Invited Talk Human-Agent Teamwork in Cyber Defense

J. Bradshaw

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33690-4_1

2012-10-10

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Knowledge mobilization with and for equity-deserving communities invested in research: A scoping review protocol

Ramy Barhouche,Samson Tse,Fiona Inglis,Debbie Chaves,Erin Allison,Tina Colaco,Melody Morton Ninomiya

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.06.24313221

2024-09-07

Abstract:The practice of putting research into action is known by various names, depending on disciplinary norms. Knowledge mobilization, translation, and transfer (collectively referred to as K*) are three common terminologies used in research literature. Knowledge-to-action opportunities and gaps in academic research often remain obscure to non-academic researchers in communities, policy and decision makers, and practitioners who could benefit from up-to-date information on health and wellbeing. Academic research training, funding, and performance metrics rarely prioritize or address non-academic community needs from research. We propose to conduct a scoping review on reported K* in community-driven research contexts, examining the governance, processes, methods, and benefits of K*, and mapping who, what, where, and when K* terminology is used. This protocol paper outlines our approach to gathering, screening, analyzing, and reporting on available published literature from four databases.
Patient, caregiver and other knowledge user engagement in consensus-building healthcare initiatives: a scoping review protocol

Sarah E. P. Munce,Elliott Wong,Dorothy Luong,Justin Rao,Jessie Cunningham,Katherine Bailey,Tomisin John,Claire Barber,Michelle Batthish,Kyle Chambers,Kristin Cleverley,Marilyn Crabtree,Sanober Diaz,Gina Dimitropoulos,Jan Willem Gorter,Danijela Grahovac,Ruth Grimes,Beverly Guttman,Michèle L Hébert,Megan Henze,Amanda Higgins,Dmitry Khodyakov,Elaine Li,Lisha Lo,Laura Macgregor,Sarah Mooney,Samadhi Mora Severino,Geetha Mukerji,Melanie Penner,Jacklynn Pidduck,Rayzel Shulman,Lisa Stromquist,Patricia Trbovich,Michelle Wan,Laura Williams,Darryl Yates,Alene Toulany

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080822

IF: 3.006

2024-05-09

BMJ Open

Abstract:Introduction Patient engagement and integrated knowledge translation (iKT) processes improve health outcomes and care experiences through meaningful partnerships in consensus-building initiatives and research. Consensus-building is essential for engaging a diverse group of experienced knowledge users in co-developing and supporting a solution where none readily exists or is less optimal. Patients and caregivers provide invaluable insights for building consensus in decision-making around healthcare, policy and research. However, despite emerging evidence, patient engagement remains sparse within consensus-building initiatives. Specifically, our research has identified a lack of opportunity for youth living with chronic health conditions and their caregivers to participate in developing consensus on indicators/benchmarks for transition into adult care. To bridge this gap and inform our consensus-building approach with youth/caregivers, this scoping review will synthesise the extent of the literature on patient and other knowledge user engagement in consensus-building healthcare initiatives. Methods and analysis Following the scoping review methodology from Joanna Briggs Institute, published literature will be searched in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and PsycINFO databases from inception to July 2023. Grey literature will be hand-searched. Two independent reviewers will determine the eligibility of articles in a two-stage process, with disagreements resolved by a third reviewer. Included studies must be consensus-building studies within the healthcare context that involve patient engagement strategies. Data from eligible studies will be extracted and charted on a standardised form. ed data will be analysed quantitatively and descriptively, according to specific consensus methodologies, and patient engagement models and/or strategies. Ethics and dissemination Ethics approval is not required for this scoping review protocol. The review process and findings will be shared with and informed by relevant knowledge users. Dissemination of findings will also include peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. The results will offer new insights for supporting patient engagement in consensus-building healthcare initiatives. Protocol registration https://osf.io/beqjr

medicine, general & internal
Effect of a bacterial lipopolysaccharide treatment on rabbit testis and ejaculated sperm.

Giulia Collodel,C. Castellini,M. D. Vecchio,R. Cardinali,M. Geminiani,B. Rossi,Adriano Spreafico,Elena Moretti

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.2011.01882.x

2012-06-01

Abstract:In a previous study, we reported the short- and long-term effects of bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced inflammation on rabbit sperm quality. This study was aimed at exploring the spermatogenesis of the rabbit model focussing on the possible damages occurring to the testis and ejaculated sperm. Twenty New Zealand White rabbit bucks were divided into two groups. One group was inoculated intra-peritoneally with LPS, the other group, considered as control, was treated under the same conditions with saline only. Semen samples were collected before LPS injection, the 7th, 14th, 21st, 30th, 45th, 60th and 90th day after LPS treatment. Semen parameters were evaluated following international guidelines. The kinetic characteristics of ejaculated sperm were analysed using a computer-assisted sperm analyzer and the ultrastructural characteristics were explored by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). On the 7th, 14th and 30th day, testis from treated rabbits and controls were obtained. Testis samples were analysed by light microscopy and TEM. The induced LPS lesions in the testis became evident the 7th day after treatment, with a decrease in germinal cells and with an increase in structurally altered Sertoli cells; normal spermatogenesis was restored on the 30th day. The testicular damages observed on day 7 were probably responsible for the reduction in sperm concentration and motility and the ultrastructural alterations that were detected in the ejaculated sperm on the 14th through the 30th days after treatment. In conclusion, rabbit buck treated with LPS could be a useful model for studying the effect of an induced systemic inflammation on spermatogenesis.
A chair at the table: a scoping review of the participation of refugees in community-based participatory research in healthcare

Tali Filler,Pardeep Kaur Benipal,Nazi Torabi,Ripudaman Singh Minhas

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-021-00756-7

2021-09-06

Globalization and Health

Abstract:Abstract Background Refugees often face psychosocial complexity and multi-dimensional healthcare needs. Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) methods have been previously employed in designing health programs for refugee communities and in building strong research partnerships in refugee communities. However, the extent to which these communities are involved remains unknown. Objective To review the evidence on the involvement of refugees in CBPR processes to inform healthcare research. Methods A scoping review was performed, using Arksey & O’Malley’s methodological framework. A literature search in Medline, PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Embase, Global Health, Scopus, and Policy File Index for articles published until August 2020 was conducted. Articles were included if they focused on CBPR, had refugee involvement, and discussed healthcare/health policy. Results 4125 articles were identified in the database searches. After removal of duplicates, 2077 articles underwent title and abstract review by two authors, yielding an inter-reviewer kappa-statistic of 0.85. 14 studies were included in the final analysis. The purpose of CBPR use for 6 (42.9%) of the articles was developing and implementing mental health/social support interventions, 5 (35.7%) focused on sexual and reproductive health interventions, 1 (7.1%) focused on domestic violence interventions, 1 (7.1%) focused on cardiovascular disease prevention and 1 (7.1%) focused on parenting interventions. In terms of refugee involvement in the various stages in the research process, 9 (64.3%) articles reported refugees having a role in the inception of the research, no articles reported including refugees in obtaining funding, all articles included refugees in the design of the research study, 10 (71.4%) articles reported having refugees involved in community engagement/recruitment, 8 (57.1%) articles reported involvement throughout the data collection process, 4 (28.6%) articles reported involvement in data analysis, 6 (42.9%) articles reported having refugees involved in knowledge translation/dissemination and 1 article (7.1%) reported having refugees contribute to scale up initiatives. Conclusions CBPR has been identified as a methodology with the potential to make substantial contributions to improving health and well-being in traditionally disenfranchised populations. As the needs of refugee communities are so diverse, efforts should be made to include refugees as partners in all stages of the research process.

public, environmental & occupational health
Reinforcing the conventional sternal closure.

Heinz R Zurbrügg,Timothy Freestone,Matthias Bauer,Roland Hetzer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(00)01301-1

2000-06-01

Abstract:
Knowledge translation strategies for dissemination with a focus on healthcare recipients: an overview of systematic reviews

Evelina Chapman,Michelle M. Haby,Tereza Setsuko Toma,Maritsa Carla de Bortoli,Eduardo Illanes,Maria Jose Oliveros,Jorge O. Maia Barreto

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-020-0974-3

2020-03-04

Implementation Science

Abstract:Abstract Background While there is an ample literature on the evaluation of knowledge translation interventions aimed at healthcare providers, managers, and policy-makers, there has been less focus on patients and their informal caregivers. Further, no overview of the literature on dissemination strategies aimed at healthcare users and their caregivers has been conducted. The overview has two specific research questions: (1) to determine the most effective strategies that have been used to disseminate knowledge to healthcare recipients, and (2) to determine the barriers (and facilitators) to dissemination of knowledge to this group. Methods This overview used systematic review methods and was conducted according to a pre-defined protocol. A comprehensive search of ten databases and five websites was conducted. Both published and unpublished reviews in English, Spanish, or Portuguese were included. A methodological quality assessment was conducted; low-quality reviews were excluded. A narrative synthesis was undertaken, informed by a matrix of strategy by outcome measure. The Health System Evidence taxonomy for “consumer targeted strategies” was used to separate strategies into one of six categories. Results We identified 44 systematic reviews that describe the effective strategies to disseminate health knowledge to the public, patients, and caregivers. Some of these reviews also describe the most important barriers to the uptake of these effective strategies. When analyzing those strategies with the greatest potential to achieve behavioral changes, the majority of strategies with sufficient evidence of effectiveness were combined, frequent, and/or intense over time. Further, strategies focused on the patient, with tailored interventions, and those that seek to acquire skills and competencies were more effective in achieving these changes. In relation to barriers and facilitators, while the lack of health literacy or e-literacy could increase inequities, the benefits of social media were also emphasized, for example by widening access to health information for ethnic minorities and lower socioeconomic groups. Conclusions Those interventions that have been shown to be effective in improving knowledge uptake or health behaviors should be implemented in practice, programs, and policies—if not already implemented. When implementing strategies, decision-makers should consider the barriers and facilitators identified by this overview to ensure maximum effectiveness. Protocol registration PROSPERO: CRD42018093245 .

health care sciences & services,health policy & services
What do you mean by engagement? – evaluating the use of community engagement in the design and implementation of chronic disease-based interventions for Indigenous populations – scoping review

Sahr Wali,Stefan Superina,Angela Mashford-Pringle,Heather Ross,Joseph A. Cafazzo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-020-01346-6

2021-01-06

International Journal for Equity in Health

Abstract:Abstract Background Indigenous populations have remained strong and resilient in maintaining their unique culture and values, despite centuries of colonial oppression. Unfortunately, a consequential result of facing years of adversity has led Indigenous populations to experience a disproportionate level of poorer health outcomes compared to non-Indigenous populations. Specifically, the rate of Indigenous chronic disease prevalence has significantly increased in the last decade. Many of the unique issues Indigenous populations experience are deeply rooted in their colonial history and the intergenerational traumas that has subsequently impacted their physical, mental, emotional and spiritual well-being. With this, to better improve Indigenous health outcomes, understanding the local context of their challenges is key. Studies have begun to use modes of community engagement to initiate Indigenous partnerships and design chronic disease-based interventions. However, with the lack of a methodological guideline regarding the appropriate level of community engagement to be used, there is concern that many interventions will continue to fall short in meeting community needs. Objective The objective of this study was to investigate the how various community engagement strategies have been used to design and/or implement interventions for Indigenous populations with chronic disease. Methods A scoping review guided by the methods outlined by Arksey and O’Malley was conducted. A comprehensive search was completed by two reviewers in five electronic databases using keywords related to community engagement, Indigenous health and chronic disease. Studies were reviewed using a descriptive-analytical narrative method and data was categorized into thematic groups reflective of the main findings. Results We identified 23 articles that met the criteria for this scoping review. The majority of the studies included the use a participatory research model and the procurement of study approval. However, despite the claimed use of participatory research methods, only 6 studies had involved community members to identify the area of priority and only five had utilized Indigenous interview styles to promote meaningful feedback. Adapting for the local cultural context and the inclusion of community outreach were identified as the key themes from this review. Conclusion Many studies have begun to adopt community engagement strategies to better meet the needs of Indigenous Peoples. With the lack of a clear guideline to approach Indigenous-based participatory research, we recommend that researchers focus on 1) building partnerships, 2) obtaining study approval and 3) adapting interventions to the local context.

public, environmental & occupational health
Protocol for a scoping review of traditional medicine research methods, methodologies, frameworks and strategies

Nadine Ijaz,Jennifer Hunter,Suzanne Grant,Kate Templeman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1409392

IF: 3.9

2024-07-10

Frontiers in Medicine

Abstract:Background The World Health Organization (WHO) has called for the evidence-informed integration of traditional medicine (TM) into health systems. Research rigor requires a good “fit” between research designs and what is being studied. The expectation that TM research fully adheres to biomedical evidentiary norms potentially creates tensions, as TM paradigms have their own distinct features. A scoping review will be conducted to describe and characterize the research approaches used in TM and their paradigmatic alignment with the TM being studied. Methods This scoping review protocol was informed by Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methods. This protocol outlines an a priori conceptual framework, provisionally termed “paradigmatic alignment.” The review will include all populations, TM types, research approaches (i.e., methods, methodologies, frameworks, strategies), cultural contexts, and health care settings. Up to 38 English and non-English language databases will be searched sequentially for both published and gray literature until reaching data saturation across relevant concepts and contexts. Analysis will begin deductively, using a pre-piloted data extraction template to describe the TM research approaches. A basic qualitative content analysis of a sample of evidence sources will explore how research approaches are applied or modified to align with the TM therapeutic paradigm, and the manner in which they co-exist, contrast, complement or align with established biomedical research approaches. The findings will be narrated and summarized in charting tables and figures. The review will be reported according to the PRISMA scoping review extension. Consultative engagement with knowledge users across all review stages is planned. Discussion Aligned with the principle of Two-Eyed Seeing ( Etuaptmumk ), wherein Indigenous/traditional and biomedical knowledges may equitably co-exist, this review promises to advance scholarly insights of critical value in an increasingly pluralistic, globalized world. Clinical trial registration : https://clinicaltrials.gov/ , identifier INPLASY2023110071.

medicine, general & internal
Barriers and facilitators of lifestyle management among adult South Asian migrants living with chronic diseases: A mixed-methods systematic review

Purva Gulyani,Priya Rawat,Yusra Elmi,Sabrina Gupta,Ching Shan Wan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsx.2024.102944

Abstract:Background and aim: South Asian migrants have a higher prevalence of chronic diseases than Caucasians. Despite much literature that has explored challenges in chronic disease management amongst the South Asian population in the past decades, their chronic disease management is still suboptimal. Understanding their determinants of disease management behaviour using the Theoretical Domains Framework will inform the development of a culturally sensitive intervention relevant to consumer-end-users. This study aimed to synthesise qualitative and quantitative studies on chronic disease management among adult South Asian immigrants. Methods: A mixed-methods systematic review was conducted using electronic databases. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool assessed the quality of the included studies. Quantitative data were transformed into qualitative data and analysed thematically. Subthemes were mapped in the Theoretical Domains Framework presenting barriers and facilitators under each theme. Results: 18293 studies were identified, of which 37 studies were included. The barriers and facilitators identified were categorised into four overarching themes: patient-provider interaction and relationship (e.g., complex language use by health professionals), the impact of migration (e.g., weather conditions had an impact on engagement with physical activity), heritage-based practices (e.g., an obligation to consume energy-dense food in social gatherings), and chronic disease management strategies (e.g., lack understanding of appropriate disease management strategies). Conclusion: This review provides a comprehensive understanding of the complexity of chronic disease management among South Asian migrants and insights into developing multifaceted interventions to address barriers to chronic disease management, guiding the healthcare professionals in helping overcome South Asians perceived barriers to managing chronic disease in the host countries.
Mechanisms and attitudes in responsive health care for forced migrant communities. A qualitative study of transnational practice.

Amy Rebecca Robinson,Ziaur Rahman A Khan,Kofi Amy Broadhurst,Laura Nellums,Gisela Renolds,Bayan Payman,Andrew Smith

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.29.24309172

2024-12-04

Abstract:Objectives: To understand the opportunities and practices that can support responsive health care for forced migrant communities. Design: Qualitative study of five transnational case examples of services actively working to improve access and experiences of care for forced migrant communities. One strand of the MORRA Study. Setting: Five services (Australia, Belgium, UK) providing a range of care (primary care, health advocacy, education and support, holistic health screening, care planning/coordination, transcultural mental health care). Delivered through state and not for profit structures in initial and contingency accommodation sites, health clinics, and community spaces. Data collection took place between July and October 2022. Participants: 47 participants including forced migrants using or having used one of the five services, service leads, clinical and nonclinical workers (paid and volunteer), interpreters, and service partners. Services supported recruitment of a crude representative sample of worker roles and service users/clients. Participants were required to speak one of nine languages for which we had translated study materials. Main outcome measures: Experiences, practices, knowledges, skills and attributes of workers; experiences of forced migrants engaging in services. Results: Services showed a willingness to innovate and work outside existing practice and organisational structures, including a microflexibility in their interactions with patients, and through the creation of safe spaces that encouraged trust in providers. Other positive behaviours included: engaging in intercultural exchange; facilitating the connection of people with their cultural sphere (e.g. nationality, language); and a reflexive attitude to the individual and their broader circumstances. Social and political structures can diminish these efforts. Conclusions: Environments that enable good health and support forced migrants to live lives of meaning are vital components of responsive care. This requires flexibility and reflexivity in practice, intercultural exchange, humility, and a commitment to communication. A broader range of caring practitioners can, and should, through intentional and interconnected communities of care, contribute to the health care of forced migrants. Opening up health care systems to include other state actors such as teachers and settlement workers and a range of nonstate actors that should include community leaders and peers and private players is a key step in this process. Future work should focus on the health and health service implications of immigration practices; the inclusion of peers in a range of health care roles; alliance building across unlikely collaborators and the embedding of intercultural exchange in practice. Findings of this study are supported by our systematic review (publication forthcoming). Strengths and limitations of this study We engaged with critical perceptions of care from across a range of international jurisdictions, community and health service contexts, and clinical and nonclinical professionalisms. A diverse and contrasting research team, including a multilingual community researcher, NHS clinicians, voluntary sector advocacy services, and academics, brought contrasting perspectives and backgrounds and broadened reflections. Unexpected restrictions; predominantly service pressures and restrictions placed by service hosts (accommodation providers), meant we engaged only a small number of service users and only with service users from some services.

Public and Global Health
Experimental studies testing interventions to promote cultural safety, interculturality or antiracism in healthcare: protocol for a systematic review

Sarmiento,I.,Rojas-Cardenas,A.,Zuluaga,G.,Belaid,L.,Cockcroft,A.,Andersson,N.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077227

IF: 3.006

2024-01-04

BMJ Open

Abstract:Introduction Cultural safety, interculturality and antiracism are crucial concepts in addressing health disparities of minority and diverse groups. Measuring them is challenging, however, due to overlapping meanings and their highly contextual nature. Community engagement is essential for evaluating these concepts, yet the methods for social inclusion and protocols for participation remain unclear. This review identifies experimental studies that measure changes resulting from culturally safe, intercultural or antiracist healthcare. The review will describe outcomes and additional factors addressed in these studies. Methods and analysis The study focuses on epidemiological experiments with counterfactual comparisons and explicit interventions involving culturally safe, intercultural or antiracist healthcare. The search strategy covers PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, ProQuest, LILACS and WHO IRIS databases. We will use critical appraisal tools from the Joanna Briggs Institute to assess the quality of randomised and non-randomised experimental studies. Two researchers will screen references, select studies and extract data to summarise the main characteristics of the studies, their approach to the three concepts under study and the reported effect measures. We will use fuzzy cognitive mapping models based on the causal relationships reported in the literature. We will consider the strength of the relationships depicted in the maps as a function of the effect measure reported in the study. Measures of centrality will identify factors with higher contributions to the outcomes of interest. Illustrative intervention modelling will use what-if scenarios based on the maps. Ethics and dissemination This review of published literature does not require ethical approval. We will publish the results in a peer-reviewed journal and present them at conferences. The maps emerging from the process will serve as evidence-based models to facilitate discussions with Indigenous communities to further the dialogue on the contributing factors and assessment of cultural safety, interculturality and antiracism. PROSPERO registration number CRD42023418459.

medicine, general & internal
Facilitators of and barriers to patient and public involvement in building learning health systems in community health services settings: a scoping review protocol

Lillian Hung,Karen Lok Yi Wong,Ian Chan,Krisztina Vasarhelyi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073837

IF: 3.006

2023-09-12

BMJ Open

Abstract:Introduction: The development of learning health systems (LHSs) has often focused on optimally leveraging data. More attention should be paid to patient and public involvement or community engagement in forming learning communities that work together to build LHS. This scoping review aims to identify facilitators of and barriers to involving patients and the public in building LHSs in community health services settings. Methods and analysis: We will use the Joanna Briggs Institute's scoping review methodology. We will review literature in English published from 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2022. The databases that will be searched are MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, AgeLine, PsycINFO and Web of Science. Key inclusion and exclusion criteria include the following: we will only consider a learning community in a community health services context (eg, home care, long-term care, primary care); we will exclude literature on acute care settings; and we will consider any research designs apart from big data analytics. We will review all sources, including university student theses and dissertations. The review will proceed in three steps: (1) we will identify keywords and index terms from the MEDLINE and CINAHL databases; (2) using the keywords and index terms identified in step (1), we will search other databases and (3) we will handsearch the reference lists of the selected literature and will search for grey literature using Google. Two research assistants will screen the titles and abstracts separately, with reference to the inclusion criteria. Two researchers will then assess the full text of selected studies, also in reference to the inclusion criteria. We will present the findings in a charting table and provide a narrative summary. Ethics and dissemination: This work does not require ethics approval because the data for this scoping review are publicly available. The findings will be presented in a journal article and at conferences.
Barriers and facilitators to refugees and asylum seekers accessing non hospital based care: A mixed methods systematic review protocol.

Laura Fitzharris,Emer McGowan,Julie Broderick

DOI: https://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13671.2

2023-12-19

HRB Open Research

Abstract:Context Social exclusion is characterised by and represents a form of disadvantage and marginalisation of vulnerable groups of people in society, who cannot fully participate in the normal activities of daily living. People who are socially excluded such as asylum seekers and refugees have complex healthcare needs and tend to present more to the acute hospital setting as emergency presentations. Little is known about barriers and facilitators experienced by this group to accessing nonhospital based care. Objectives This mixed methods systematic review, will critically examine the concept of barriers and facilitators for refugees and asylum seekers to accessing non hospital based care. Methods This methodological review will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute guidance for conducting mixed methods reviews. The following databases will be searched: Central Medline, PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library. Relevant grey literature will be included. Title and abstract screening, followed by full-text screening will be undertaken independently by two reviewers. The Joanna Briggs Institute extraction tool will be adapted for data extraction. Discussion This mixed method review will comprehensively evaluate quantitative and qualitative data, synthesise both barriers and facilitators and follow a systematic approach through establishing use of mixed methods research across asylum seekers and refugees, and how they affect accessing non-hospital based care. It will explore conceptual models of access to healthcare and how they influence these factors.
Patient, family and caregiver engagement in diabetes care: a scoping review protocol

Dita Chamoun,Mathankki Ramasamy,Carolyn Ziegler,Catherine H Yu,Pauline Wijeyesekera,Andrew Advani,Cheryl Pritlove

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086772

IF: 3.006

2024-09-01

BMJ Open

Abstract:Introduction New treatments and technologies have advanced diabetes care; however, diabetes continues to have a major impact on the daily lives of affected individuals, especially among equity-deserving groups. Evidence from patient engagement literature suggests that involving diverse patients in healthcare can create cost-effective improvements and enhanced efficiency in care that has high patient acceptability and numerous health benefits, as well as improved provider satisfaction. A scoping review will be conducted to provide a cohesive and comprehensive understanding of patient engagement practices and the resulting outcomes. Methods and analysis The review will follow the recommendations for the conduct of scoping reviews developed by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Scoping Review Methodology Group. The review will include English-language literature published between 1 January 1990 and the present, searched through MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), PsycINFO (Ovid), International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS), Sociological s, Applied Social Sciences Index and s (ASSIA), Scopus, Social Sciences Citation Index and Campbell Collaboration; hand searches; and grey literature. Literature that describes conceptualisations of engagement, methods/strategies for engagement and/or evaluations of engagement across different levels of diabetes care, including direct care, organisational design and governance and policymaking will be included. The review will encompass quantitative, qualitative and mixed-methods studies. Research that is secondary, published in languages other than English, or not specifically focused on patient engagement will be excluded. Screening and extraction will be completed by two independent reviewers and conflicts will be resolved by discussion or a third reviewer, with piloting at each step. Studies will be analysed through descriptive numerical summary and content analysis. Ethics and dissemination No ethical or safety considerations are pertinent to this work. The results will be disseminated to patients/patient advocacy groups, diabetes organisations, clinicians, researchers, decision-makers and policymakers by way of summary documents, infographics, meeting presentations and through peer-reviewed publications. Trial registration number The protocol has been registered with Open Science Framework: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/KCD7Z.

medicine, general & internal
Digital Methods in the Promotion of Well-Being in Immigrants: A Systematic Review

Paulo Nascimento,Magda Sofia Roberto,Maria Caetana Poole-da-Costa,Maria Lemos,Ana Sofia Santos

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-023-01450-z

2023-01-25

Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health

Abstract:Migration is a disruptive experience that undermines immigrants’ well-being. This systematic review explores the diversity of digital methods available to promote their well-being. The review includes 13 studies (6 were RCTs), comprising 8181 participants, collected through EBSCOhost web, b-ON, Scopus, SciELO and ProQuest, with no time restriction (to access all available literature). Primary outcomes were well-being (mental health; quality of life), and the secondary were stigma, integration and connection. Study quality was assessed by the QuADS tool. Digital methods are a valuable tool for improving immigrants’ well-being. M-integration methods tend to focus on promoting mental health in immigrants, developing individual resilience while participatory methods address the quality of life in refugees, contributing to social resilience. Digital methods must not only be part of the guidelines of interventions for immigrants and refugees but also be a foundation upon which those guidelines are outlined.

public, environmental & occupational health
Exploring how to widen the acceptability of public health interventions: a systematic review protocol

Conway-Moore,K.,Graham,F.,McKinlay,A. R.,Birch,J.,Oliver,E.,Bambra,C.,Kelly,M. P.,Bonell,C.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088418

IF: 3.006

2024-11-10

BMJ Open

Abstract:Introduction Health interventions that require significant change to individual lifestyles or social norms can pose a challenge for widespread public acceptability and uptake. At the same time, over the last two decades, there has been increasing attention paid to the rise of populist movements globally, defined by 'the people' pushing against 'an elite' viewed as depriving the people of their sovereignty. To understand potential overlap in these two areas, this study aims to synthesise existing international evidence on linkages between populist attitudes and reduced uptake, acceptability, adherence and/or effectiveness of public health interventions. The goal of this work is to create a conceptual framework that can be used to inform policy strategies aimed at widening the impact of public health interventions. Methods and analysis A systematic review will be performed via searches across databases and websites relevant to public health and social science research, informed by preliminary searches on the topic. There will be no language restrictions, but included studies will be limited to those produced since 2008, the year of the global financial crisis, from which most current literature on populism dates. Risk of bias will be assessed using validated tools according to study design. Due to expected heterogeneity across included studies, this will be a systematic review without meta-analysis. Findings will be synthesised narratively, and the strength of the evidence will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. The review will be reported according to the Systematic Reviews without Meta-Analysis reporting guidelines. Ethics and dissemination Ethical review is not required for this study. Public dissemination will be informed via consultation with our Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement Strategy Group, along with reporting via peer-reviewed publication, relevant international conferences, a policy brief and a workshop with public health and communications experts. PROSPERO registration number CRD42024513124.

medicine, general & internal
Effect of food on nifedipine pharmacokinetics

D. Reitberg,S. Love,Guy T Quercia,M. Zinny

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/clpt.1987.110

1987-07-01

Clinical pharmacology and therapy

Abstract:
Health promotion and participatory action research with South Asian women

U K Choudhry,S Jandu,J Mahal,R Singh,H Sohi-Pabla,B Mutta

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2002.00075.x

Abstract:Purpose: To examine South Asian immigrant women's health promotion issues and to facilitate the creation of emancipatory knowledge and self-understanding regarding health-promoting practices; to promote health education and mobilization for culturally relevant action. Method: The study was based on critical social theory; the research model was participatory action research (PAR). Two groups of South Asian women (women from India and of Indian origin) who had immigrated to Canada participated in the project. The qualitative data were generated through focus groups. Reflexive and dialectical critique were used as methods of analyzing qualitative data. The data were interpreted through reiterative process, and dominant themes were identified. Findings: Three themes that were extracted from the data were: (a) the importance of maintaining culture and tradition, (b) placing family needs before self, and (c) surviving by being strong. An issue for action was the risk of intergenerational conflicts leading to alienation of family members. Over a period of 3 years, the following action plans were carried out: (a) workshops for parents and children, (b) sharing of project findings with the community, and (c) a presentation at an annual public health conference. Conclusions and implications: The project activities empowered participants to create and share knowledge, which was then applied toward action for change. Health and health promotion were viewed as functions of the women's relationships to the world around them.
Landscape of Metis health and wellness: protocol for a scoping review

Helana Marie Boutros,Sabastian Koprich,Abigail J Simms,Noel Tsui,Rose-Anne Boyle,Jen Harrison,Melissa Riddell,Santana Sanftenberg,Shelley Cripps,Sarah A Edwards,Boutros,H. M.,Koprich,S.,Simms,A. J.,Tsui,N.,Boyle,R.-A.,Harrison,J.,Riddell,M.,Sanftenberg,S.,Cripps,S.,Edwards,S. A.,Metis Nation of Ontario (MNO)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077868

IF: 3.006

2024-03-10

BMJ Open

Abstract:Introduction In Canada, Métis people are one of three distinct Indigenous peoples whose rights are recognised and affirmed in Section 35 of the federal Constitution Act, 1982 . In line with Métis people having a unique culture, history, language and way of life, a distinctions-based approach is critical to understand the current landscape of Métis-specific health. In this paper, we present a scoping review protocol to describe this research landscape in Canada led by the Métis Nation of Ontario (MNO). Methods and analysis This scoping review protocol is reported in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews reporting guidelines and follows Arksey and O'Malley's scoping review methodology. We will search electronic databases (Scopus, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, APA PsycINFO, Anthropology Plus, Bibliography of Indigenous Peoples of North America, Canadian Business and Current Affairs, Indigenous Studies Portal, Informit Indigenous Collection, Collaborative Indigenous Garden, PubMed, ProQuest), grey literature sources and reference lists from selected papers. Two reviewers (HMB and SK) will double-blind screen all titles/abstracts and full-text studies for inclusion. Any health-related study or health report that includes a Métis-specific health, well-being or Métis social determinant of health outcome will be included. Relevant variables will be extracted following an iterative process whereby the data charting will be reviewed and updated. Ethics and dissemination Findings from this scoping review will be shared back through the MNO's existing community-based communication channels. Traditional academic dissemination will also be pursued. Research ethics board approval is not required, since data are from peer-reviewed publications or publicly shared health reports and knowledge translation products.

medicine, general & internal
“Finding a Space for Me Outside the Stereotypes”: Community Engagement in Policy and Research to Foster Canadian Racialised Immigrant Women’s Mental Health and Well-Being

Judith A. MacDonnell,Mahdieh Dastjerdi,Nimo Bokore,Wangari Tharao,Nazilla Khanlou,Wairimu Njoroge

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-017-9776-5

IF: 8

2017-06-08

International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction

Abstract:Racialised immigrant women face many challenges with resettlement with potential impacts on their mental health and well-being. Recent community-based research (CBR) and associated knowledge translation/exchange (KTE) activities with racialised immigrant women in Toronto, Canada, suggest that activism can promote their mental health and well-being. In this paper, the researchers describe community engagement processes in the CBR that included a stakeholder Think Tank with communities, researchers and service providers in settlement and mental health sectors to create an action plan based on the research. Using a feminist post-colonial lens to analyse the Think Tank data yielded research, policy and program strategies aligned with principles such as building on individuals’ and communities’ strengths and foregrounding gender and racialisation in strategies that can enhance racialised immigrant women’s capacities to take action and overcome barriers. Research, policy and program implications for comprehensive strategies that support health equity, thereby promoting their mental health and well-being, are considered.

psychiatry,substance abuse,psychology, clinical

Invited Talk Human-Agent Teamwork in Cyber Defense

Knowledge mobilization with and for equity-deserving communities invested in research: A scoping review protocol

Patient, caregiver and other knowledge user engagement in consensus-building healthcare initiatives: a scoping review protocol

Effect of a bacterial lipopolysaccharide treatment on rabbit testis and ejaculated sperm.

A chair at the table: a scoping review of the participation of refugees in community-based participatory research in healthcare

Reinforcing the conventional sternal closure.

Knowledge translation strategies for dissemination with a focus on healthcare recipients: an overview of systematic reviews

What do you mean by engagement? – evaluating the use of community engagement in the design and implementation of chronic disease-based interventions for Indigenous populations – scoping review

Protocol for a scoping review of traditional medicine research methods, methodologies, frameworks and strategies

Barriers and facilitators of lifestyle management among adult South Asian migrants living with chronic diseases: A mixed-methods systematic review

Mechanisms and attitudes in responsive health care for forced migrant communities. A qualitative study of transnational practice.

Experimental studies testing interventions to promote cultural safety, interculturality or antiracism in healthcare: protocol for a systematic review

Facilitators of and barriers to patient and public involvement in building learning health systems in community health services settings: a scoping review protocol

Barriers and facilitators to refugees and asylum seekers accessing non hospital based care: A mixed methods systematic review protocol.

Patient, family and caregiver engagement in diabetes care: a scoping review protocol

Digital Methods in the Promotion of Well-Being in Immigrants: A Systematic Review

Exploring how to widen the acceptability of public health interventions: a systematic review protocol

Effect of food on nifedipine pharmacokinetics

Health promotion and participatory action research with South Asian women

Landscape of Metis health and wellness: protocol for a scoping review

“Finding a Space for Me Outside the Stereotypes”: Community Engagement in Policy and Research to Foster Canadian Racialised Immigrant Women’s Mental Health and Well-Being