the prevalence of nickel allergy is still increasing, which may be explained by the absence of regulation. The prevalence of chromium allergy is increasing in the United States, Singapore, and Denmark among dermatitis patients. This increase is significantly associated with leather exposure in Denmark. Metal allergy may result in allergic contact dermatitis and systemic allergic (contact) dermatitis. Furthermore, metal allergy has been associated with device failure following insertion of intracoronary stents, hip and knee prostheses, as well as other implants. This area is in need of more research.
Characterization and comparative analysis of 2,4-toluene diisocyanate and 1,6-hexamethylene diisocyanate haptenated human serum albumin and hemoglobin.

Morgen Mhike,J. Hettick,Itai Chipinda,Brandon F Law,T. Bledsoe,A. Lemons,A. Nayak,B. Green,D. Beezhold,R. H. Simoyi,P. Siegel

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jim.2016.02.005

2016-04-01

Abstract:
Clinical predictors of metal allergic sensitization in orthodontic patients

Martina Zigante,Stjepan Špalj

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21101/cejph.a7122

Abstract:Objectives: This study aimed to assess the predictors of allergic sensitisation to titanium and nickel in patients undergoing orthodontic treatment. Methods: A total of 250 patients undergoing orthodontic treatment were invited to participate, and 235 were analysed (67% females). A patch test was performed using nickel sulphate, titanium, titanium dioxide, titanium oxalate, titanium nitride, and petrolatum as control. In addition, clinical signs of the oral mucosa, gingiva, tongue, lips, and allergological history were assessed. Results: The predictors of metal allergic sensitisation in patients undergoing orthodontic treatment were adult age (OR = 2.6; 95% CI: 1.2-5.5; p = 0.016), female sex (OR = 3.0; 95% CI: 1.1-7.9; p = 0.025), exfoliative cheilitis (OR = 4.8; 95% CI: 1.9-12.4; p = 0.001), history of contact hypersensitivity (OR = 7.0; 95% CI: 1.3-35.4; p = 0.025), history of contact hypersensitivity to metals (OR = 8.3; 95% CI: 1.4-50.2; p = 0.021), and piercings (OR = 5.4; 95% CI: 2.1-13.9; p = 0.001). When predictors were analysed separately for these two metals, titanium sensitisation predictors were contact hypersensitivity to metals and piercing, whereas nickel sensitisation predictors were age and piercing. Conclusion: A positive patch test alone cannot draw definite conclusions regarding allergy. However, metal allergies in patients with orthodontic appliances could be considered in cases of previous contact hypersensitivity, previous reactions to metals, exfoliative cheilitis, and piercing.
Metal Allergy: State-of-the-Art Mechanisms, Biomarkers, Hypersensitivity to Implants

Magdalena Zemelka-Wiacek

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11236971

2022-11-25

Abstract:Metal allergy is mainly an environmental disorder which can cause allergic contact dermatitis. Environmental metal exposures include jewelry, everyday metal items, mobile phones, leather, metal-rich food and implants, including stents or anchors. While consumer exposure is liable for the majority of metal hypersensitivity cases, the significance of occupational exposure to metals remains relevant. Although the most common metal allergens are nickel, chromium, and cobalt; however, lately, gold, palladium, titanium, and some others have also attracted attention. This review highlights advances in metal allergy mechanisms, biomarkers for potential patients' stratification as well as biological treatments. The most recent evidence of human exposure to metal for risk assessment is discussed, as well as the relationship between the occurrence of metal hypersensitivity and implanted devices, including non-characteristic symptoms. The latest data on the diagnosis of metal hypersensitivity are also reported.
A literature review and expert consensus statement on diagnostics in suspected metal implant allergy

P. Thomas,P. Arenberger,R. Bader,A. J. Bircher,M. Bruze,N. de Graaf,D. Hartmann,J. D. Johansen,A. Jowitz‐Heinke,V. Krenn,M. Kurek,A. Odgaard,T. Rustemeyer,B. Summer,J. P. Thyssen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.20026

2024-04-14

Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology

Abstract:Background Although rare, allergic reactions to metal implants represent a diagnostic challenge in view of missing guidelines. Objectives To develop an European expert consensus on characteristics of metal allergy reactions and the utility of various diagnostic tools in suspected metal implant allergy. Methods A nominal group technique (NGT) was applied to develop consensus statements. Initially an online literature database was created on a secure server to enable a comprehensive information. Twenty‐three statements were formulated on potential aspects of metal implant allergy with a focus on diagnostics and grouped into five domains. For the consensus development, the panel of 12 experts initially did refine and reformulate those statements that were ambiguous or had unclear wording. By face‐to‐face (9/12) or virtual participation (3/12), an anonymous online voting was performed. Results Consensus (≥80% of agreement) was reached in 20/23 statements. The panel agreed that implant allergy despite being rare should be considered in case of persistent unexplained symptoms. It was, however, recommended to allow adequate time for resolution of symptoms associated with healing and integration of an implant. Obtaining questionnaire‐aided standardized medical history and standardized scoring of patient outcomes was also considered an important step by all experts There was broad consensus regarding the utility/performance of patch testing with additional late reading. It was recognized that the lymphocyte transformation test (LTT) has to many limitations to be generally recommended. Prior to orthopaedic implant, allergy screening of patients without a history of potential allergy to implant components was not recommended. Conclusions Using an expert consensus process, statements concerning allergy diagnostics in suspected metal implant allergy were created. Areas of nonconsensus were identified, stressing uncertainty among the experts around topics such as preoperative testing in assumed allergy, histological correlate of periimplant allergy and in vitro testing, which underscores the need for further research.

dermatology
High prevalence of contact hypersensitivity to metals and preservatives in Chinese patients with atopic dermatitis

Fen Peng,Robert A. Schwartz,Zhou Chen,Jian-Zhong Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/cm9.0000000000000526

IF: 6.133

2019-11-12

Chinese Medical Journal

Abstract:Atopic dermatitis (AD) is an inflammatory skin disease characterized by chronic recurrent dermatitis with profound pruritus. Most patients have personal and/or family history of atopic diseases.<sup><a class="ejp-citation-link js-ejp-citation-link">[1]</a></sup> Allergy to air allergens and food allergens was regarded as an important feature of AD. There have been few studies for contact sensitization in patients with AD. The question remains if patch testing to a greater extent should be used as a screening tool in AD patients, to exclude hidden allergies possibly maintaining or aggravating their skin symptoms. In this study, we compared patch test results between patients with AD and non-AD patients including patients with facial dermatitis, eczema, psoriasis, pruritus and urticaria, and including some healthy population.

medicine, general & internal
Research Directions for Distributed Operating Systems

Tim King

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-52609-9_88

1989-04-18

Abstract:
[Comparative Study of Sensitivity of Different Dental Metal Materials].

Yue Liu,Xiao-ping Wang,Bin Wu,Yue Hu,Xia Dou,Hong-ying Sun,Ya-tong Ding,Xin Zhang

2014-01-01

Abstract:PURPOSE:To compare the sensitivity of different dental metal materials, in order to provide references for choosing of dental metal materials.METHODS:Patch test was performed on 92 patients wearing dental metal prosthesis. Pearson Chi-square test, corrected Chi-square test and Fisher exact test were used for statistical analysis with SPSS17.0 software package.RESULTS:(1)The sensitivity rates of different metal materials were different. The allergy rate of nickel (Ni) was the highest (22.8%), while the allergy rate of aluminum (Al) was 0. (2)More women were allergic to both palladium (Pd) and nickel (Ni) than men with significant difference (P>0.05). (3)Women with ear piercing were more allergic to nickel (Ni), but there was no significant correlation between ear piercing and nickel allergy (P>0.05).(4)There was cross reaction between nickel(Ni)and palladium (Pd), 83.3% of palladium (Pd) allergy patients were allergic to nickel (Ni), while 47.6% of nickel(Ni) allergy patients were allergic to palladium (Pd). (5)Patch test had a delayed reaction.CONCLUSIONS:Dental metal materials have certain allergies, women are more allergic to both palladium (Pd) and nickel (Ni) than men, with significant difference. Patch test may have a delayed reaction. If necessary, observation for 96 h, 7 days or even longer time, are needed to exclude false positivity. Supported by Research Fund of Science and Technology Committee of Shanghai Municipality (10411950900).
Unveiling the Role of Metal Ion Concentration versus Immune Sensitization in Orthodontic Patients-A Long-Term Prospective Evaluation

Nusha Paschaei,Wolf-Dieter Müller,Franziska Schmidt,Katrin Hüsker,Volker von Baehr,Nikolaos Pandis,Paul-Georg Jost-Brinkmann,Theodosia Bartzela

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13154545

2024-08-03

Abstract:Background: This longitudinal prospective study aimed to assess orthodontic patients' immune system response to metal ion release in saliva. Methods: Thirty adult patients (18-35 years) were equally divided into three groups: groups at the end (G1) and beginning (G2) of multibracket appliances (MBA) treatment and a non-treated control group (G3). Participants were evaluated at four timepoints within 21 days, with saliva samples being analyzed for metal ion concentrations and blood for the lymphocyte transformation test (LTT). Results: There were no significant differences between groups or timepoints for saliva. LTT analyses revealed hypersensitivity in one-third of all patients and 50% of G2 for nickel, with three developing sensitizations after MBA insertion. All nickel-sensitized patients exhibited varying elevated saliva nickel concentrations. The most nickel-sensitized patients had low ion saliva loads. In borderline nickel-sensitization cases, saliva ion concentrations were up to 20 times higher than the reference. Hypersensitivity to palladium, gold, and mercury was also observed. Conclusions: These findings indicate that increased MBA ion release was not inherently linked to the immune response (Type-IV sensitization), as reactions occurred even with ion levels below thresholds. This underlines the need for a comprehensive evaluation of the immune response to metal ion release in orthodontic patients.
Insights into the Health Status of the General Population Living Near an Electroplating Industry Zone: Metal Elevations and Renal Impairment

Peiwei Xu,Shiming Lai,Lizhi Wu,Weizhong Chen,Yuan Chen,Dandan Xu,Jie Xiang,Ping Cheng,Zhijian Chen,Xiaofeng Wang,Xiaoming Lou,Jun Tang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-24411-9

2022-01-01

Environmental Science and Pollution Research International

Abstract:A cross-sectional study was conducted in 2016 in Zhejiang Province, China, to evaluate the body burdens of metals and metalloids associated with renal dysfunction in populations living near electroplating industries. We recruited 236 subjects and performed physical examinations, determined the blood and urinary levels of arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd), chromium (Cr), manganese (Mn), nickel (Ni), lead (Pb), antimony (Sb), and selenium (Se) by an inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer (ICP-MS), and measured three renal impairment biomarkers, namely nacetyl-beta-(D)-glucosaminidase (NAG), retinol-binding protein (RBP), and beta(2)-microglobulin (BMG). The proportion of abnormal nasal symptoms in the exposure group (10.1%) was much higher than in the control group (0; p < 0.05). The blood and urinary levels of As, Cd, and Se in the exposure group were significantly higher than those in the control group (p < 0.05). The blood levels of Mn and Pb, as well as the urinary levels of Cr and Ni, were significantly higher in the exposure group than in the control group (p < 0.05). The exposure group demonstrated higher levels of NAG, RBP, and BMG than the control group ( 0.51 vs. 0.14 mg/g creatinine, 12.79 vs. 9.26 IU/g creatinine, and 1.39 vs. 0.78 mg/g creatinine, respectively; p < 0.05). Urinary BMG was positively correlated with urinary Cd levels (r = 0.223, p < 0.05), while urinary RBP was correlated with blood Cd levels (r = 0.151, p < 0.05) and urinary Cd, Cr, Ni, and Se levels (r = 0.220, 0.303, 0.162, and 0.306, respectively; p < 0.05). In conclusion, our study indicated that a population living in the vicinity of electroplating industries had high body burdens of certain metals and metalloids associated with non-negligible renal dysfunction.
Prevalence of contact allergy to gold in dermatitis patients from 2010 to 2024: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Mikkel Bak Jensen,Christoffer Kursawe Larsen,Daniel Isufi,Farzad Seyed‐Alinaghi,Malin G. Ahlström,Charlotte G. Mortz,Jeanne D. Johansen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.14707

2024-09-29

Contact Dermatitis

Abstract:Proportion meta‐analysis plot with random effects for dermatitis patients tested with gold salts after 2010. In total, 16 studies were included in the meta‐analysis comprising 14 887 dermatitis patients of whom 2347 had a positive patch test yielding a pooled proportion prevalence of 14.1% (95% confidence intervals: 9.5–19.4). Gold contact allergy is diagnosed by patch testing using gold chloride or gold sodium thiosulfate. These tests often show high positivity rates, but a direct correlation with dermatitis from everyday gold exposure is rare. The aim of this study was to investigate and estimate the current prevalence of gold contact allergy in dermatitis patients. We performed a systematic literature search in PubMed, Embase and Web of Science for studies reporting the prevalence of gold contact allergy in dermatitis patients and published between January 2010 and May 2024. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed, and pooled proportions were calculated using random effects models. Sixteen studies with 14 887 dermatitis patients were included. The pooled prevalence of gold contact allergy was 14.1% (95% confidence intervals: 9.5%–19.4%) with significant heterogeneity (I2 = 98.3%). High positivity rates with limited clinical relevance highlight the need for cautious interpretation. Even within the same country, studies find different prevalence rates. Standardized testing protocols and further research are needed to better understand and manage this allergy.

dermatology,allergy
Association of Metal Exposure with Novel Immunoinflammatory Indicators

Lingxiao Zhao,Xieyi Chen,Zhongwen Chen,Cantao Yang,Qiang Huang,Shuqun Cheng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics12050316

2024-04-27

Toxics

Abstract:Objective: We aimed to investigate the relationship between metal exposure and novel immunoinflammatory indicators. Methods: Data on adults participating in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 2009 to 2018 were analyzed. Various statistical models were employed to assess the association between metal exposure and novel immune-inflammation-related indicators. Additionally, the impact of metal exposure on inflammation in different gender populations was explored. Results: This study included 4482 participants, of whom 51.1% were male. Significant correlations were observed among various metals. Both elastic net (ENET) and linear regression models revealed robust associations between cadmium (Cd), cobalt (Co), arsenic (As), mercury (Hg), and immunoinflammatory indicators. Weighted quantile sum (WQS) and Quantile g-computation (Q-gcomp) models demonstrated strong associations between barium (Ba), Co, and Hg and immunoinflammatory indicators. Bayesian kernel machine regression (BKMR) analysis indicated an overall positive correlation between in vivo urinary metal levels and systemic inflammation response index (SIRI) and aggregate index of systemic inflammation (AISI). Furthermore, Co, As, and Hg emerged as key metals contributing to changes in novel immunoinflammatory indicators. Conclusions: Metals exhibit associations with emerging immunoinflammatory indicators, and concurrent exposure to mixed metals may exacerbate the inflammatory response. Furthermore, this relationship varies across gender populations.

environmental sciences,toxicology
Patient Journey Map: Metal Hypersensitivity

J Adrienne Lagura,Dzifa Dordunoo,Anastasia Mallidou,Jett Carey,Elizabeth M Borycki,Andre Kushniruk

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/23743735231183576

2023-06-20

Abstract:In this study, we highlight patients' experiences with metal hypersensitivity (MH) after receiving implantable medical devices (IMDs). We aim to identify gaps in clinical care and improve outcomes for individuals who have or may be sensitive to metals. Secondary data analysis from a previous interpretative phenomenological qualitative study was utilized. Using patient journey maps, we explored the experiences of 8 individuals from outpatient settings who received IMD and have first-hand experience with MH. We documented their journey from MH symptom recognition to diagnosis and subsequent IMD management. The results reveal that the time frames from device implantation to the treatment of MH varied from 17 to 228 months. The longest phase on the patient journey maps was the symptom recognition phase, which refers to the time between symptom emergence and MH diagnosis. Participants also required extensive healthcare utilization following their initial surgery. These findings emphasize that MH should be considered in differential diagnoses for patients with IMD. Early screening and detection of MH can enhance patient safety, alleviate distress, and reduce unnecessary healthcare utilization.
Blood metal concentrations and cardiac structure and function in total joint arthroplasty patients

Peter C Brennan,Stephanie M Peterson,Thomas J O'Byrne,Mariana L Laporta,Cody C Wyles,Paul J Jannetto,Garvan C Kane,Maria Vassilaki,Hilal Maradit Kremers

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v15.i8.773

2024-08-18

Abstract:Background: There is concern regarding potential long-term cardiotoxicity with systemic distribution of metals in total joint arthroplasty (TJA) patients. Aim: To determine the association of commonly used implant metals with echocardiographic measures in TJA patients. Methods: The study comprised 110 TJA patients who had a recent history of high chromium, cobalt or titanium concentrations. Patients underwent two-dimensional, three-dimensional, Doppler and speckle-strain transthoracic echocardiography and a blood draw to measure metal concentrations. Age and sex-adjusted linear and logistic regression models were used to examine the association of metal concentrations (exposure) with echocardiographic measures (outcome). Results: Higher cobalt concentrations were associated with increased left ventricular end-diastolic volume (estimate 5.09; 95%CI: 0.02-10.17) as well as left atrial and right ventricular dilation, particularly in men but no changes in cardiac function. Higher titanium concentrations were associated with a reduction in left ventricle global longitudinal strain (estimate 0.38; 95%CI: 0.70 to 0.06) and cardiac index (estimate 0.08; 95%CI, -0.15 to -0.01). Conclusion: Elevated cobalt and titanium concentrations may be associated with structural and functional cardiac changes in some patients. Longitudinal studies are warranted to better understand the systemic effects of metals in TJA patients.
Allergy to Surgical Implants

Karin A Pacheco

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12016-018-8707-y

Abstract:Surgical implants are essential elements of repair procedures to correct worn out joints, damaged spinal components, heart and vascular disease, and chronic pain. However, many of the materials that provide stability, flexibility, and durability to the implants are also immunogenic. Fortunately, allergic responses to surgical implants are infrequent. When they do occur, however, the associated pain, swelling, inflammation, and decreased range of motion can significantly impair the implant function. Given the high numbers of joint replacements performed in the developed world, allergic reactions to orthopedic implants form the largest category of allergic responses. The most important allergens in this category include nickel, cobalt, chromium, and bone cement. These allergens are also the most important in reactions to spinal surgeries. Multiple cardiac and neurostimulatory devices are constructed of metals and adhesives that can be sensitizing in some individuals. Implantable pulse generators, important in cardiac pacemakers, gastric stimulators, and neurostimulators, may include components made of stainless steel, titanium alloy, platinum and iridium, epoxy resins, poly methyl methacrylates, and isocyanates, all of which are immunogenic in some patients. Cardiac stents and patches are often made of Nitinol, a composite of nickel and titanium. More surgical procedures are closed using skin glues, which are also capable of triggering a blistering contact dermatitis. Patch testing is the gold standard to determine sensitization, and this review provides a list of standard allergens to test for different implants. The patients most appropriate for testing include (1) pre-operative joint replacement patients with a prior history of skin reactions to metal jewelry, jean snaps, watch bands, metal glass frames, artificial nails, or skin glue; (2) post-operative joint replacement failure patients needing revision without an obvious cause such as infection or mechanical incompatibility; and (3) post-operative cardiac or neurological patients with localized rash, pain, swelling, or inflammation near or over the implant.
Contact Sensitization to Nickel and Its Relevance with Ear Piercing in A Self-selected Population in Beijing

ZHAO Jian,XU Man-Ling,LIU Jing,WANG Jing,LI Lin-Feng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-8705.2013.02.016

2013-01-01

Abstract:Objective To investigate the contact sensitization to nickel and its relevance with ear piercing in a university student population in Beijing.Methods Healthy volunteers were recruited from university students in Beijing.The history of ear-piercing and metal allergy was collected from a questionnaire,and nickel patch test was performed among the volunteers to determine whether they were suffering from nickel allergy or not.Results 57/201(28.4%) volunteers had history of metal allergy,72/201(35.8%) had history of ear-piercing.The positivity rate of nickel patch test in volunteers was 12.9%(26/201).The positivity rate of nickel patch test in volunteers with history of ear-piercing(26.4%,19/72) was much higher than those without history of ear-piercing(5.4%,7/129,P<0.001).The positivity rate of nickel patch test in female volunteers(17.1%,24/140) was higher than in male(3.3%,2/61,P<0.05).However,the positivity rate of nickel patch test in female volunteers without history of ear-piercing(6.9%,5/72) was similar to male without history of ear-piercing(3.5%,2/57,P>0.05).Conclusions Nickel allergy is common and related to ear-piercing in university students in Beijing.
Association Between Metal Hypersensitivity and Implant Failure in Patients Who Underwent Titanium Cranioplasty.

Yirui Sun,Yue Hu,Qiang Yuan,Jian Yu,Xing Wu,Zhuoying Du,Xuehai Wu,Jin Hu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3171/2018.1.jns171804

IF: 5.408

2018-01-01

Journal of Neurosurgery

Abstract:OBJECTIVEDigitally designed titanium plates are commonly used for the reconstruction of craniofacial defects, although implant exposure (referred to as failure) is one of the major complications. Metal hypersensitivities have been suggested as possible causes of implant failure of orthopedic, intravascular, gynecological, and dental devices, yet there has been no consensus on the requirement for allergy screening before cranioplasty.METHODSIn this study, the authors prospectively investigated the prevalence of metal hypersensitivity in patients for whom cranioplasty is planned and assess its relationship with titanium implant failure (exposure).RESULTSBased on records from 207 included patients, 39.61% of patients showed hypersensitivity to at least one kind of metal. Approximately one-quarter (25.12%) of patients had multiple metal allergies. Co, Cd, and Zn were the 3 most frequently identified metal hypersensitivities. No allergy to titanium was detected in this study. The overall incidence of cranioplasty implant failure was 5.31% (11 of 207). Patients showing hypersensitivities to more than 3 kinds of metal had higher risks of titanium plate exposure.CONCLUSIONSBased on their findings, the authors suggest that routine allergy screening be performed before titanium plate cranioplasty. For patients with hypersensitivities to more than 3 metals, alternative materials, such as polyetheretherketone, should be considered for cranioplasty.
Clinical Diagnosis of Contact Allergy to Dental Metallic Restorative Materials

Yue LIU,Xiao-ping WANG,Bin WU,Xia DOU,Yue HU,Ya-tong DING,Xin ZHANG

IF: 1.9

2013-01-01

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Abstract:Objective: To determine the correlation between clinical symptoms and dental metal allergy. Methods: Two patients with suspicion to dental metal allergy, patch test and analysis of metal components were processed for final diagnosis. Results: Positive allergens in patch test were consistent with the metal prostheses ingredients. After removing metal prosthesis and a ceramic prosthesis was used as an alternative, allergy symptoms abated during the follow-up period. Conclusions: Dentists should understand the corrosion and allergy rates of alloys applied, reducing the application of high allergic alloys. Before restoration, a patch test for the hypersensitive patients may be recommended. The use of different metal alloys in the same mouth may be cautious.

CoopIS 2013 PC Co-Chairs Message

Risk Factors for Declines in Kidney Function in Sugarcane Workers in Guatemala

Metal implant allergy: A retrospective cohort analysis at a university allergy practice

Metal allergy--a review on exposures, penetration, genetics, prevalence, and clinical implications

Characterization and comparative analysis of 2,4-toluene diisocyanate and 1,6-hexamethylene diisocyanate haptenated human serum albumin and hemoglobin.

Clinical predictors of metal allergic sensitization in orthodontic patients

Metal Allergy: State-of-the-Art Mechanisms, Biomarkers, Hypersensitivity to Implants

A literature review and expert consensus statement on diagnostics in suspected metal implant allergy

High prevalence of contact hypersensitivity to metals and preservatives in Chinese patients with atopic dermatitis

Research Directions for Distributed Operating Systems

[Comparative Study of Sensitivity of Different Dental Metal Materials].

Unveiling the Role of Metal Ion Concentration versus Immune Sensitization in Orthodontic Patients-A Long-Term Prospective Evaluation

Insights into the Health Status of the General Population Living Near an Electroplating Industry Zone: Metal Elevations and Renal Impairment

Prevalence of contact allergy to gold in dermatitis patients from 2010 to 2024: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Association of Metal Exposure with Novel Immunoinflammatory Indicators

Patient Journey Map: Metal Hypersensitivity

Blood metal concentrations and cardiac structure and function in total joint arthroplasty patients

Allergy to Surgical Implants

Contact Sensitization to Nickel and Its Relevance with Ear Piercing in A Self-selected Population in Beijing

Association Between Metal Hypersensitivity and Implant Failure in Patients Who Underwent Titanium Cranioplasty.

Clinical Diagnosis of Contact Allergy to Dental Metallic Restorative Materials