Association Between Metal Hypersensitivity and Implant Failure in Patients Who Underwent Titanium Cranioplasty.

Yirui Sun,Yue Hu,Qiang Yuan,Jian Yu,Xing Wu,Zhuoying Du,Xuehai Wu,Jin Hu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3171/2018.1.jns171804
IF: 5.408
2018-01-01
Journal of Neurosurgery
Abstract:OBJECTIVEDigitally designed titanium plates are commonly used for the reconstruction of craniofacial defects, although implant exposure (referred to as failure) is one of the major complications. Metal hypersensitivities have been suggested as possible causes of implant failure of orthopedic, intravascular, gynecological, and dental devices, yet there has been no consensus on the requirement for allergy screening before cranioplasty.METHODSIn this study, the authors prospectively investigated the prevalence of metal hypersensitivity in patients for whom cranioplasty is planned and assess its relationship with titanium implant failure (exposure).RESULTSBased on records from 207 included patients, 39.61% of patients showed hypersensitivity to at least one kind of metal. Approximately one-quarter (25.12%) of patients had multiple metal allergies. Co, Cd, and Zn were the 3 most frequently identified metal hypersensitivities. No allergy to titanium was detected in this study. The overall incidence of cranioplasty implant failure was 5.31% (11 of 207). Patients showing hypersensitivities to more than 3 kinds of metal had higher risks of titanium plate exposure.CONCLUSIONSBased on their findings, the authors suggest that routine allergy screening be performed before titanium plate cranioplasty. For patients with hypersensitivities to more than 3 metals, alternative materials, such as polyetheretherketone, should be considered for cranioplasty.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?