Abstract:Theoretical models prescribe how institutions can promote cooperation in a population by imposing appropriate punishments or rewards on individuals. However, many real-world institutions are not sophisticated or responsive enough to ensure cooperation by calibrating their policies. Or, worse yet, an institution might selfishly exploit the population it governs for its own benefit. Here, we study the evolution of cooperation in the presence of an institution that is autonomous, in the sense that it has its own interests that may or may not align with those of the population. The institution imposes a tax on the population and redistributes a portion of the tax revenue to cooperators, withholding the remaining revenue for itself. The institution adjusts its rates of taxation and redistribution to optimize its own long-term, discounted utility. We consider three types of institutions with different goals, embodied in their utility functions. We show that a prosocial institution, whose goal is to maximize the average payoff of the population, can indeed promote cooperation—but only if it is sufficiently forward-looking. On the other hand, an institution that seeks to maximize welfare among cooperators alone will successfully promote collective cooperation even if it is myopic. Remarkably, even a selfish institution, which seeks to maximize the revenue it withholds for itself, can nonetheless promote cooperation. The average payoff of the population increases when a selfish institution is more forward-looking, so that a population under a selfish regime can sometimes fare better than under anarchy. Our analysis highlights the potential benefits of institutional wealth redistribution, even when an institution does not share the interests of the population it governs.

Does redistribution affect cooperation and trust?

Does reducing inequality increase cooperation?

Redistribution based on willingness to cooperate promotes cooperation while intensifying equality in heterogeneous populations

Inequality of Opportunity and Income Redistribution

A note on redistributive fairness and economic reform

Inequality reduction and cooperation: Injection of additional resources

THE EFFECTS OF RACE, INCOME, MOBILITY AND POLITICAL BELIEFS ON SUPPORT FOR REDISTRIBUTION

Absolute versus Relative Poverty and Wealth: Cooperation in the Presence of Between-Group Inequality

Effects of income redistribution on the evolution of cooperation in spatial public goods games

Can institutions foster cooperation by wealth redistribution?

Assessing income redistribution: what are the key analytic choices?

Attitudes towards redistribution and the interplay between perceptions and beliefs about inequality.

Social Division, Trust, and Reciprocity among Chinese Inmates

Is Redistribution Good for Our Health? Examining the Macro-Correlation between Welfare Generosity and Health across EU Nations over the Last 40 Years

Increasing benefits in one-time public goods does not promote cooperation

Fairness views and cooperation under varying levels of economic inequality

When and why does economic inequality predict prosocial behaviour? Examining the role of interpersonal trust among different targets

Parochial trust and cooperation across 17 societies

Equality, equity and incentives: An experiment

Redistribution spurs growth by using a portfolio effect on human capital

Experimental Studies on Preference for Redistribution：A survey