Abstract:According to a recent social science debate, citizens tend to perceive income inequality rather inaccurately, which also influences their acceptance of redistributive policy programmes. The study reported in this article examines whether this can be confirmed using the example of the wealth tax. The wealth tax was suspended in Germany in 1996, but politicians have been debating its reintroduction for several years. Against the background of the debate on biased perceptions in the formation of distributional policy preferences, the article asks, first, how accurately the existing tax burden on wealthy households through the top income tax rate is assessed and whether a bias has consequences for the support of a wealth tax. Second, based on approaches that attribute an important role to mass media in the formation of distributional policy preferences, the influence of media framing on the acceptance of this controversial instrument is examined. According to data from an online survey, the burden of the top income tax tends to be overestimated. The more the tax is overestimated, the lower the political support for a wealth tax. Framing experiments with randomized control and treatment groups have mapped current discourses around the wealth tax and reconstructed positive frames-wealth taxes as an investment promoting tax reform, as a contribution to the reduction of national debt caused by the coronavirus pandemic-as well as negative frames-restriction of investments and loss of jobs if companies are burdened. Exposing potential job losses significantly lowers the support for a wealth tax. Strong support drops to the middle category of "partly/partly," a signal of indecision. The struggle for naming power is thus open. Support for a property tax becomes uncertain the more that political communication activates the framework of threatened jobs.

Effects of signalling tax evasion on redistribution and voting preferences: Evidence from the Panama Papers

Behavioral Responses to Wealth Taxation: Evidence from Colombia

Can Preferences for Redistribution Explain the Impact of Austerity on Political Participation? Evidence from the UK

Inequality shapes the propagation of unethical behaviours: Cheating responses to tax evasion along the income distribution

Tax the élites! The role of economic inequality and conspiracy beliefs on attitudes towards taxes and redistribution intentions

Assessing income redistribution: what are the key analytic choices?

Tax evasion and tax avoidance

Taxpayer response to greater progressivity: evidence from personal income tax reform in Uganda

A randomized intervention to gauge preferred tax rates and progressivity

The political economy of big data leaks: Uncovering the skeleton of tax evasion

[Perceived Inequality and Political Demand]

Taxing Windfall Money: A Quasi-experimental Study

Does Private Country-by-Country Reporting Deter Tax Avoidance and Income Shifting? Evidence from BEPS Action Item 13

The political economy of inequality, mobility and redistribution

Corruption spills over on citizens: The case of self‐reported motivation to cheat on tax

Inequality aversion predicts support for public and private redistribution

Does redistribution affect cooperation and trust?

Discovering tax decentralization: does it impact marginal willingness to pay taxes?

Is Charitable Giving Political? New Evidence from Wealth and Income Tax Returns

Analysing the effects of tax-benefit reforms on income distribution: a decomposition approach

Globalization and the societal consensus of wealth tax cuts