Knowledge mobilization with and for equity-deserving communities invested in research: A scoping review protocol

Ramy Barhouche,Samson Tse,Fiona Inglis,Debbie Chaves,Erin Allison,Tina Colaco,Melody Morton Ninomiya

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.06.24313221

2024-09-07

Abstract:The practice of putting research into action is known by various names, depending on disciplinary norms. Knowledge mobilization, translation, and transfer (collectively referred to as K*) are three common terminologies used in research literature. Knowledge-to-action opportunities and gaps in academic research often remain obscure to non-academic researchers in communities, policy and decision makers, and practitioners who could benefit from up-to-date information on health and wellbeing. Academic research training, funding, and performance metrics rarely prioritize or address non-academic community needs from research. We propose to conduct a scoping review on reported K* in community-driven research contexts, examining the governance, processes, methods, and benefits of K*, and mapping who, what, where, and when K* terminology is used. This protocol paper outlines our approach to gathering, screening, analyzing, and reporting on available published literature from four databases.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The main problems that this paper attempts to solve are the inconsistency and ambiguity in the use of terms, definitions, and application processes of Knowledge Mobilization (K*) in the context of community - driven research. Specifically, the paper focuses on the following aspects:

1. **Use of terms and concepts**: Explore how K* - related terms (such as knowledge translation, knowledge mobilization, knowledge transfer, etc.) are used, defined, and cited in published literature. Since different disciplines use these terms differently, it has led to conceptual confusion and misunderstanding.

2. **Participation of community partners**: Analyze how non - academic community research partners participate in the priority - setting, planning, and implementation processes of K*. This includes understanding the roles and contributions of community members in research, as well as their actual participation levels in K* activities.

3. **Well - being - related impacts and outcomes**: Evaluate the health - and - well - being - related impacts and outcomes addressed at the community level through K* efforts. In particular, focus on whether these efforts have effectively improved the health status of individuals, families, or communities.

4. **Fairness and representativeness of research**: Ensure that the research focuses on those communities that are unfairly treated in terms of health and well - being, namely the so - called "equity - deserving communities". The paper emphasizes the importance and necessity of these communities in research, especially their role in promoting social fairness and justice.

Through the exploration of these issues, the paper aims to provide a comprehensive review, revealing the current situation, challenges, and opportunities of K* in community - driven research, and providing guidance for future research and practice.